|dev|null wrote on May 21^st, 2013 at 10:34am:


A variety of opinions have been tolerated here over the years and whether we like them or not - they are accepted unless a member becomes obsessed with another member or breaks the rules such as posting porn or other illegal material or they become excessively abusive.

Herbert is a good writer and that can be irritating to some people, because a literate person can be clever with words whilst an illiterate person is only able to post abuse in response.

He doesn't appear to be trolling anyone - but you do? Surely there must be some threads here where you actually find the subject interesting, not the poster, and you can make an informed contribution?

mantra wrote on May 21^st, 2013 at 11:21am:


Well said. That's the sort of challenge he likes least of all because it then puts HIM in the firing-line for ad hominem abuse for having offered opinions that others might be able to refute convincingly, and with links.

When you're a child ~ you have to win every game.

When you're an adult, the thought of losing a round or two to your detractors is all part of the fun.

HB? ~ Grow up and take your knocks like the rest of us.

Calling me a 'stupid old man' is the sort of petulance one expects from a spoilt brat who has little more than insult and invective in his tiny little tool box.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 20^th, 2013 at 5:34pm:


And pray tell, Herbie what is wrong with the reborn Debate and Relate?

This is your first complaint about the forum.  You were unable to login for some time 'cause you refused to follow the instructions on the screen in front of you.

Now you're complaining about the aesthetics? 

I suspect the reality is you can't cope with a forum where the rules are enforced...   

I see you're still playing the man and not the ball, Brian. It really gets so damn tiresome and pointless.

Now off you go, there's a good chap.

Your D&R has been refusing my password. The software is junk.

And then I see Sappho is getting a finger-wagging from Mulga Bill for attempting to 'moderate' someone's attitude. You've got to be joking, Brian. Sappho is a class act ~ one of the best, and yet being the idiot that you are you want to give her reason to quit the board.

It's the same here. It's mainly a bunch of kids texting each other. The only original talent here is Warrigal.

And if you must know, I'm looking for a new board to join. Except for a handful of them here they're nearly all teenage texters who struggle mightily to construct even the simplest of sentences, and seem to be incapable of responding to my posts with anything other than one-liner abusive ad hominems.

(The Gonsky Report is bullshit. All the resources are already there. The only problem is the content and the methodology being employed).

Lord Herbert wrote on May 23^rd, 2013 at 7:00am:


Sensei, please do not go where others fear to tread!  Stormfront is not for you, they would cut your heart out, rather than let you snow them!  Tell your devoted follower where you are going so that I may again sit at your feet and learn the way of the Troll!  Which Bodhi tree will you sit under in future?   

Shall we have another 'Usual Suspects' news update, Hot Breath?

"Why not?" you say, holding a gun to my head.

"So okay... chill out", I say, a few beads of perspiration appearing on my forehead ... 

Quote:


Notice how the Left is in cohoots with the West's enemies? In bed with them without actually saying so. Giving them moral support and tacit approval by hiding their identities for as long as possible?

The next holocaust is going to be a humdinger.

source

|dev|null wrote on May 24^th, 2013 at 2:48pm:


Are opportunities for trolling getting a little scarce over there at the new Leftwing-run D&R site?

Brian Ross wrote on May 25^th, 2013 at 3:33pm:


My answer is that they are a godsend to all those on the Left who can use them as the ugly face of 'Rightwing' politics.

I don't support them any more than does Pat Condell. They are an embarrassment to those of us who stand in the middle of the political spectrum asking only that our ancestral homelands be saved for the generational indigenous Brits and their future progeny.

You support the Australian aborigines in this endeavour ~ so why not the Brits, Brian?

The Brits are no longer the majority people in their own capital city.

John Cleese admitted publicly that London is no longer recognisable as an English city. He now intentionally takes his UK holidays in Bristol where there is still the feeling that one is in an English city.

I think that's fairly appalling. This says to me that the immigration programme of the past 50 years has been a betrayal of the British people.

Some quotes from an article in the British press:

"In London, the transformation has been so rapid that less than half the population now describe themselves as white British".


"Poll after poll over the past ten years has shown that most people (immigrants included) are worried about the speed and size of the influx. And yet no one in government — which in this context means the Labour Government, which allowed mass immigration — took a blind bit of notice".


"There is patchy, though compelling evidence that Labour spoke with a forked tongue, and had a secret agenda. Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Mr Blair, Mr Brown and Jack Straw, has written that Labour threw open Britain’s borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a ‘truly multicultural country’.

Its chief motive may have been electoral. Migrants, and to a slightly lesser extent their descendants, are much more likely to vote Labour than for any other party. So, according to this theory, the Labour Party was furtively trying to increase its powerbase".


"Then there are the diaries of Chris Mullin, a former Labour minister, who in 2004 lamented the failure of the Government to tackle immigration abuses such as ‘the rackets that surround arranged marriages’ before noting that ‘at least 20 Labour seats depend on Asian votes’."

"Whatever the explanation, it is certain that Labour acted in a way that was contrary to the wishes of most of the population, whose concerns grew year by year as unchecked immigration, particularly in London and the South-East, put ever greater pressure on housing, land, schools, hospital care and other services.

This was a kind of betrayal — a betrayal of ordinary people by the ruling class. And also by the media class. For with one or two honourable exceptions such as the Mail, newspapers did not question government policy. As for the BBC, it treated moderate critics of mass immigration almost as though they were racist".

"But be in no doubt that a historic change took place in the first decade of this century that will transform Britain for ever. Without the people being consulted, without any debate, without even the Labour government admitting what was going on, there was a quiet, yet seismic revolution. There can be no going back".


source

And you wonder, Brian, why people like me are motivated to speak out against the Leftwing policies that have been instrumental in disenfranchising Australians and Brits of their own homelands.