Brian Ross wrote on May 26^th, 2013 at 1:55pm:


Well, actually, no, Brian. When I was in Devonshire and Berkshire during the '50's everyone was native to the British Isles and Ireland.

No one was a foreigner except the tourists.

All white.

All Christian.

All generational.

All indigenous to the British Isles and Ireland.

All rowing in the same direction.

No one talking about "Strength in Diversity" ~ and "We are one but we are Many" ~ and "Multicultural Britain" ~ and 'cultural sensitivity' training for the police, the teachers, and the politicians..

And no one pointing the finger and accusing others of 'racism' - 'bigotry' - and 'xenophobia'.

And British soldiers being told not to wear their uniforms in public in their own homeland lest this inflame passions of murderous hatred from members of the community. 

Brian Ross wrote on May 26^th, 2013 at 1:55pm:
 

There are the faux-'British' immigrants such as the Jamaicans, and then there are the core British people.

The immigrants will become solidly 'British' only when eventually, after however many generations, they will start barracking for the England sporting teams instead of being cheer-squads for visiting teams arriving from their ancestral homelands.

At present the Negroes in England will barrack for ANY foreign Negroes ... the Pakis will vote for ANY visiting Muslim teams ... etc etc

It's as simple as that. It's a Litmus test of where their loyalties lie, and who they identify with.

At present there are fourth and fifth generation migrants to Britain who gather at the sporting events to cheer on the West Indians, or the Pakistanis, or the Indians, etc.

Get the picture, Brian?

Institutionalised 'Multiculturalism' is a crock. It sponsors generational alienation of immigrant communities from the mainstream host people.

John Cleese was university-educated, and as such, was a freak for remaining disenchanted with leftwing ideology. Same with Mr Bean's Rowan Atkinson ~ a rightwinger.

But please note: It's NOT 'rightwing' to object  to your country being swamped by unassimilable immigrant foreigners.

Brian Ross wrote on May 26^th, 2013 at 5:11pm:


Speaking of rejection ... Your D&R is now no longer accepting my password.

I've been trying to get in so I can join the pillow-fight between Redneck, Nicole, and Mulga Bill! 

You can't possibly believe this new D&R has a hope in Hell of success with such Rightwing moderating of the posts? 

Rightwing intolerance of people's personal idiosyncrasies is not going to cut it. This bigoted editing of people's posts is almost on a par with racism and xenophobia.

The whole site reeks of Rightwing fascism.

I'm sorely disappointed in you, Brian. Where are all those liberal values you once used to champion?

Bugger off, Brian.

********

Someone here suggested that Waleed Aly would make a good leader for Australia's 'moderate' Muslims ~~ and I said "You must be joking" - or something to that effect.

Here's more reason for believing this TV-whore and show-boater is a phoney so far as being on the side of the West against Islamic aggressors in the Middle East.

Quote:


I rest my case. Just another snake-in-the-grass.

source

Lord Herbert wrote on May 31^st, 2013 at 9:04pm:


What's wrong, Herbie?  Too close to the truth?   

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 1^st, 2013 at 10:50am:


No. The point was to warn against the type of warfare that gives the illusion of zero risk and minimal cost. The belief that war can be a "win-win" is a very dangerous situation - and makes other nations (including muslim nations) want to get on board. The context of this danger is the proliferation of drone technology by the Chinese at a fraction of the cost of the American version. In the long term this proliferation of war, and new arms race will suck for the US just as much as for the muslim world.

did you read his piece on the Sydney protests?

Also, I assume you have some evidence that he forced his wife to convert to islam?

so I guess thats a no then.