Jobs scheme at high risk of fraud: report    

Date
    April 22, 2013

Linton Besser


The $4.7 billion welfare-to-work scheme is at ''high risk'' of being defrauded by the government's designated employment agencies, according to a confidential federal government assessment.     

The assessment was ordered after an external audit of the Job Services Australia program last year identified more than $100 million in fees in just two years had been improperly claimed.    

Job Services Australia is designed to assist the long-term unemployed find work and it pays private employment agencies fees for finding jobs for, or otherwise assisting, Centrelink recipients.

The April 2012 review, which found only 42 per cent of the claims it examined were genuine, also prompted reform of the fees that can be claimed under the scheme, as well as fraud investigations into an unknown number of agencies.
Advertisement

But now, a December 2012 ''program risk plan'' has warned the program is ''likely'' to continue to be abused by the companies it contracts to assist the unemployed.

These providers may ''obtain unfair gains'', the document said, through ''claim of payments to which they are not entitled'' and the ''manipulation of records in relation to the provider's performance''. There was also a high risk such agencies might benefit from ''unauthorised access to confidential information'' available to them under the Job Services Australia program.

The plan proposes to address the risk of fraud through several measures, including ongoing risk assessment, clear guidelines and policies for the claiming of fees.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/jobs-scheme-at-high-risk-of-fraud-report-20130421-2i8b9.html#ixzz2R8HtsAJa

Job agencies facing fraud inquiry after audit of fees

Date
    April 21, 2012

Linton Besser



JUST 42 per cent of job-finding fees claimed by employment agencies were found to be genuine in a top-level audit released yesterday of the $4.7 billion welfare-to-work program.    

As a result, some Job Services Australia providers - private firms and charities contracted by the government to help the unemployed find work - face the prospect of a fraud investigation.

The inquiry suggests the job-assistance industry improperly lodged as much as $106 million worth of false claims from the taxpayer in the past two years. Of this, $25.3 million was the extra loading designed to encourage agencies to source jobs themselves for their clients.

The audit reveals that in one case 77 per cent of job brokerage fees claimed by a provider were false or could not be verified.    


But the government has refused to name the organisation along with the other nine providers who were targeted for the audit, citing commercial-in-confidence restrictions.

The audit, overseen by former public servant Robert Butterworth, ''found a significant incidence of poor administration, claims that could not be confirmed, claims that were not supported by appropriate evidence, and claims that were contradicted by job seekers or employers''.    

''Although providers in the audit were selected because they had a higher … claiming rate, it is almost certain that other providers who were not audited will have similar patterns of behaviour, though perhaps on a smaller scale.''

The Butterworth review examined only ''provider brokered outcomes'' - the fee paid when an employment agency actually finds a job for a Centrelink recipient, as opposed to just assisting that person. But there are 162 other kinds of fees that have been claimed by providers under the scheme.

Last month, the Employment Participation Minister, Kate Ellis, announced changes that her office said would reduce the number of fees available by almost half, and yesterday committed to implementing the nine recommendations made by the inquiry.

One of these recommendations is that the government investigate ''other areas of vulnerability'' within the program.

Insiders say the exploitation of a suite of loopholes has become a core part of the business of many organisations working within the program.

The Herald has seen evidence concerning the rorting of the scheme's Employment Pathways Fund, which is meant to pay for things like new clothing or training for job seekers to help them become work-ready, as well as wage subsidies paid to employers.    

Indeed, the audit released yesterday made a reference to such problems, adding that ''funds used from the Employment Pathway Fund will be recovered where expenditure was related to invalid brokering service elements''.

All firms contracted to the scheme will now have to verify claims they have lodged since last July. The government will only try to recover from each provider the incentive loading rather than the entire brokerage fee.

The audit used a sample of 14 providers and assessed 5 per cent of brokerage fees claimed in a six-month period last year.

''In a small number of instances,'' the report said, ''job seeker perspectives gave rise to concerns about provider behaviour that warrant further investigation.

''In addition to recovery and potential administrative action, these cases will be referred to the department's investigations area under the current fraud framework.''

The agencies' claims in these cases appeared ''to indicate an intention to create the basis for a false claim''.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/job-agencies-facing-fraud-inquiry-after-audit-of-fees-20120420-1xcfz.html#ixzz2RBB93eqt

Well there you have the problem. There arent enough jobs to go around.

SOB