longweekend58 wrote on Apr 16
th, 2013 at 11:42pm:
if you've ever worked in a university you would know that it is THE left-wing organization in the country.
You're assuming there aren't any "fatcats" in universities. I am pretty sure academics who teach commerce or economics courses would be pretty right-wing, as anyone interested in running businesses and wants to make money would be. There's also the academics teaching law and you know how lawyers like to get rich by charging you lots of legal fees. It's amazing how a piece of paper with writing on it can earn you $10k-$100k. Lawyers love manipulating the world to make themselves richer and I doubt they're going to leave the money to the homeless. There you have it. Here are your right-wingers in universities.
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 16
th, 2013 at 11:42pm:
A friend of mine who worked in a uni was reprimanded for having a picture of Howard in his cubicle. Pictures of Keating however were acceptable.
You're basing your claim on the experience of a friend? Whoever said that to your friend was expressing their opinion and yet you assume they represent the entire university.
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 16
th, 2013 at 11:42pm:
But just as when people get older and wiser they abandon left-wing silliness so do students when they leave the rarefied air of universities.
That wasn't my experience. For me it was the other way round. While I was at university, I was too busy studying to care about what was happening in the rest of the world. Nothing else mattered except assignments, exams and marks and the pride I got when I handed in great work and got good marks. I was too interested in my own success to care about anything else (a right-wing attitude). Not all students care about politics.
Finishing my studies and leaving university was like taking off my rose-coloured glasses. I looked at the world around me and saw imperfection. Life wasn't as simple as getting the right answer on the exam. I realised I was a pretty lucky guy to be studying at university and free of debt. A lot of other people weren't so lucky, many of them having to borrow money to study. The reason why I was free of debt was because my family was free of debt. My parents paid off their mortgage a long, long time ago. My parents could afford to support me in my studies and I was a good saver.
I realised that if you came from a family who owned a home where the mortgage still hadn't been paid off, it was likely that the next generation would be facing the same problem. There was therefore a hierarchy. Below me were people having financial difficulties because of the failure to pay off their mortgage. Above me were people earning $100k or above who weren't willing to share the extra money they earned. These people were living "above their means." They had money they didn't need.
Successful people become blind to the hardships of people below them and continue accumulating wealth without caring. If I hadn't been struck down by a medical condition, I probably would have ended up with right-wing views. I have been blinded by my success once before and I don't intend to let that happen again. The reason why I am not a right-winger is because I am not a heartless person who doesn't have a penny to spare.
so you claim my position is invalid because it is my personal experience and then use as proof, your own experience???