Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Did America learn anything from Hitler? (Read 4389 times)
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #15 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:28pm
 
Here is the Barbarossa Decree according to Wikipedia.

Quote:
The background behind the Barbarossa Decree was laid out by Hitler during a high level meeting with military officials on March 30, 1941,[38] where he declared that war against Soviet Russia would be a war of extermination, in which both the political and intellectual elites of Russia would be eradicated by German forces, in order to ensure a long-lasting German victory.[38] Hitler underlined that executions would not be a matter for military courts, but for the organised action of the military.[38] The decree, issued by Field Marshal Keitel a few weeks before Operation Barbarossa, exempted punishable offenses committed by enemy civilians (in Russia) from the jurisdiction of military justice. Suspects were to be brought before an officer who would decide if they were to be shot. Prosecution of offenses against civilians by members of the Wehrmacht was decreed to be "not required" unless necessary for the maintenance of discipline.

The order specified:
"The partisans are to be ruthlessly eliminated in battle or during attempts to escape," and all attacks by the civilian population against Wehrmacht soldiers are to be "suppressed by the army on the spot by using extreme measures, till [the] annihilation of the attackers;
Every officer in the German occupation in the East of the future will be entitled to perform execution(s) without trial, without any formalities, on any person suspected of having a hostile attitude towards the Germans", (the same applied to prisoners of war);
"If you have not managed to identify and punish the perpetrators of anti-German acts, you are allowed to apply the principle of collective responsibility. 'Collective measures' against residents of the area where the attack occurred can then be applied after approval by the battalion commander or higher level of command";
German soldiers who commit crimes against humanity, the USSR and prisoners of war are to be exempted from criminal responsibility, even if they commit acts punishable according to German law.[38][39]


Although I can see the moral hazard that comes with exempting US military personnel from Afghan Law, it does not embody the absolute immorality of the Barbarossa Decree.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:42pm by MOTR »  

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Chard
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mein Führer! I can walk!

Posts: 1077
Alabama, USA
Gender: male
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #16 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:32pm
 
MOTR wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:06pm:
Chard wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 5:18pm:
Peter Freedman wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 4:49pm:
Godwin's Law said the longer an Internet discussion continues, the more likely it is that Hitler or the Nazis will be mentioned.

When the theme of the discussion is Hitler or the Nazis, the the law surely doesn't apply. Suggesting it does is a way to avoid discussing the topic.


The Godwin is also a benchmard for how absurd a discussion can potentially become, Peter. If we look at the topic of the thread honestly it's plainly evident that any argument pointing out smilarities between Hitler and Obama or the US to Nazi can be applied to just about any nation and its leadership. If Ringer was honest he'd just acknowledge that this thread is not about discussing anything other than how bad his perception of the US is. This thread is every bit as retarded as a Fox News opinion piece comparing Democrat politicians to Nazis.


I disagree, Chard. The point being made is that Obama's  exemption of the US military from prosecution should they commit crimes against civilians is equivalent to the Barbarossa jurisdiction Decree', which exempted German soldiers from prosecution if they committed a crime against any Soviet civilian.


There's a huge difference between trying your soldier under your own military justice code and simply refusing to even recognize their actions as being criminal.

Quote:
So far raising Godwin's Law has prevented an honest discussion of this claim. Perhaps it is an unfair comparison, I don't have enough information to form an opinion. Perhap's ridicule was the appropriate response, we shall see.


That because it's a dishonest claim to begin with.
Back to top
 

Deterrence is the art of producing in the mind of the enemy... the FEAR to attack.
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #17 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:43pm
 
I agree that it is an unfair comparison. However, it's not dishonest if it is genuinely believed.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Ringer
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 313
Mainland NZ
Gender: male
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #18 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:44pm
 
Chard wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:32pm:
There's a huge difference between trying your soldier under your own military justice code and simply refusing to even recognize their actions as being criminal..



So there is something to be discussed but you choose instead to dismiss the subject.  You must be afraid of something. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ringer
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 313
Mainland NZ
Gender: male
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #19 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:45pm
 
MOTR wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:28pm:
Although I can see the moral hazard that comes with exempting US military personnel from Afghan Law, it does not embody the absolute immorality of the Barbarossa Decree.



Google the fate of Taxi driver  Dilawar to see how this pans out in practice.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #20 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:50pm
 
Ringer wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:45pm:
MOTR wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:28pm:
Although I can see the moral hazard that comes with exempting US military personnel from Afghan Law, it does not embody the absolute immorality of the Barbarossa Decree.



Google the fate of Taxi driver  Dilawar to see how this pans out in practice.


I've no doubt in practice human rights are violated. I'm still yet to decide if the exemption is something I could justify. However, from the perspective of my limited understanding, it seems far from the barbarity of the Barbarossa Declaration.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
red baron
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10204
Blue Mountains
Gender: male
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #21 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:54pm
 
Peter, we have consensus on your reply to my post. We should crack a bottle of champers on that one.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #22 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:55pm
 
Quote:
Dilawar (born c. 1979 – December 10, 2002), also known as Dilawar of Yakubi, was an Afghan taxi driver who was tortured to death by US army soldiers at the Bagram Collection Point, a US military detention center in Afghanistan.
He arrived at the prison on December 5, 2002, and was declared dead 5 days later. His death was declared a homicide and investigated and prosecuted in the Bagram torture and prisoner abuse trials. The award winning documentary Taxi to the Dark Side focuses on the murder of Dilawar.[1]


Quote:
On the day of his death, Dilawar had been chained by the wrists to the top of his cell for much of the previous four days. A guard tried to force the young man to his knees. But his legs, which had been pummeled by guards for several days, could no longer bend. An interrogator told Mr. Dilawar that he could see a doctor after they finished with him. When he was finally sent back to his cell, though, the guards were instructed only to chain the prisoner back to the ceiling. "Leave him up," one of the guards quoted Specialist Claus as saying. Several hours passed before an emergency room doctor finally saw Mr. Dilawar. By then he was dead, his body beginning to stiffen. It would be many months before Army investigators learned that most of the interrogators had in fact believed Mr. Dilawar to be an innocent man who simply drove his taxi past the American base at the wrong time.[2]

Death

The findings of Mr. Dilawar's autopsy were succinct.[4] Leaked internal United States Army documentation, a death certificate dated 12 December 2002, ruled that his death was due to a direct result of assaults and attacks he sustained at the hands of interrogators of the 519th Military Intelligence Battalion during his stay at Bagram. The document was signed by Lt. Col. Elizabeth A. Rouse of the U.S. Air Force, a pathologist with the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in Washington DC, and listed as its finding that the "mode of death" was "homicide," and not "natural," "accident" and "suicide"[5] and that the cause of death was "blunt-force injuries to lower extremities complicating coronary artery disease".[6]

A subsequent autopsy revealed that his legs had been "pulpified," and that even if Dilawar had survived, it would have been necessary to amputate his legs.[7]

According to the death certificate shown in the documentary Taxi to the Dark Side, the box marked Homicide had been checked as the ultimate cause of death. however, the military had so far publicly claimed that Dilawar had died from natural causes. It was only by accident that the death certificate was leaked, when New York Times reporter named Carlotta Gall managed to track down Dilawar's family in Yakubi, where Dilawar's brother, Shahpoor, showed her a folded paper, he had received with Dilawar's body. He could not read because it was in English. It was the death certificate.[8]
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 7th, 2013 at 7:01pm by MOTR »  

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Chard
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mein Führer! I can walk!

Posts: 1077
Alabama, USA
Gender: male
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #23 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:56pm
 
MOTR wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:43pm:
I agree that it is an unfair comparison. However, it's not dishonest if it is genuinely believed.


A lie is still a lie no matter how many people choose to believe it. If enough people believe 2+2=3 it doesn't mean math is wrong, it just means they're terrible at math.
Back to top
 

Deterrence is the art of producing in the mind of the enemy... the FEAR to attack.
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #24 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 7:05pm
 
Chard wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:56pm:
MOTR wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:43pm:
I agree that it is an unfair comparison. However, it's not dishonest if it is genuinely believed.


A lie is still a lie no matter how many people choose to believe it. If enough people believe 2+2=3 it doesn't mean math is wrong, it just means they're terrible at math.


I guess it depends on your definition of a lie. I've no problem with people stating what they believe, particularly if it's a position they hold to be true. It becomes a lie when they wilfully remain ignorant or choose to deny certain facts.


Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Peter Freedman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5275
Wellington
Gender: male
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #25 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 7:06pm
 
red baron wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:54pm:
Peter, we have consensus on your reply to my post. We should crack a bottle of champers on that one.


Okay, your place or mine?
Back to top
 

God grant me the patience to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can and, above all, the wisdom to tell the difference.
 
IP Logged
 
Chard
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mein Führer! I can walk!

Posts: 1077
Alabama, USA
Gender: male
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #26 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 7:11pm
 
MOTR wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 7:05pm:
Chard wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:56pm:
MOTR wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:43pm:
I agree that it is an unfair comparison. However, it's not dishonest if it is genuinely believed.


A lie is still a lie no matter how many people choose to believe it. If enough people believe 2+2=3 it doesn't mean math is wrong, it just means they're terrible at math.


I guess it depends on your definition of a lie. I've no problem with people stating what they believe, particularly if it's a position they hold to be true. It becomes a lie when they wilfully remain ignorant or choose to deny certain facts.




Please feel free to quote where I said that anyone couldn't give their opinion. While you're doing that I'll continue calling bullshit on opinions that are factually wrong.
Back to top
 

Deterrence is the art of producing in the mind of the enemy... the FEAR to attack.
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #27 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 7:13pm
 
Chard wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 7:11pm:
MOTR wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 7:05pm:
Chard wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:56pm:
MOTR wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:43pm:
I agree that it is an unfair comparison. However, it's not dishonest if it is genuinely believed.


A lie is still a lie no matter how many people choose to believe it. If enough people believe 2+2=3 it doesn't mean math is wrong, it just means they're terrible at math.


I guess it depends on your definition of a lie. I've no problem with people stating what they believe, particularly if it's a position they hold to be true. It becomes a lie when they wilfully remain ignorant or choose to deny certain facts.




Please feel free to quote where I said that anyone couldn't give their opinion. While you're doing that I'll continue calling bullshit on opinions that are factually wrong.


I can't see any problem with that. Just keep in mind that sometimes others don't know why it is bullshit.

Now, removing the Nazi analogy, is it justified to exempt military personnel from civilian law?
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #28 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 7:26pm
 
Ringer wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 11:21am:
Looking through notes regarding Hitlers plan to invade Russia I was reminded of the 'Barbarossa jurisdiction Decree', which exempted German soldiers from prosecution if they committed a crime against any Soviet civilian.


America has exempted itself and her military from prosecution should they commit crimes against civilians in countries such as Iraq (or anywhere else in the world for that matter).

As if Hitler invented the idea of indemnifying one's own armies' troops. Roll Eyes

Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Chard
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mein Führer! I can walk!

Posts: 1077
Alabama, USA
Gender: male
Re: Did America learn anything from Hitler?
Reply #29 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 7:29pm
 
MOTR wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 7:13pm:
Chard wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 7:11pm:
MOTR wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 7:05pm:
Chard wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:56pm:
MOTR wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:43pm:
I agree that it is an unfair comparison. However, it's not dishonest if it is genuinely believed.


A lie is still a lie no matter how many people choose to believe it. If enough people believe 2+2=3 it doesn't mean math is wrong, it just means they're terrible at math.


I guess it depends on your definition of a lie. I've no problem with people stating what they believe, particularly if it's a position they hold to be true. It becomes a lie when they wilfully remain ignorant or choose to deny certain facts.




Please feel free to quote where I said that anyone couldn't give their opinion. While you're doing that I'll continue calling bullshit on opinions that are factually wrong.


I can't see any problem with that. Just keep in mind that sometimes others don't know why it is bullshit.

Now, removing the Nazi analogy, is it justified to exempt military personnel from civilian law?


Yes and no.

No, it's not wrong to investigate, try and convict military personnel for criminal actions.

Yes, it is wrong to use civilian legal standards simply because most civilan law is inadaquate for handling general court marshall proceadings.
Back to top
 

Deterrence is the art of producing in the mind of the enemy... the FEAR to attack.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print