Australian Politics Forum - Gillard growing and growing as PM.

Back to OzPolitic.com

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Federal Politics › Gillard growing and growing as PM.

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 2 3

Send Topic

Print

Gillard growing and growing as PM. (Read 1567 times)

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM.
Reply #15 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 12:37am

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Apr 25^th, 2013 at 7:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Apr 25^th, 2013 at 4:28pm:

Gillard lost the confidence of the Australian people long ago when Abbott and his shock jock mates began their campaign of "search and destroy."

Abbott and his "shock jock mates" hated Kevin Rudd with as much passion and are as anti-Rudd.

Yet -

1) Kevin Rudd remains the number 1 choice of the Australian people for Prime Minister

2) Julia Gillard has led Labor to its worst polling in opinion poll history and trailed the Coalition for its entire term.

Therefore, is Gillard not the issue??

"Obamacare is the most shocking display of political arrogance forced upon this country in a century. It's time Washington listened to everyday people for a change."

This quote proves Andrei as unable to come to grips with what Government is: a social institution!

Markets- regulated markets as there is no such thing as a free market anywhere except in your head- provide goods and services for the people but Governments provide goods and services for the markets to even exist via taxes.

Andrei is just one those hotshots who can't accept that a bloke named Anthrax dropped the mighty american ego on the casino floor and forgot to yawn!

"Obamacare is the most shocking display of political arrogance forced upon this country in a century. It's time Washington listened to everyday people for a change."

This quote proves Andrei as unable to come to grips with what Government is: a social institution!

Markets- regulated markets as there is no such thing as a free market anywhere except in your head- provide goods and services for the people but Governments provide goods and services for the markets to even exist via taxes.

Andrei is just one those hotshots who can't accept that a bloke named Anthrax dropped the mighty american ego on the casino floor and forgot to yawn!

"Obamacare is the most shocking display of political arrogance forced upon this country in a century. It's time Washington listened to everyday people for a change."

This quote proves Andrei as unable to come to grips with what Government is: a social institution!

Markets- regulated markets as there is no such thing as a free market anywhere except in your head- provide goods and services for the people but Governments provide goods and services for the markets to even exist via taxes.

Andrei is just one those hotshots who can't accept that a bloke named Anthrax dropped the mighty american ego on the casino floor and forgot to yawn!

"Obamacare is the most shocking display of political arrogance forced upon this country in a century. It's time Washington listened to everyday people for a change."

This quote proves Andrei as unable to come to grips with what Government is: a social institution!

Markets- regulated markets as there is no such thing as a free market anywhere except in your head- provide goods and services for the people but Governments provide goods and services for the markets to even exist via taxes.

Andrei is just one those hotshots who can't accept that a bloke named Anthrax dropped the mighty american ego on the casino floor and forgot to yawn!

"Obamacare is the most shocking display of political arrogance forced upon this country in a century. It's time Washington listened to everyday people for a change."

This quote proves Andrei as unable to come to grips with what Government is: a social institution!

Markets- regulated markets as there is no such thing as a free market anywhere except in your head- provide goods and services for the people but Governments provide goods and services for the markets to even exist via taxes.

Andrei is just one those hotshots who can't accept that a bloke named Anthrax dropped the mighty american ego on the casino floor and forgot to yawn!

"Obamacare is the most shocking display of political arrogance forced upon this country in a century. It's time Washington listened to everyday people for a change."

This quote proves Andrei as unable to come to grips with what Government is: a social institution!

Markets- regulated markets as there is no such thing as a free market anywhere except in your head- provide goods and services for the people but Governments provide goods and services for the markets to even exist via taxes.

Andrei is just one those hotshots who can't accept that a bloke named Anthrax dropped the mighty american ego on the casino floor and forgot to yawn!

"Obamacare is the most shocking display of political arrogance forced upon this country in a century. It's time Washington listened to everyday people for a change."

This quote proves Andrei as unable to come to grips with what Government is: a social institution!

Markets- regulated markets as there is no such thing as a free market anywhere except in your head- provide goods and services for the people but Governments provide goods and services for the markets to even exist via taxes.

Andrei is just one those hotshots who can't accept that a bloke named Anthrax dropped the mighty american ego on the casino floor and forgot to yawn!

We've all dealt with people like Andrei and laughed when they got smashed at the pub: good 4 lulz but

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM.
Reply #16 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 2:10am

*****shakes head*******

Even getting past the desperation in this original thread from one of our most desperate.... Who the hell wants a PM that takes all of their term to come good.

That tells me that she did what she wanted. Fked the country and now wants another term to finish the job.

Get off the grass with this crap greens.

IP Logged

Mnemonic

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1530
Melbourne
Gender: male

male

Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM.
Reply #17 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 3:15am

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 2:10am:

Even getting past the desperation in this original thread from one of our most desperate.... Who the hell wants a PM that takes all of their term to come good.

Exactly. It doesn't matter what this government is achieving now, even if it's good. We just don't care anymore.

After 2.5 years of bad polls, nobody cares enough to vote for Julia anymore. She's gone.

I am not impressed, especially when I hear about (1) removal of discounts for upfront payment of HECS fees, (2) cutting support for single mothers, (3) still giving too much funding to private schools and (4) having your treasurer say it's no longer worthwhile to get a budget surplus and then continuing to cut costs anyway!!!!

You're playing a game of tennis. It's 2 sets to Love and you're not doing anything to win this one. You continue to double-fault and lose points. Hardly a way to win the match is it?

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34882
Gender: male

male

Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM.
Reply #18 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 6:32am

Mnemonic wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 3:15am:

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 2:10am:

Even getting past the desperation in this original thread from one of our most desperate.... Who the hell wants a PM that takes all of their term to come good.

Exactly. It doesn't matter what this government is achieving now, even if it's good. We just don't care anymore.

After 2.5 years of bad polls, nobody cares enough to vote for Julia anymore. She's gone.

I am not impressed, especially when I hear about (1) removal of discounts for upfront payment of HECS fees, (2) cutting support for single mothers, (3) still giving too much funding to private schools and (4) having your treasurer say it's no longer worthwhile to get a budget surplus and then continuing to cut costs anyway!!!!

You're playing a game of tennis. It's 2 sets to Love and you're not doing anything to win this one. You continue to double-fault and lose points. Hardly a way to win the match is it?

good post mnemonic.
short of tony tearing an achilles or a hammie, he just needs to play out the match.
still he is a doofus so anything is possible.
i find no difference between julia and tony on where they want to take the country and i find her voice annoying and he is an orator of very low quality.
it amazes me that 2 such low quality people are fighting out the final at wimbleton.
how did this happen. Wink

Wink

Wink

its very rare that i am vexxed , but i truly find this a vexxing question.

whitlam,hayden, fraser, hawke, keating, howard, costello. these people were at least seeded in the top 100. one could enjoy watching a tennis match between a keating and a hewson.

but abbott v gillard on centre court. OMFG Wink

Wink

no one would turn up for that.

they shouldnt have even got a wild card entry into the tournament

IP Logged

RightSadFred

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2220
Gender: male

male

Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM.
Reply #19 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 8:36am

TheGreenLight

Are you seriously asking this question of a union planted stooge who has done more damage to the ALP brand that anyone else I can recall and has produced the worse polling figures I can recall against an apparently unelectable Abbott ?

Let me ask a question of you...... if I said 10 years ago that Abbott will be walking into the job of PM with polling figures opposition leaders only dream of what would you think ?

That has to be mostly credited to Gillard, but to be fair Swan and rest played their part in destroying the ALP brand.

Gillard and the ALP ..... including Rudd ..... have behaved like an opposition party in government, in no way has the ALP looked comfortable in government, most of the damage has been self inflicted.

IP Logged

salad in

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5941

Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM.
Reply #20 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 8:41am

cods wrote on Apr 25^th, 2013 at 4:28pm:

think he was confused by the Rooty Hills experiment.. where she didnt actually meet any locals..it got close a couple of times.. but that was all.

And what a joke that turned out to be. She could have taken the time to go with local ALP stooge Ed Husic and talk with the hospital manager at MT Druitt. The hospital is in need of an MRI machine. Instead she left her Rooty Hill bunker and a few weeks later announced a $21 million gift to the Disney company to shoot a movie in Oz. So much for her caring attitude towards the people of the West.

The ALP, the progressive party, the party of ideas, the workers' friend, is the only Australian political party to roast four young Australians in roof cavities. SHAME! SHAME! SHAME!

IP Logged

RightSadFred

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2220
Gender: male

male

Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM.
Reply #21 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 8:48am

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 2:10am:

*****shakes head*******

Even getting past the desperation in this original thread from one of our most desperate.... Who the hell wants a PM that takes all of their term to come good.

That tells me that she did what she wanted. Fked the country and now wants another term to finish the job.

Get off the grass with this crap greens.

Excellent point, I agree a certain latitude should e given to a new PM but given the back stabbing way she stole the job, then made unpublished dirty deals with people most don't care for ...... and we are expected to feel the need to let her have another term because she is getting better ? ..... if she wanted the job so badly then she gets no latitude, in fact from the start she will be judged more harshly..... and not because she is female but because she is an incompetent lying idiot.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

male

Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM.
Reply #22 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:20pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 12:26am:

I do think that history will shine a different colour on this government and it's achievements but in present day this lot couldn't sell an Anzac badge on Anzac day. The problem is they have had very very stupid advice and on some level have made some terrible policy decisions.

Let's look at a few examples:

1. Tony and turnbull announce an nbn alternative policy. It's crap. The business groups say its crap and the independent experts say it's crap. But what does the government do? Try release their attack dog conroy, who is a wanker and despised in the electorate. Gillard, not really a mention. This is the first fully funded policy announced by the coalition, announced by tony, and instead of all the ministers beginning a campaign against it they let conroy, a man who is dull and noone listens to, do all the talking. Then, the next day they decide it's more important to talk about a fast rail link between Melbourne and Brisbane; something that will cost billions as will never happen. Sorry... But WTF??????? Where's the political sense? Where is it, to realize the last thing you want to talk about is a futuristic project that will cost billions? Why not attack a stupid policy by a self confessed "non tech-head?"

2. Media reforms. Good idea in principle yet no consultation at all and a measure included in the policy that can only send warning bells: a ministe appointed individual to oversee the regulation. Not only does it play towards liberals campaign that labor are full of bureaucratic union officials embroiled in corruption, but in general it's a very very bad idea. WTF??????

3. Gonski. Experts claiming the policy had very poor consultation and even Gonski himself rejected their policy. WTF????? How can they lose on education to a barking chihuahua screaming Conski and that's it????

4. Asylum seekers. Enaging in The fight to the bottom of the barrel, to capture the hopes and dreams of xenophobics around the country. WTF??????

5. Mining tax. Poor design because of "negotiations" that turned a good policy into a WTF????

6. Calling a fixed price on carbon a carbon tax. It's like they wanted to lose a fight against the nutjobs like Allen and tony.

7. Allowing tony to go on tv and say, "I'm sorry but we will all have to share the pain and lose some benefits we've all grown accustomed to." yet, superannuation changes to the top 1% is bad bad bad and superannuation tax changes to 3.4 million of the lowest paid is good good good. WTF??? Where are you labor???? If a person is going to vote tony who is in the 3.4 million then you know you've lost. Especially of they agree they should burden the pain, but the wealthiest should still get a benefit. WTF???????????????????

It's almost like we agree with tony that poor people existed in Jesus's time so it's only normal. Seriously...WTF?????

Labor lost the plot not just because of some poor policies. They just can't sell anything and aren't politically astute enough to realize when to capitalise. Howard was a magician at it. Gillard is woeful.

a great number of analysts say the policy is good - not crap. There are some who hate it but also some who think it is great. It is just wrong to say that the majority say it is crap. But it sounds a lot like the argument for the carbon tax. 'experts' love it but everyone else hates it so we conclude that 'the carbon tax is loved'.

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

male

Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM.
Reply #23 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:27pm

longweekend58 wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:20pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 12:26am:

I do think that history will shine a different colour on this government and it's achievements but in present day this lot couldn't sell an Anzac badge on Anzac day. The problem is they have had very very stupid advice and on some level have made some terrible policy decisions.

Let's look at a few examples:

1. Tony and turnbull announce an nbn alternative policy. It's crap. The business groups say its crap and the independent experts say it's crap. But what does the government do? Try release their attack dog conroy, who is a wanker and despised in the electorate. Gillard, not really a mention. This is the first fully funded policy announced by the coalition, announced by tony, and instead of all the ministers beginning a campaign against it they let conroy, a man who is dull and noone listens to, do all the talking. Then, the next day they decide it's more important to talk about a fast rail link between Melbourne and Brisbane; something that will cost billions as will never happen. Sorry... But WTF??????? Where's the political sense? Where is it, to realize the last thing you want to talk about is a futuristic project that will cost billions? Why not attack a stupid policy by a self confessed "non tech-head?"

2. Media reforms. Good idea in principle yet no consultation at all and a measure included in the policy that can only send warning bells: a ministe appointed individual to oversee the regulation. Not only does it play towards liberals campaign that labor are full of bureaucratic union officials embroiled in corruption, but in general it's a very very bad idea. WTF??????

3. Gonski. Experts claiming the policy had very poor consultation and even Gonski himself rejected their policy. WTF????? How can they lose on education to a barking chihuahua screaming Conski and that's it????

4. Asylum seekers. Enaging in The fight to the bottom of the barrel, to capture the hopes and dreams of xenophobics around the country. WTF??????

5. Mining tax. Poor design because of "negotiations" that turned a good policy into a WTF????

6. Calling a fixed price on carbon a carbon tax. It's like they wanted to lose a fight against the nutjobs like Allen and tony.

7. Allowing tony to go on tv and say, "I'm sorry but we will all have to share the pain and lose some benefits we've all grown accustomed to." yet, superannuation changes to the top 1% is bad bad bad and superannuation tax changes to 3.4 million of the lowest paid is good good good. WTF??? Where are you labor???? If a person is going to vote tony who is in the 3.4 million then you know you've lost. Especially of they agree they should burden the pain, but the wealthiest should still get a benefit. WTF???????????????????

It's almost like we agree with tony that poor people existed in Jesus's time so it's only normal. Seriously...WTF?????

Labor lost the plot not just because of some poor policies. They just can't sell anything and aren't politically astute enough to realize when to capitalise. Howard was a magician at it. Gillard is woeful.

a great number of analysts say the policy is good - not crap. There are some who hate it but also some who think it is great. It is just wrong to say that the majority say it is crap. But it sounds a lot like the argument for the carbon tax. 'experts' love it but everyone else hates it so we conclude that 'the carbon tax is loved'.

Hmmmm I tried googling your claim and yet can't seem to locate much "good" analysis. Perhaps you can substantiate your claim with more than your word? Especially since we know your a prone to stretching the truth.

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

gizmo_2655 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 16010 South West NSW Gender:	Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM. Reply #24 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:36pm TheGreenLight wrote on Apr 25^th, 2013 at 3:55pm: Is it just me, or has Gillard really been growing and growing into the role of Prime Minister? I was a big Rudd fan (and still am) and was very angry when he was deposed, Yes, It's JUST you..
Back to top	"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition. It's similar to a strawman fallacy" Bobbythebat IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

male

Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM.
Reply #25 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:36pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:20pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 12:26am:

I do think that history will shine a different colour on this government and it's achievements but in present day this lot couldn't sell an Anzac badge on Anzac day. The problem is they have had very very stupid advice and on some level have made some terrible policy decisions.

Let's look at a few examples:

1. Tony and turnbull announce an nbn alternative policy. It's crap. The business groups say its crap and the independent experts say it's crap. But what does the government do? Try release their attack dog conroy, who is a wanker and despised in the electorate. Gillard, not really a mention. This is the first fully funded policy announced by the coalition, announced by tony, and instead of all the ministers beginning a campaign against it they let conroy, a man who is dull and noone listens to, do all the talking. Then, the next day they decide it's more important to talk about a fast rail link between Melbourne and Brisbane; something that will cost billions as will never happen. Sorry... But WTF??????? Where's the political sense? Where is it, to realize the last thing you want to talk about is a futuristic project that will cost billions? Why not attack a stupid policy by a self confessed "non tech-head?"

2. Media reforms. Good idea in principle yet no consultation at all and a measure included in the policy that can only send warning bells: a ministe appointed individual to oversee the regulation. Not only does it play towards liberals campaign that labor are full of bureaucratic union officials embroiled in corruption, but in general it's a very very bad idea. WTF??????

3. Gonski. Experts claiming the policy had very poor consultation and even Gonski himself rejected their policy. WTF????? How can they lose on education to a barking chihuahua screaming Conski and that's it????

4. Asylum seekers. Enaging in The fight to the bottom of the barrel, to capture the hopes and dreams of xenophobics around the country. WTF??????

5. Mining tax. Poor design because of "negotiations" that turned a good policy into a WTF????

6. Calling a fixed price on carbon a carbon tax. It's like they wanted to lose a fight against the nutjobs like Allen and tony.

7. Allowing tony to go on tv and say, "I'm sorry but we will all have to share the pain and lose some benefits we've all grown accustomed to." yet, superannuation changes to the top 1% is bad bad bad and superannuation tax changes to 3.4 million of the lowest paid is good good good. WTF??? Where are you labor???? If a person is going to vote tony who is in the 3.4 million then you know you've lost. Especially of they agree they should burden the pain, but the wealthiest should still get a benefit. WTF???????????????????

It's almost like we agree with tony that poor people existed in Jesus's time so it's only normal. Seriously...WTF?????

Labor lost the plot not just because of some poor policies. They just can't sell anything and aren't politically astute enough to realize when to capitalise. Howard was a magician at it. Gillard is woeful.

a great number of analysts say the policy is good - not crap. There are some who hate it but also some who think it is great. It is just wrong to say that the majority say it is crap. But it sounds a lot like the argument for the carbon tax. 'experts' love it but everyone else hates it so we conclude that 'the carbon tax is loved'.

Hmmmm I tried googling your claim and yet can't seem to locate much "good" analysis. Perhaps you can substantiate your claim with more than your word? Especially since we know your a prone to stretching the truth.

we discussed this when the policy was released. Turnball got a lot of very positive press for the policy. You don't have to like it or agree with it but you don't get to make the claim that experts believe it to be crap. An AMG Mercedes is better than my car. it doesn't therefore make my car crap. It does however make it affordable.

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM.
Reply #26 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:40pm

salad in wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 8:41am:

cods wrote on Apr 25^th, 2013 at 4:28pm:

think he was confused by the Rooty Hills experiment.. where she didnt actually meet any locals..it got close a couple of times.. but that was all.

And what a joke that turned out to be. She could have taken the time to go with local ALP stooge Ed Husic and talk with the hospital manager at MT Druitt. The hospital is in need of an MRI machine. Instead she left her Rooty Hill bunker and a few weeks later announced a $21 million gift to the Disney company to shoot a movie in Oz. So much for her caring attitude towards the people of the West.

it is a labor thing to keep on the right side of so called celebrities who will forget rudds fawning over Cate Blanchett. it was nauseating...and gillard all but dips a curtsy to Obama..

its labors way of saying they are creating jobs.. even though they may only last 3 months.its all illusion... pity about the DEBT.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

male

Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM.
Reply #27 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:42pm

longweekend58 wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:36pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:20pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 26^th, 2013 at 12:26am:

I do think that history will shine a different colour on this government and it's achievements but in present day this lot couldn't sell an Anzac badge on Anzac day. The problem is they have had very very stupid advice and on some level have made some terrible policy decisions.

Let's look at a few examples:

1. Tony and turnbull announce an nbn alternative policy. It's crap. The business groups say its crap and the independent experts say it's crap. But what does the government do? Try release their attack dog conroy, who is a wanker and despised in the electorate. Gillard, not really a mention. This is the first fully funded policy announced by the coalition, announced by tony, and instead of all the ministers beginning a campaign against it they let conroy, a man who is dull and noone listens to, do all the talking. Then, the next day they decide it's more important to talk about a fast rail link between Melbourne and Brisbane; something that will cost billions as will never happen. Sorry... But WTF??????? Where's the political sense? Where is it, to realize the last thing you want to talk about is a futuristic project that will cost billions? Why not attack a stupid policy by a self confessed "non tech-head?"

2. Media reforms. Good idea in principle yet no consultation at all and a measure included in the policy that can only send warning bells: a ministe appointed individual to oversee the regulation. Not only does it play towards liberals campaign that labor are full of bureaucratic union officials embroiled in corruption, but in general it's a very very bad idea. WTF??????

3. Gonski. Experts claiming the policy had very poor consultation and even Gonski himself rejected their policy. WTF????? How can they lose on education to a barking chihuahua screaming Conski and that's it????

4. Asylum seekers. Enaging in The fight to the bottom of the barrel, to capture the hopes and dreams of xenophobics around the country. WTF??????

5. Mining tax. Poor design because of "negotiations" that turned a good policy into a WTF????

6. Calling a fixed price on carbon a carbon tax. It's like they wanted to lose a fight against the nutjobs like Allen and tony.

7. Allowing tony to go on tv and say, "I'm sorry but we will all have to share the pain and lose some benefits we've all grown accustomed to." yet, superannuation changes to the top 1% is bad bad bad and superannuation tax changes to 3.4 million of the lowest paid is good good good. WTF??? Where are you labor???? If a person is going to vote tony who is in the 3.4 million then you know you've lost. Especially of they agree they should burden the pain, but the wealthiest should still get a benefit. WTF???????????????????

It's almost like we agree with tony that poor people existed in Jesus's time so it's only normal. Seriously...WTF?????

Labor lost the plot not just because of some poor policies. They just can't sell anything and aren't politically astute enough to realize when to capitalise. Howard was a magician at it. Gillard is woeful.

a great number of analysts say the policy is good - not crap. There are some who hate it but also some who think it is great. It is just wrong to say that the majority say it is crap. But it sounds a lot like the argument for the carbon tax. 'experts' love it but everyone else hates it so we conclude that 'the carbon tax is loved'.

Hmmmm I tried googling your claim and yet can't seem to locate much "good" analysis. Perhaps you can substantiate your claim with more than your word? Especially since we know your a prone to stretching the truth.

we discussed this when the policy was released. Turnball got a lot of very positive press for the policy. You don't have to like it or agree with it but you don't get to make the claim that experts believe it to be crap. An AMG Mercedes is better than my car. it doesn't therefore make my car crap. It does however make it affordable.

I don't know what your car is. I hope it isn't crap.

Once again, perhaps you can substantiate your claim with more than your word? I know I can. I'll go get all the good old opinions from those with a bit more knowledge then definitely you or I.

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Makka Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 803 Gender:	Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM. Reply #28 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:44pm ur right her nose IS growing
Back to top	IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

male

Re: Gillard growing and growing as PM.
Reply #29 - Apr 26^th, 2013 at 1:47pm

Longie:All it takes is a simple google search:
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=coalition+nbn+policy&aq=f&oq=coalition+nbn+po...

Obviously don't worry about the www.liberal.org.au links Wink

Wink

They aren't really "experts" or anyone to offer much credibility to.

Also, a very good read: http://theconversation.com/the-coalitions-nbn-policy-is-a-triumph-of-short-termi...

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Pages: 1 2 3

Send Topic

Print

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Top of this page

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.

Valid XHTML

Valid CSS

Powered by Perl

Source Forge