Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14
Send Topic Print
Most Muslims Want Sharia Law (Read 34897 times)
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #90 - May 11th, 2013 at 5:35pm
 
Quote:
Narrated Aisha:
The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Allright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, "Best wishes and Allah's Blessing and a good luck." Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah's Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Sahih Bukhari 5.234)

Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin:
The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) married me when I was seven or six. When we came to Medina, some women came. according to Bishr's version: Umm Ruman came to me when I was swinging. They took me, made me prepared and decorated me. I was then brought to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him), and he took up cohabitation with me when I was nine. (Sunan Abu Da'ud 41.4915, Sunan Abu Da'ud 41.4916, Sunan Abu Da'ud 41.4917)


No wonder muslims and their apologists want to rewrite history.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #91 - May 11th, 2013 at 5:42pm
 
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 5:29pm:
Are you suggesting that Muslims accidentally came to believe that their prophet married a six year old girl, when she was in fact the ripe old age of ten?


The author of the hadith attributed the age claim from Ayeesha herself. That report has subsequently come into question.

from the same link as my previous post:
Quote:
As to the authenticity of these reports, it may be noted that the compilers of the books of Hadith did not apply the same stringent tests when accepting reports relating to historical matters as they did before accepting reports relating to the practical teachings and laws of Islam. The reason is that the former type of report was regarded as merely of academic interest while the latter type of report had a direct bearing on the practical duties of a Muslim and on what was allowed to them and what was prohibited. Thus the occurrence of reports such as the above about the marriage of Aisha in books of Hadith, even in Bukhari, is not necessarily a proof of their credibility.


Does this actually change anything in relation to the question of the pedophilia claim? No. Why don't you want to address that FD? I'm happy for you to assume that she was 9.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42555
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #92 - May 11th, 2013 at 5:42pm
 
moses wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 4:06pm:
Quote:
Condemn them now?  Certainly.

&

balance


Well I'd say that is exactly what is happening around the globe today.

islam  / muslims are being decried by civilised people everywhere, because of the innumerable acts of savagery carried out by muslims, in the name of allah / islam.

These barbaric muslims can and do justify their atrocities with islamic theology.

If some muslims want to claim no affiliation with the degenerates, why don't they tackle the issue of violence, hatred and bigotry in the commands from allah, the teachings of muhammad and the verses in the qur'an?


Now with regards to *balance* should the criticism be in proportion to the number of attacks carried out by the various extremists?

Or is that too balanced, as the muslim unfavourable judgment would be about a thousand times more than anyone else?   


You really don't understand what "guilt by association" means, do you, FD?   Roll Eyes

So, a newborn Muslim baby is guilty of all the, "innumerable acts of savagery carried out by muslims, in the name of allah / islam."?

So, a Muslim living thousands of kilometres away from where these "innumerable acts of savagery carried out by muslims, in the name of allah / islam." is guilty of them?

So, a Muslim who has never broken any laws, never carried out any "acts of savagery," carried out by other Muslims, "in the name of Allah / Islam" is guilty of them?

FD, you are a bigot.  You do believe in guilt by association.

You don't judge people by what they have done, themselves but merely because they share a religion's name with people who do bad things.

Do you do the same with Christians/Hindus/Jews/etc?  Nope, can't find any posts along those lines under your name.

You have no idea about balance and fairness.  You are acting it seems out of prejudice, hatred and bigotry.   Roll Eyes

Tell, would you believe it fair if someone started blaming all Australians for the acts of this man?

...

Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #93 - May 11th, 2013 at 5:57pm
 
moses wrote: Quote:
Well I'd say that is exactly what is happening around the globe today.

islam  / muslims are being decried by civilised people everywhere, because of the innumerable acts of savagery carried out by muslims, in the name of allah / islam.

These barbaric muslims can and do justify their atrocities with islamic theology.

If some muslims want to claim no affiliation with the degenerates, why don't they tackle the issue of violence, hatred and bigotry in the commands from allah, the teachings of muhammad and the verses in the qur'an?


Now with regards to *balance* should the criticism be in proportion to the number of attacks carried out by the various extremists?

Or is that too balanced, as the muslim unfavourable judgment would be about a thousand times more than anyone else?



Brian Ross wrote: Quote:
You really don't understand what "guilt by association" means, do you, FD?   

So, a newborn Muslim baby is guilty of all the, "innumerable acts of savagery carried out by muslims, in the name of allah / islam."?

So, a Muslim living thousands of kilometres away from where these "innumerable acts of savagery carried out by muslims, in the name of allah / islam." is guilty of them?

So, a Muslim who has never broken any laws, never carried out any "acts of savagery," carried out by other Muslims, "in the name of Allah / Islam" is guilty of them?

FD, you are a bigot.  You do believe in guilt by association.

You don't judge people by what they have done, themselves but merely because they share a religion's name with people who do bad things.

Do you do the same with Christians/Hindus/Jews/etc?  Nope, can't find any posts along those lines under your name.

You have no idea about balance and fairness.  You are acting it seems out of prejudice, hatred and bigotry.   

Tell, would you believe it fair if someone started blaming all Australians for the acts of this man?


You ran away from the issues:

1/.If some muslims want to claim no affiliation with the degenerates, why don't they tackle the issue of violence, hatred and bigotry in the commands from allah, the teachings of muhammad and the verses in the qur'an?

2/.Now with regards to *balance* should the criticism be in proportion to the number of attacks carried out by the various extremists?

Or is that too balanced, as the muslim unfavourable judgment would be about a thousand times more than anyone else?

   
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #94 - May 11th, 2013 at 6:08pm
 
Hi Moses.

I must be missing something. Can you please explain to me how the Al-Bukhari hadith is any sort of proof of the prophet's pedophilia?

(hint: keep in mind what pedophilia actually means).
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21916
A cat with a view
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #95 - May 11th, 2013 at 6:45pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 10th, 2013 at 11:39pm:
Sprintcyclist wrote on May 10th, 2013 at 11:33pm:
Quote:
........."We don't accept the system of infidels which is called democracy," Mr Mehsud wrote in the letter dated May 1.

"I am sending a list of attacks and the modus operandi, along with a separate list of fedayeen (suicide bombers) . . . you take care of attacks in Punjab and Singh. I will take care of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Baluchistan."
.


http://www.theage.com.au/world/pakistan-votes-under-talibans-bloody-threat-20130...

a muslims mindset.  "we will do anything to have our way."
"the more extreme we are, the more muslim we are."



This raises several questions.

Why do the Taliban have to send suicide bombers to other regions of the country to blow up fellow Muslims?






Brian_Ross,

The Taliban ARE NOT sending suicide bombers to other regions of the country to blow up fellow moslems.

As you well know,
Allah's law declares that moslems, must never knowingly kill another moslem.

"......If a man kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell, to abide therein (For ever): And the wrath and the curse of Allah are upon him, and a dreadful penalty is prepared for him."
Koran 4.92, 93

Therefore, it follows [using moslem logic] that the Taliban ARE NOT sending suicide bombers to other regions of the country to blow up fellow moslems.

Got it now ????





The Taliban ARE sending suicide bombers to other regions of the country to murder the kuffar.

That the kuffar in Pakistan call themselves, and think that that they are, moslems, is irrelevant to the Taliban.i
Quote:

Surely their fellow Muslims, if they were all true followers of Islam, as defined by you and other of it's critics here, would all hold the same opinion and automatically reject the democratic process.

Why would a Muslim nation like Pakistan even be a democracy (in theory, if not thus far in practice) in the first place if Islam rejected the concepts of democracy so completely, as you and the Taliban claim?

So many contradictions...
   Roll Eyes





So many uninformed idiots called 'Brian', on Australian internet forums.


Cheesy               Cheesy               Cheesy             

Duh!!!!!!!!!!


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21916
A cat with a view
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #96 - May 11th, 2013 at 6:53pm
 
Emma wrote on May 10th, 2013 at 10:50pm:
what are you???

not men...

you are the male child that beats and rapes its own mother.   The brother or Uncle who kills the young woman ..because you didn't approve of her.
You are the male child that stones women to death for infidelity... because they were raped,  by one of YOU.

YOU ARE THE MALE CHILD that needs women (mothers) ... until you are old enough to spit on her.
You are the never to-be-adult male who always needs to be led, your fear of ?? requires inate cruelty, because you lack the capacity for genuine human relations.

The male who demands respect, and gives none.
No MAtter HOW PIOUS YOU BELIEVE YOURSELVES...

you are swine.




Have to say Emma/jalane,.......

I wouldn't want to meet you, in a dark ally.               Shocked




Emma,

You are not related to Aileen Wuornos are you ?             Shocked

A cousin, perhaps ???
Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42555
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #97 - May 11th, 2013 at 7:26pm
 
moses wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 5:57pm:
You ran away from the issues:

1/.If some muslims want to claim no affiliation with the degenerates, why don't they tackle the issue of violence, hatred and bigotry in the commands from allah, the teachings of muhammad and the verses in the qur'an?


I would ask the same of Christians.  Their holy book includes an entire "testament" where hatred, racism, violence, intolerance and so on are writ large for all to see.  Why haven't they removed The Old Testament from their Bible, Moses?

You ask of others, what you and your own co-religionists are unwilling to do.   Again I pointed out that you have forgotten Matthew 7:5 and John 8:7.   Obviously you are a bad Christian, Moses!   Roll Eyes

Despite that, let us continue with your question.  How do you know they aren't tackling the violence within their midst?  The MSM and the Internet which you rely so much upon for your information don't publicise the efforts being made by many Muslims to eject the radical Islamists from their midst, yet we see them finding it harder and harder to preach in Mosques in the West.  In Muslim countries, the Takfiri Islamists attack and kill the moderates.   In some of those countries moderate regimes are being helped by the West, yet again you don't give them credit for their efforts against the radicals.   Indeed, you fail dismally to even consider that there are moderates within Islamd, instead you continually attack all Muslims, Moses.   Roll Eyes

Quote:
2/.Now with regards to *balance* should the criticism be in proportion to the number of attacks carried out by the various extremists?


Your criticisms should be directed against the extremists.  You make no differentiation.  To you, all Muslims are guilty of any crime committed by any Muslim, no matter how removed from it.  That is blatant bigotry, Moses, as I keep pointing out.   If Christians were persecuted the same way you treat Muslims, as some Muslims actually do, you'd be bleating about it without a doubt.   Again, read Matthew 7:5 and John 8:7 and consider your comments against Muslims in their light, Moses.

Quote:
Or is that too balanced, as the muslim unfavourable judgment would be about a thousand times more than anyone else?


Bad Muslims deserve every ounce of your vitriole, Moses.

Problem is, you make no differentiation between bad Muslims and good Muslims.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42555
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #98 - May 11th, 2013 at 7:28pm
 
Yadda wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 6:45pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 10th, 2013 at 11:39pm:
Sprintcyclist wrote on May 10th, 2013 at 11:33pm:
Quote:
........."We don't accept the system of infidels which is called democracy," Mr Mehsud wrote in the letter dated May 1.

"I am sending a list of attacks and the modus operandi, along with a separate list of fedayeen (suicide bombers) . . . you take care of attacks in Punjab and Singh. I will take care of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Baluchistan."
.


http://www.theage.com.au/world/pakistan-votes-under-talibans-bloody-threat-20130...

a muslims mindset.  "we will do anything to have our way."
"the more extreme we are, the more muslim we are."



This raises several questions.

Why do the Taliban have to send suicide bombers to other regions of the country to blow up fellow Muslims?






Brian_Ross,

The Taliban ARE NOT sending suicide bombers to other regions of the country to blow up fellow moslems.

As you well know,
Allah's law declares that moslems, must never knowingly kill another moslem.

"......If a man kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell, to abide therein (For ever): And the wrath and the curse of Allah are upon him, and a dreadful penalty is prepared for him."
Koran 4.92, 93

Therefore, it follows [using moslem logic] that the Taliban ARE NOT sending suicide bombers to other regions of the country to blow up fellow moslems.

Got it now ????





The Taliban ARE sending suicide bombers to other regions of the country to murder the kuffar.

That the kuffar in Pakistan call themselves, and think that that they are, moslems, is irrelevant to the Taliban.i
Quote:

Surely their fellow Muslims, if they were all true followers of Islam, as defined by you and other of it's critics here, would all hold the same opinion and automatically reject the democratic process.

Why would a Muslim nation like Pakistan even be a democracy (in theory, if not thus far in practice) in the first place if Islam rejected the concepts of democracy so completely, as you and the Taliban claim?

So many contradictions...
   Roll Eyes





So many uninformed idiots called 'Brian', on Australian internet forums.


Cheesy               Cheesy               Cheesy             

Duh!!!!!!!!!!




"Uninformed" or merely unwilling to accept your bigoted viewpoint, Yadda?   

Who made you Pope?  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21916
A cat with a view
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #99 - May 11th, 2013 at 7:32pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 1:48pm:
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 1:21pm:
I guess that answers that question.


FD Im very happy to go with the commonly accepted definition of pedophilia when arguing whether or not Mohammad was one. It seems you are not:

Quote:
As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in persons 16 years of age or older typically characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual interest toward prepubescent children

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

Is that an acceptable definition?

If so, please demonstrate to me that prophet Mohammad had " a primary or exclusive sexual interest toward prepubescent children"





Why is that an acceptable definition ?

Many convicted paedophiles have also been married men.





polite_gandalf wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 2:36pm:
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 2:22pm:
Why do you say "alleged" to describe his sex slaves?


Because he had no sex slaves.

Now after you've proven to me that the prophet was a pedophile, then perhaps you can move on to proving that he has sex slaves. You've got a bit of work to do FD.



According to ISLAMIC texts, Mohammed was married to Aisha when she was six years old.

Their marriage was consummated when Aisha was 9 years old.

But of course, Mohammed had the agreement of Aisha's father, so it must have been OK.

Seeking to marry a six year old girl, had nothing to do with a sexual interest, by Mohammed, in a prepubescent little girl.           Tongue




Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #100 - May 11th, 2013 at 8:02pm
 
Yadda wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 7:32pm:
Seeking to marry a six year old girl, had nothing to do with a sexual interest, by Mohammed, in a prepubescent little girl.


Yet he waited a whole three years before anything physical happened.

Mohammad purportedly had 12 wives after his 25 year marriage with Khadija - only one of them was pre-pubescent at the time of betrothal. Then he waited a whole three years before he consumated that marriage. And the father of that wife *JUST HAPPENED* to be the man he wanted to take over the leadership of the islamic nation?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21916
A cat with a view
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #101 - May 11th, 2013 at 8:06pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 7:26pm:
moses wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 5:57pm:
You ran away from the issues:

1/.If some muslims want to claim no affiliation with the degenerates, why don't they tackle the issue of violence, hatred and bigotry in the commands from allah, the teachings of muhammad and the verses in the qur'an?


I would ask the same of Christians.  Their holy book includes an entire "testament" where hatred, racism, violence, intolerance and so on are writ large for all to see.  Why haven't they removed The Old Testament from their Bible, Moses?

You ask of others, what you and your own co-religionists are unwilling to do.   Again I pointed out that you have forgotten Matthew 7:5 and John 8:7.   Obviously you are a bad Christian, Moses!   Roll Eyes

Despite that, let us continue with your question.  How do you know they aren't tackling the violence within their midst?  The MSM and the Internet which you rely so much upon for your information don't publicise the efforts being made by many Muslims to eject the radical Islamists from their midst, yet we see them finding it harder and harder to preach in Mosques in the West.  In Muslim countries, the Takfiri Islamists attack and kill the moderates.   In some of those countries moderate regimes are being helped by the West, yet again you don't give them credit for their efforts against the radicals.   Indeed, you fail dismally to even consider that there are moderates within Islamd, instead you continually attack all Muslims, Moses.   Roll Eyes

Quote:
2/.Now with regards to *balance* should the criticism be in proportion to the number of attacks carried out by the various extremists?


Your criticisms should be directed against the extremists.  You make no differentiation.  To you, all Muslims are guilty of any crime committed by any Muslim, no matter how removed from it.  That is blatant bigotry, Moses, as I keep pointing out.   If Christians were persecuted the same way you treat Muslims, as some Muslims actually do, you'd be bleating about it without a doubt.   Again, read Matthew 7:5 and John 8:7 and consider your comments against Muslims in their light, Moses.

Quote:
Or is that too balanced, as the muslim unfavourable judgment would be about a thousand times more than anyone else?


Bad Muslims deserve every ounce of your vitriole, Moses.

Problem is, you make no differentiation between bad Muslims and good Muslims.    Roll Eyes





'Good' moslems, 'bad' moslems.

It all a load of shyte, Brian_Ross

These definitions, of 'good moslems' or 'bad moslems', is just a 'smoke screen', used by moslems, to confuse the infidels.



Quote:

.....in those places where moslems do not have authority, sowing and nurturing confusion, and avoiding being pinned down to making direct definitions, and prolonging delays in 'coming to knowledge'......seem to be the main order of business.




Dictionary;
obfuscate = =
1 make unclear or unintelligible.
2 bewilder.







Quote:
"Don’t call me radical. Don’t call me moderate. Call me Muslim."
.....We do not have “radical” and “moderate” in Islam. Muslims are Muslims.
.....Unfortunately those who follow the Quran and practise their religion are called radical Muslims or extremist or Islamist or fundamentalist. And those who only carry the name of Muslim and Islam without following the orders of Allah in the Holy Quran are called moderate Muslims or understanding Muslims or open minded Muslims!

google






Quote:
Cleric preaches that violence is part of Islam
By Duncan Gardham

01/05/2007
In documents seen by The Daily Telegraph, al-Muhajiroun claimed: "Terrorism is a part of Islam" and "Allah made it obligatory to prepare and to terrify the enemy of Allah".
The article advised: "The kuffar of USA and UK are without doubt our enemy.There is no such thing as an innocent kafir, innocence is only applicable for the Muslims. Not only is it obligatory to fight them, it is haram [forbidden] to feel sorry for them."

google








FACT;
Moslems choose to belong to, and to associate themselves with, ISLAM.


All moslems choose to associate themselves with the evil which ISLAM is.

All moslems, who say "I am a moslem.", are choosing to associate themselves with the religious violence which ISLAM promotes in the world - a religious violence which ISLAM calls, 'religious devotion'.

LOOK HERE ----->
THE RELIGION OF PEACE

http://thereligionofpeace.com/

[/quote]






WHAT MOSLEMS WANT NAIVE NON-MOSLEMS TO ACCEPT IS THIS;


That even if a moslem chooses to associate himself with what ISLAM is;

And even if ISLAM is an evil philosophy, moslems claim that they cannot be held responsible, for their association with the evil and violent behaviour which ISLAM encourages, condones, justifies, and legitimises.


The fault lays somewhere else.

But not with those who declare themselves to be moslems.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42555
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #102 - May 11th, 2013 at 8:35pm
 
Yadda wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 8:06pm:
'Good' moslems, 'bad' moslems.

It all a load of shyte, Brian_Ross

These definitions, of 'good moslems' or 'bad moslems', is just a 'smoke screen', used by moslems, to confuse the infidels.


Thank you, Yadda for removing any doubt about you being a bigot.   Roll Eyes



Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21916
A cat with a view
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #103 - May 11th, 2013 at 8:45pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 8:35pm:
Yadda wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 8:06pm:
'Good' moslems, 'bad' moslems.

It all a load of shyte, Brian_Ross

These definitions, of 'good moslems' or 'bad moslems', is just a 'smoke screen', used by moslems, to confuse the infidels.


Thank you, Yadda for removing any doubt about you being a bigot.
   Roll Eyes






You are an ignorant eeeeediot, Brian, imo.




Being a bigot means that a person [i.e. the bigot!] objects to others with differing opinion(s), expressing their opinion(s).

It does not mean that i am a bigot, BECAUSE i express an opinion, Brian.






Dictionary;
bigot = = a person who is prejudiced in their views and intolerant of the opinions of others.


Bigots, are those people who are,
".....intolerant of the opinions of others."



Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21916
A cat with a view
Re: Most Muslims Want Sharia Law
Reply #104 - May 11th, 2013 at 9:01pm
 
Yadda wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 8:45pm:

Being a bigot means that a person [i.e. the bigot!] objects to others with differing opinion(s), expressing their opinion(s).

It does not mean that i am a bigot, BECAUSE i express an opinion, Brian.






Dictionary;
bigot = = a person who is prejudiced in their views and intolerant of the opinions of others.


Bigots, are those people who are,
".....intolerant of the opinions of others."








AGAIN....
Dictionary;
bigot = = a person who is prejudiced in their views and intolerant of the opinions of others.


Bigots, are those people who are,
".....intolerant of the opinions of others."





Brian,

Do you want to see bigotry ?

Then scrutinise a devout moslem.

Devout moslems insist that no-one must be permitted to scrutinise, satirise, or criticise Mohammed/ISLAM.

THAT, is bigotry.

And here [below] are a whole crowd of BIGOTS, proudly displaying their bigotry!


p.s.
Where is your criticism of this moslem bigotry, Brian ?




IMAGE...
...
London, moslem street protests.
Moslems demanding their right to exercise their 'freedom of religion', to kill people who 'insult' their religion,
.....BECAUSE THEY DO NOT BELIEVE WHAT MOSLEMS BELIEVE.



THOSE PLACARDS, AT A MOSLEM STREET PROTEST IN LONDON READ.....

"Slay those who insult Islam"
"Behead those who insult Islam"
"Massacre those who insult Islam"
"Butcher those who mock Islam"

"Europe you will pay, demolition is on its way"
"Europe you will pay, extermination is on its way"
"Exterminate those who slander Islam"
"Europe is the cancer, Islam is the answer"
"Islam will dominate the world"
"Freedom go to hell"
"Europe take some lessons from 9/11"
"Be prepared for the real Holocaust"
"BBC = British Blasphemic Crusaders"



Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14
Send Topic Print