Rider wrote on Jul 26
th, 2013 at 10:52am:
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jul 26
th, 2013 at 7:50am:
Rider wrote on Jul 26
th, 2013 at 7:10am:
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jul 26
th, 2013 at 6:50am:
Ajax wrote on Jul 25
th, 2013 at 10:54am:
muso wrote on Jul 24
th, 2013 at 9:27pm:
It's a variation of the "No warming since 1998" theme. Too short a period, plus cherry picking the time frame.
Muso there has been NO warming since 1998 when we had the El Nino, temperatures after 1998 have not surpassed the 1998 value.
Don't be silly. You have been fooled by the nonsense David Rose writes in the Daily Mail
THere has been warming since 1998.
It is clear and unambiguous
Ajax wrote on Jul 25
th, 2013 at 10:54am:
Unequivocal warming??????????......where???????...in their compuetr models...LOL
In the oceans and in the melting of ice caps and glaciers, idiot.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2013/jul/22/climate-change-slowdown-warming-oc... Soooooo....your tabloid source has a bigger dick than his tabloid source
No. My tabloid source actually referred to published science:
The heat content of the world ocean for the 0-700 m layer increased by 16.7x1022 J corresponding to a rate of 0.27 Wm-2 (per unit area of the world ocean) and a volume mean warming of 0.18ºC. The world ocean accounts for approximately 90% of the warming of the earth system that has occurred since 1955. The thermosteric component of sea level trend is 0.54 mm yr-1 for the 0-2000 m layer and 0.41 mm yr-1 for the 0-700 m layer of the world ocean for 1955-2010.http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/pip/2012GL051106.shtmlHis tabloid source was a silly opinion piece.
Do you understand the difference?
I do, do you know how many 10's of thousands of years it will take for ocean heat increase (naturally occurring or otherwise) to affect surface temperatures and induce any statistically significant anythingness??
Yes - I do know exactly how many 10's of thousands of years it will take for ocean heat increase (naturally occurring or otherwise) to induce any statistically significant anythingness.
And you were not so pig-ignorant and read my previous post - you may have been able to work out the answer too.
It will take exactly
ZERO 10's of thousands of years for ocean heat increase (naturally occurring or otherwise) to induce any statistically significant anythingness.
This is because very significant effects of the ocean warming are already being observed.
As I quoted in my last post:
The thermosteric component of sea level trend is 0.54 mm yr-1 for the 0-2000 m layer and 0.41 mm yr-1 for the 0-700 m layer of the world ocean for 1955-2010.http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/pip/2012GL051106.shtmlSea level rise.
Do you understand what that means?
It is happening now.
Not tens of thousands of years in the future.
Now.
It is caused by the thermal expansion of warming oceans.
Oceans warming due to the increased thermal energy being re-emited back to earth as a result of the increase in the concentration of anthropogenic greenhouse gasses.
Yet you and that other retard posting on here want to believe some idiot in the Daily Mail who thinks there has been "no warming since 1998"
Morons.
Rider wrote on Jul 26
th, 2013 at 10:52am:
There is absolutely no sane reason to be concerned. Time to put the boffins back in their boxes till they can come up with a cure for cancer or something that will actually bring benefit to mankind.
Sea level rise is no cause for concern?
I suspect that hundreds of millions of people around the world being impacted by larger storm surge events and a decline in groundwater quality would disagree with you.
Actually - there would be absolutely no sane reason for anyone to agree with you - idiot.