Australian Politics Forum - AGW Denialist Church Collapses

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 137969 Gender:	Re: AGW Denialist Church Collapses Reply #75 - Aug 20^th, 2013 at 1:37pm muso wrote on Aug 14^th, 2013 at 8:12pm: On the sticky threads I have presented some of that factual evidence. No, you've presented some of the evidence along with some opinions. Not "factual" evidence.
Back to top	IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: AGW Denialist Church Collapses
Reply #76 - Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:34pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 1:34pm:

# wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 11:36am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 15^th, 2013 at 4:23pm:

... AGW is not a "hard fact".

I'm still looking for the question, statement or implication in this thread to which that is a rational response.

You can stop looking:

"The point I made is that opinion is irrelevant. What is relevant is hard facts."

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1365821673/52#52

http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

Back to top

IP Logged

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: AGW Denialist Church Collapses Reply #77 - Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:35pm greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 1:37pm: muso wrote on Aug 14^th, 2013 at 8:12pm: On the sticky threads I have presented some of that factual evidence. No, you've presented some of the evidence along with some opinions. Not "factual" evidence. Denial ain't just dat river in Egypt.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137969
Gender: male

Re: AGW Denialist Church Collapses
Reply #78 - Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:37pm

# wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 1:37pm:

muso wrote on Aug 14^th, 2013 at 8:12pm:

On the sticky threads I have presented some of that factual evidence.

No, you've presented some of the evidence along with some opinions.

Not "factual" evidence.

Denial ain't just dat river in Egypt. Grin

Correct. The AGW cultists keep denying that their evidence isn't "factual".

That's exactly why they are losing more and more credibility each day.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137969
Gender: male

Re: AGW Denialist Church Collapses
Reply #79 - Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:38pm

# wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 1:34pm:

# wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 11:36am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 15^th, 2013 at 4:23pm:

... AGW is not a "hard fact".

I'm still looking for the question, statement or implication in this thread to which that is a rational response.

You can stop looking:

"The point I made is that opinion is irrelevant. What is relevant is hard facts."

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1365821673/52#52

http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

Ah, so now a website contains "hard facts"?

Keep trying.

Back to top

IP Logged

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: AGW Denialist Church Collapses Reply #80 - Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:46pm greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:38pm: # wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:34pm: ... http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php Ah, so now a website contains "hard facts"? Keep trying. So now you're saying that, because it's on a web site, it can't be hard fact? Are you trolling?
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137969
Gender: male

Re: AGW Denialist Church Collapses
Reply #81 - Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:50pm

# wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:46pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:38pm:

# wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:34pm:

...
http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

Ah, so now a website contains "hard facts"?

Keep trying.

So now you're saying that, because it's on a web site, it can't be hard fact?

Nope.

I'm saying that because it's on a web site, it isn't necessarily "hard fact".

See the difference?

That's another one of the problems with your religion (you don't like "cult", I know): you see something and immediately make an assumption based on your own bias, rather than taking the time to analyse the situation and consider it from all angles.

Back to top

IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: AGW Denialist Church Collapses
Reply #82 - Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:53pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:50pm:

...
I'm saying that because it's on a web site, it isn't necessarily "hard fact".
...

Point to anything on that site that isn't peer-reviewed science.

Of course, you'll have a climate science denier's perverse definition of "hard fact"; something that doesn't include science.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137969
Gender: male

Re: AGW Denialist Church Collapses
Reply #83 - Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:59pm

# wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:53pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:50pm:

...
I'm saying that because it's on a web site, it isn't necessarily "hard fact".
...

Point to anything on that site that isn't peer-reviewed science.

See, you keep making the same mistake over and over again.

Just because something is "peer-reviewed science", it doesn't mean that it's "hard fact".

Are you starting to understand yet?

Back to top

IP Logged

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: AGW Denialist Church Collapses Reply #84 - Aug 20^th, 2013 at 4:01pm greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:59pm: ... Just because something is "peer-reviewed science", it doesn't mean that it's "hard fact". Are you starting to understand yet? Oh, I understand alright. A dedicated denier can deny anything. As can a troll.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 137969 Gender:	Re: AGW Denialist Church Collapses Reply #85 - Aug 20^th, 2013 at 4:05pm # wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 4:01pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:59pm: ... Just because something is "peer-reviewed science", it doesn't mean that it's "hard fact". Are you starting to understand yet? Oh, I understand alright. Good. I knew hoped something would get through eventually.
Back to top	IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: AGW Denialist Church Collapses
Reply #86 - Aug 20^th, 2013 at 4:37pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 4:05pm:

# wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 4:01pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 3:59pm:

...
Just because something is "peer-reviewed science", it doesn't mean that it's "hard fact".

Are you starting to understand yet?

Oh, I understand alright.

...
I knew hoped something would get through eventually.

Oh, something got through alright.

You merely deny anything that's inconsistent with your beliefs. I see two possibilities.

If you're genuine, then you're insane. If you're not genuine, then you're trolling.

Back to top

IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: AGW Denialist Church Collapses
Reply #87 - Aug 20^th, 2013 at 4:47pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2013 at 1:37pm:

muso wrote on Aug 14^th, 2013 at 8:12pm:

On the sticky threads I have presented some of that factual evidence.

No, you've presented some of the evidence along with some opinions.

Not "factual" evidence.

A measurement of Longwave Infrared radiation from Space isn't factual?

Back to top