Australian Politics Forum - Although ugly and not condoned, I do see the irony

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Although ugly and not condoned, I do see the irony
Reply #15 - Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:36pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:30pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:19pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:58pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:52pm:

The usual "gays are the problem" argument.

It is a bit hard to get the answers to my questions without joining the dots.

Yep just like the blacks were the problem.
And those asians.
and those asylum seekers.
and those muslims.

Why can't they all just f*off, right?

And don't forget:

"They were wearing short skirts, so it's no wonder they were raped".

Roll Eyes

Well that is out of the scope of my original questions. I dont know how prevelant that is and rape is something that all societies struggle with really.

I am interested in the gay demographic because gay bashing has been almost eradicated in Australia and UK(but more population would not seem so to an Australian) and am wondering how they feel about it being in danger of returning more so in a religion that has shown its stubborn dogma, so will revive for a very long time I would suggest.

The prejudices of a few should not stop people from striving to get what is rightfully theirs. It's as simple as that. One cannot blame the "religion" as you like to call it (and on some level I understand why you do) for the prejudice of others. And you should not be suggesting to gay people to stop their plight because some in the community may reignite their hatred by using violence. These are the people with the problem and they are the ones that we must condemn.

I talk of the religion because there is a direct connection to the prejudice and because of its stubborn dogma.

I am in no way suggesting gays do anything apart from hopefully answer my questions. I am actually interested in the conundrum.

The part of linking the greens is the only prejudice I speak because I dont like the greens because of their policies, roots and the greens have greater gay numbers than any other party, so relates to them more.

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17029	Re: Although ugly and not condoned, I do see the irony Reply #16 - Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:39pm Gee there is a lot of 4th graders in here tonight.
Back to top	IP Logged

The_Barnacle

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Although ugly and not condoned, I do see the irony
Reply #17 - Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:48pm

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 8:57pm:

Are gays happy to fight for a religion that may also mean gay bashing goes on the rise?

Since when have gays "fought" for any religion?
Progs, this thread is ridiculous even by your standards.

I really don't see any irony at all.

The only way it could be ironic is if you make a few ridiculous assumptions.
Left wing defend the rights of Gays - therefore all gays must be left wing
Left wing defend the rights of foreigners - therefore gays must also.
All muslims bash gays - therefore attacks on "gays" are ironic

The stupidity of these assumptions is quite breathtaking even for you progs.

Back to top

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Although ugly and not condoned, I do see the irony
Reply #18 - Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:53pm

The_Barnacle wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:48pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 8:57pm:

Are gays happy to fight for a religion that may also mean gay bashing goes on the rise?

Since when have gays "fought" for any religion?
Progs, this thread is ridiculous even by your standards.

I really don't see any irony at all.

The only way it could be ironic is if you make a few ridiculous assumptions.
Left wing defend the rights of Gays - therefore all gays must be left wing
Left wing defend the rights of foreigners - therefore gays must also.
All muslims bash gays - therefore attacks on "gays" are ironic

The stupidity of these assumptions is quite breathtaking even for you progs.

I am not here to teach you my logic, you have your own obviously.

That is your opinion but sadly it reflects more of being blind than anything else.

My thread may not be palatable, but it is relevant.

Back to top

IP Logged

Amadd Gold Member Offline Mo Posts: 6217	Re: Although band not condoned, I do see the irony Reply #19 - Apr 11^th, 2013 at 11:21pm When religion eventually totally loses it's power to send people to hell, it will fall by the wayside or transform itself into more palatable ideals.
Back to top	IP Logged

Chard

Gold Member

Offline

Mein Führer! I can walk!

Posts: 1077
Alabama, USA
Gender: male

Re: Although band not condoned, I do see the irony
Reply #20 - Apr 12^th, 2013 at 4:40am

Amadd wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 11:21pm:

When religion eventually totally loses it's power to send people to hell, it will fall by the wayside or transform itself into more palatable ideals.

What power is this? That assumes that A. religion is not just a collection of formalized superstitions and there really are invisable sky pixies, and B. that hell is a real, physical location (no, Detroit, Michigan does not count). Sine there isn't any evidence to support either assumption then it stands to reason religion doesn't actually have "power" beyond what the ignorant grant them.

Back to the topic, Abrahamic religions are predisposed to homophobia, who knew. It's not just Muslims, Christians and Jews both do the exact same sh*t. The pronlem isn't the gays, itvs ignorant bastards holding that the ancient social morals of cattle sacrificing primatives is better than not being a dick to their fellow man.

Back to top

Deterrence is the art of producing in the mind of the enemy... the FEAR to attack.

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: Although ugly and not condoned, I do see the irony
Reply #21 - Apr 12^th, 2013 at 5:07am

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:14pm:

skippy. wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:12pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:09pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:58pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:52pm:

The usual "gays are the problem" argument.

It is a bit hard to get the answers to my questions without joining the dots.

Yep just like the blacks were the problem.
And those asians.
and those asylum seekers.
and those muslims.

Why can't they all just f*off, right?

How long do you think it would take to get it out of that religion to make it stop?

I'd like to see conservative buggers bashed, just as a study of course, to see how long before the stupidly could be bashed out of them.

It would seem you have already been testing the outcome or more to the point, someone has been testing it on you.

Are you saying conservatives are all gay?

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: Although ugly and not condoned, I do see the irony
Reply #22 - Apr 12^th, 2013 at 5:09am

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:19pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:58pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:52pm:

The usual "gays are the problem" argument.

It is a bit hard to get the answers to my questions without joining the dots.

Yep just like the blacks were the problem.
And those asians.
and those asylum seekers.
and those muslims.

Why can't they all just f*off, right?

And don't forget:

"They were wearing short skirts, so it's no wonder they were raped".

Roll Eyes

Well that is out of the scope of my original questions. I dont know how prevelant that is and rape is something that all societies struggle with really.

I am interested in the gay demographic because gay bashing has been almost eradicated in Australia and UK(but more population would not seem so to an Australian) and am wondering how they feel about it being in danger of returning more so in a religion that has shown its stubborn dogma, so will revive for a very long time I would suggest.

All societies dont struggle with gay? I guess not since some have accepted it now.

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

KJT1981

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1822

Re: Although band not condoned, I do see the irony
Reply #23 - Apr 12^th, 2013 at 7:01am

Chard wrote on Apr 12^th, 2013 at 4:40am:

Amadd wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 11:21pm:

When religion eventually totally loses it's power to send people to hell, it will fall by the wayside or transform itself into more palatable ideals.

What power is this? That assumes that A. religion is not just a collection of formalized superstitions and there really are invisable sky pixies, and B. that hell is a real, physical location (no, Detroit, Michigan does not count). Sine there isn't any evidence to support either assumption then it stands to reason religion doesn't actually have "power" beyond what the ignorant grant them.

Back to the topic, Abrahamic religions are predisposed to homophobia, who knew. It's not just Muslims, Christians and Jews both do the exact same sh*t. The pronlem isn't the gays, itvs ignorant bastards holding that the ancient social morals of cattle sacrificing primatives is better than not being a dick to their fellow man.

How about Hancock, Michigan Chard?

Back to top

IP Logged

KJT1981

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1822

Re: Although ugly and not condoned, I do see the irony
Reply #24 - Apr 12^th, 2013 at 7:02am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 12^th, 2013 at 5:09am:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:19pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:58pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:52pm:

The usual "gays are the problem" argument.

It is a bit hard to get the answers to my questions without joining the dots.

Yep just like the blacks were the problem.
And those asians.
and those asylum seekers.
and those muslims.

Why can't they all just f*off, right?

And don't forget:

"They were wearing short skirts, so it's no wonder they were raped".

Roll Eyes

Well that is out of the scope of my original questions. I dont know how prevelant that is and rape is something that all societies struggle with really.

I am interested in the gay demographic because gay bashing has been almost eradicated in Australia and UK(but more population would not seem so to an Australian) and am wondering how they feel about it being in danger of returning more so in a religion that has shown its stubborn dogma, so will revive for a very long time I would suggest.

All societies dont struggle with gay? I guess not since some have accepted it now.

SOB

Does that mean you will 'come out' now Miss Borg?

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Although ugly and not condoned, I do see the irony
Reply #25 - Apr 12^th, 2013 at 8:03am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 12^th, 2013 at 5:09am:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:19pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:58pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:52pm:

The usual "gays are the problem" argument.

It is a bit hard to get the answers to my questions without joining the dots.

Yep just like the blacks were the problem.
And those asians.
and those asylum seekers.
and those muslims.

Why can't they all just f*off, right?

And don't forget:

"They were wearing short skirts, so it's no wonder they were raped".

Roll Eyes

Well that is out of the scope of my original questions. I dont know how prevelant that is and rape is something that all societies struggle with really.

I am interested in the gay demographic because gay bashing has been almost eradicated in Australia and UK(but more population would not seem so to an Australian) and am wondering how they feel about it being in danger of returning more so in a religion that has shown its stubborn dogma, so will revive for a very long time I would suggest.

All societies dont struggle with gay? I guess not since some have accepted it now.

SOB

I cant see any part about this thread that says societies dont struggle with gay. Well done for totally missing the point of not all societies struggle with gay bashing. They may have in the past and to the point, may again.

Im pretty sure I made the point quite obvious, but you, you are challenged.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 88048	Re: Although ugly and not condoned, I do see the irony Reply #26 - Apr 12^th, 2013 at 8:26am go to any pub in Sydney on a Saturday night and see them punch each other out.. its not a gay thing its a male thing..men are like apes they have arms so swing them... what else are they for. oh I forgot now they also put the boot in.makes them braver I think.
Back to top	IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Although ugly and not condoned, I do see the irony
Reply #27 - Apr 12^th, 2013 at 8:33am

cods wrote on Apr 12^th, 2013 at 8:26am:

go to any pub in Sydney on a Saturday night and see them punch each other out.. its not a gay thing its a male thing..men are like apes they have arms so swing them... what else are they for.

oh I forgot now they also put the boot in.makes them braver I think.

Although true cods, it really is another thread on its own. Gay bashing and your every day male on male violence are very seperate issues.

Back to top

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: Although ugly and not condoned, I do see the irony
Reply #28 - Apr 12^th, 2013 at 8:43am

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 12^th, 2013 at 8:03am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 12^th, 2013 at 5:09am:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:19pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:58pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:52pm:

The usual "gays are the problem" argument.

It is a bit hard to get the answers to my questions without joining the dots.

Yep just like the blacks were the problem.
And those asians.
and those asylum seekers.
and those muslims.

Why can't they all just f*off, right?

And don't forget:

"They were wearing short skirts, so it's no wonder they were raped".

Roll Eyes

Well that is out of the scope of my original questions. I dont know how prevelant that is and rape is something that all societies struggle with really.

I am interested in the gay demographic because gay bashing has been almost eradicated in Australia and UK(but more population would not seem so to an Australian) and am wondering how they feel about it being in danger of returning more so in a religion that has shown its stubborn dogma, so will revive for a very long time I would suggest.

All societies dont struggle with gay? I guess not since some have accepted it now.

SOB

I cant see any part about this thread that says societies dont struggle with gay. Well done for totally missing the point of not all societies struggle with gay bashing. They may have in the past and to the point, may again.

Im pretty sure I made the point quite obvious, but you, you are challenged.

Gawd. No comprehension skills as usual. You said that rape was different because all societies struggle with it. So no societies struggle with gay or gay bashing?

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: Although ugly and not condoned, I do see the irony
Reply #29 - Apr 12^th, 2013 at 8:43am

KJT1981 wrote on Apr 12^th, 2013 at 7:02am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 12^th, 2013 at 5:09am:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:19pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 10:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:58pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 11^th, 2013 at 9:52pm:

The usual "gays are the problem" argument.

It is a bit hard to get the answers to my questions without joining the dots.

Yep just like the blacks were the problem.
And those asians.
and those asylum seekers.
and those muslims.

Why can't they all just f*off, right?

And don't forget:

"They were wearing short skirts, so it's no wonder they were raped".

Roll Eyes

Well that is out of the scope of my original questions. I dont know how prevelant that is and rape is something that all societies struggle with really.

I am interested in the gay demographic because gay bashing has been almost eradicated in Australia and UK(but more population would not seem so to an Australian) and am wondering how they feel about it being in danger of returning more so in a religion that has shown its stubborn dogma, so will revive for a very long time I would suggest.

All societies dont struggle with gay? I guess not since some have accepted it now.

SOB

Does that mean you will 'come out' now Miss Borg?

You are nothing but a troll

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged