mantra wrote on Apr 27^th, 2013 at 11:25am:


Your article says he went missing on March 16th which was how long before this Islamic terrorist attack?

Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 27^th, 2013 at 12:38pm:


Good observation. I missed that. Lucky for him anyway if he managed to die before the witch hunt. His death might have been more unpleasant.

brumbie wrote Quote:


Said muslims were following islam / allah / muhammad / qur'an to the very letter.

They were true believers.

A given fact is that if a:

Buddhist followed the teachings of Buddha to the very letter, Buddhists would claim him to be a good person.

Confucian followed the teachings of Confucius to the letter, to Confucians he would be a good person.

Shintoist followed the teachings of Shinto to the very letter,Shintoists would accept him as a good person.

Hindu closely followed the teachings of Hinduism, to Hindus he would be a good person.

Christian followed the teachings of Christ to the letter, all Christians would recognize him as a good person.

Only muslims who follow closely the conglomeration of islam / allah / muhammad / qur'an are considered malevolent evil people.

How long before muslims and their apologists will have to admit this truth?

Of course this truth will destroy islam, that is what has got them running scared.

muslims and their apologists would sooner see people die at the hands of the pure believers, than admit the truth.

Yeas....these Muslims are doing the worst!


Now, Herbert GTFO or watch me bombard this Thread with similar 'usual suspect' facts.

You have a ship, Titanic I believe, leaving on the tide.  Joan Baez is the live entertainment.  How about you get on it while you can still leg it to the Quay?

mantra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2013 at 10:09am:


Herbert is here for one reason only, and that is as a  'fisher of men.'  Even he was not.......why ought I (or anyone) allow these Muslim bashers get away with their Muslim bashing?  They seem to never mention suspects of a non Muslim kind.

Was Martin Bryant a Muslim?

mantra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2013 at 4:20pm:


Are you sure you're not resorting to gross exaggeration here as an all-embracing blunderbuss buck-shot strategy for avoiding having to answer the specifics of what the anti-Muslims say about the inadvisability of Australia conducting a Muslim immigration program?

Does it not tell you something that so far 20 Muslims have been locked up in maximum security prisons before they had a chance to gun-down soldiers at Holsworthy Army base, and set off bombs with the intention of creating mass murder upon Australian citizens?

Is there a message there for our future immigration and refugees policy?

Do you have a Loved One in Australia who could fall victim to a Muslim bomb?

Is it first necessary for you to have personal experience of deadly jihad before changing your mind from your current benign attitude to one of realising the Enemy has been allowed to take up residence within our own homeland society like rats in a silo?

Aussie wrote on Apr 28^th, 2013 at 6:28pm:


Ideally, that would be the case.