Soren wrote on Apr 19
th, 2013 at 4:59pm:
Annie Anthrax wrote on Apr 19
th, 2013 at 11:58am:
Okay. That shouldn't have happened. My experience has been different, but my studies have been far shorter than yours - though probably broader.
I remember an essay I had to write where I asked to argue in opposition to what we had been taught in the course. The convenor said that was fine as long as I could support my argument with strong evidence. I got a HD, so was in no way penalised for not adhering to the accepted line of thought.
I am not arguing that the social sciences are not strongly geared to the left - I agree that they are. But the very nature of university study is primarily independent - students must seek knowledge beyond what is given in lectures, tutes and course readings for every assignment.
This is right as far as it goes.
There is no questioning, let alone opposition to multiculturalism, to cultural relativism, to post-modern relativising of all sorts. Not because there are no publications and books opposing these intellectual currents but because such books and journals are not on any of the university reading lists.
When I was studying arts, all of these things were introduced in some way and they were open to discussion. An example that springs immediately to mind is
Seasons of Migration to the North by Salih. I'm not sure if you've read it, but it's nothing if not a slam on multiculturalism and the difficulties of assimilation.
Soren wrote on Apr 19
th, 2013 at 4:59pm:
Your example is subtly telling: you were taught a certain line and were expressly asked to argue against the entire outlook of the semester's material.
No. t was me that asked. It was an essay on the manner in which Lurie in Coetzee's post-aparthieid novel
Disgrace had found redemption. I didn't (and don't) believe he had so I asked to argue that instead. My convenor was surprised, but made no attempt to change my mind and marked me fairly.
My point is, it is the responsibility of students to research thoroughly. This includes finding information, making sense of it and refuting it with evidence if they don't agree with it.
I'm studying psych now and it's a completely different teaching/learning style. That's why I made the distinction about humanities before. I can't think of a single thing that I've learnt in my psychology studies that has been geared toward either political direction.