Andrei.Hicks wrote on Apr 10
th, 2013 at 11:30am:
"I think the question, if you don't mind me saying, is flawed in itself.
Now would I do the same thing again? Make the same decisions? If its based on the same evidence I had at the time then yes absolutely.
Look we invaded Iraq and removed Saddam Hussein because it was the right thing to do. I didn't do it for popularity, when you have significant members of your own party against you and you're relying on the Conservative opposition to support you against your own members, then obviously its not a popularity thing.
Would I make the same decision again? Yes.
Do I have any regrets? Well obviously any death, particularly those of British servicemen who have gone in under my instruction weighs heavily with me, but regrets? No I don't.
We made the choice to remove this tyrant and I regret nothing on that.
It was, quite simply the right thing to do."
Tony Blair
Parliamentary Inquiry, 2012.
If its based on the same evidence I had at the time then yes absolutely.There was a substantial amount of genuine evidence where the leaders had made sure that they were not exposed too.
The Iraq WMD scientist who had moved to Canada who wanted to address both Australia’s Parliament and the USA equivalent telling anyone who would listen that the WMD stockpile had been destroyed in the first war along with most of the scientists and technology chemicals and records along with the building containing them. Also that he had reviewed the work of the remaining scientists capable and found they were mostly doing credible work in agriculture.
This guy was refused - the relivant authorities didn't want to know the truth.
The decisions were made based on the evidence they wanted much of it manufactured or presented dishonestly.