Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts. (Read 1093 times)
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Apr 23rd, 2013 at 7:42am
 
In effect Abbott has endorsed Labor's plan to fund Gonski, but is would rather use the money to maintain welfare to high income earners than make the necessary investments in our education system.

Once again we get the pain without the efficiency benefits, the investment in human capital or the investment in infrastructure.

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/coalition-will-ditch-school-reforms...


Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #1 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 8:35am
 
MOTR wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 7:42am:
Once again we get the pain


Just who is 'we'.... not 'me'.

MOTR wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 7:42am:
but is would rather use the money to maintain welfare to high income earners than make the necessary investments in our education system.


What do you think Uni graduates will be Poindexter? Huh

YTF should my taxes pay for them?

They will graduate and be the ambulance chasers and the accountants and the union political classlets of the nation dreaming up more scams to rob the taxpayer....

Pay your own way pimples..... Sad

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #2 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 9:28am
 
The fundamental problem is once again how is it to be funded. It is just like Whitlam all over again with all these really cool ideas and not the foggiest idea of how to pay for them.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
RightSadFred
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2220
Gender: male
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #3 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 9:33am
 
longweekend58

Funding for tertiary education should be on a supply and demand basis and also targeted on the needs of Industry and business. Ultimately it does come down to affordability so given the mess the ALP has created no doubt there will be cuts to many areas, why would you think that Uni Funding be exempt from economic reality ?

All I see in this forum from the rusted ons is BS traps thrown around about what Abbott may or may not do...... clearly these ALP rusted ons have given up all hope in September.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #4 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 9:41am
 
what about the no more scholarships..that too has to be repaid now...nice.....

NOTHING BUT NOTHING IS EVER FREE..

and any clown that thinks otherwise.. lives in a different world to the rest of us..

I dont think going to Uni should be prohibitive either.otherwise they will end up full of students from POOR countries... and I dont think we need that either..

someone must find a balance where its fair and manageable..whats the system in  other countries???... why do we always end up.. with either its" free" or costs a mint..

we mustnt forget rudd and swan went to the free Uni.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
RightSadFred
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2220
Gender: male
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #5 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 9:56am
 
cods

I was a scholarship winner when I went to uni.

What everyone is forgetting is the Wran report into tertiary education, it proved the socio economic breakdown of uni students was unaffected by making tertiary education free.

People from lower incomes choose not to go to uni for reasons other than cost.

FYI yes it was commissioned by the ALP who brought in free tertiary education then took it away again.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26509
Australia
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #6 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 10:13am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 9:28am:
The fundamental problem is once again how is it to be funded. It is just like Whitlam all over again with all these really cool ideas and not the foggiest idea of how to pay for them.


It was easy for whitlam because the state had income sources. They have all been sold off now though . . . .

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #7 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 10:16am
 
RightSadFred wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 9:56am:
cods

I was a scholarship winner when I went to uni.

What everyone is forgetting is the Wran report into tertiary education, it proved the socio economic breakdown of uni students was unaffected by making tertiary education free.

People from lower incomes choose not to go to uni for reasons other than cost.

FYI yes it was commissioned by the ALP who brought in free tertiary education then took it away again.


That's interesting! I never knew that. I guess in hindsight it makes sense. If you really want to go to university, you will go  - fees or not. If you dont really want to go then you wont.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #8 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 10:19am
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 10:13am:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 9:28am:
The fundamental problem is once again how is it to be funded. It is just like Whitlam all over again with all these really cool ideas and not the foggiest idea of how to pay for them.


It was easy for whitlam because the state had income sources. They have all been sold off now though . . . .

SOB


you are presumably old enough top have been around in whitlams time but still you come up with this drivel. Whitlam implemented many programs that were unfunded or underfunded in a time of global economic uncertainty.  SOUND FAMILIAR?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
RightSadFred
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2220
Gender: male
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #9 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 10:41am
 
longweekend58

The ALP stench of hypocrisy on education goes back a long way.

One thing that I have noticed lately and I admit to missing it along the way, while many rusted on ALP MPs think Whitlam  was great, there are an equal number that think he was an idiot. Reading some articles from many ALP elders even from the left are critical of Whitlam. Its hard not to be, critical of that era anjd the GG decision was vindicated by a landslide victory by teh Liberal party.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #10 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 10:50am
 
RightSadFred wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 10:41am:
longweekend58

The ALP stench of hypocrisy on education goes back a long way.

One thing that I have noticed lately and I admit to missing it along the way, while many rusted on ALP MPs think Whitlam  was great, there are an equal number that think he was an idiot. Reading some articles from many ALP elders even from the left are critical of Whitlam. Its hard not to be, critical of that era anjd the GG decision was vindicated by a landslide victory by teh Liberal party.





the election result did vindicate what was a line-ball decision by the GG. Whiltlam was passionate eloquent and charismatic. He was however an idealist surrounded by fools.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26509
Australia
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #11 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 10:57am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 10:19am:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 10:13am:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 9:28am:
The fundamental problem is once again how is it to be funded. It is just like Whitlam all over again with all these really cool ideas and not the foggiest idea of how to pay for them.


It was easy for whitlam because the state had income sources. They have all been sold off now though . . . .

SOB


you are presumably old enough top have been around in whitlams time but still you come up with this drivel. Whitlam implemented many programs that were unfunded or underfunded in a time of global economic uncertainty.  SOUND FAMILIAR?


Nope. Explain.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #12 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 11:13am
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 10:13am:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 9:28am:
The fundamental problem is once again how is it to be funded. It is just like Whitlam all over again with all these really cool ideas and not the foggiest idea of how to pay for them.


It was easy for whitlam because the state had income sources. They have all been sold off now though . . . .

SOB




what income sources did you have in mind?????????

that havent been replaced with better and more efficient ways.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #13 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 3:27pm
 
Swagman wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 8:35am:
MOTR wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 7:42am:
Once again we get the pain


Just who is 'we'.... not 'me'.

MOTR wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 7:42am:
but is would rather use the money to maintain welfare to high income earners than make the necessary investments in our education system.


What do you think Uni graduates will be Poindexter? Huh

YTF should my taxes pay for them?

They will graduate and be the ambulance chasers and the accountants and the union political classlets of the nation dreaming up more scams to rob the taxpayer....

Pay your own way pimples..... Sad



By we I mean us, swaggie. We get the cuts to higher education but not the investment in primary and secondary education. We get NBN lite with few of the benefits but most of the costs. We get the massively expensive direct action policy without the microeconomic reform that comes from putting a price on carbon.

Two massively expensive lemons and cuts to higher education. I honestly can't remember a more short sighted political leader.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott no to reforms but yes to uni cuts.
Reply #14 - Apr 23rd, 2013 at 3:45pm
 
Quote:
microeconomic reform that comes from putting a price on carbon.


Impact not "reform"

MOTR wrote on Apr 23rd, 2013 at 3:27pm:
By we I mean us, swaggie. We get the cuts to higher education but not the investment in primary and secondary education


No kids in school and none in Uni for me Motty

I'd prefer the rebates...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print