Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11
Send Topic Print
US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2 (Read 18938 times)
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #105 - May 5th, 2013 at 2:53pm
 
Chard, the fact genuine, decent legislation amendments to gun control in ths country is shot down by Republicans in the pocket of the NRA is not something to be proud.

Gun laws here are absolutely retarded.
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
Chard
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mein Führer! I can walk!

Posts: 1077
Alabama, USA
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #106 - May 5th, 2013 at 3:05pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 2:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 2:15pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 2:10pm:
Chard wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 1:00pm:
No, they created a product in response to a consumer demand.

You can't seriously run with that answer?!



It certainly was his most ludicrous answer thus far.

He'll start to back peddle now: watch out for terms like "legal" and "illicit".

Wink





Bingo!

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1367487307/101#101

Roll Eyes


Beats the hell out of making knee-jerk generalizations . Considering that so fwr your entire argument is "itvs immoral because, um...because I say so" I find it hilarious you gripe about me using a definable standard that's actually relevant to OP article.

But hey, why actually make a coherent factual argument when you can pat youself on the back instead.
Back to top
 

Deterrence is the art of producing in the mind of the enemy... the FEAR to attack.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 137820
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #107 - May 5th, 2013 at 3:06pm
 
Life_goes_on wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 2:46pm:
You could probably go and brew up a batch yourself (it's easy)



I've got a few hours to kill this afternoon.

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 137820
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #108 - May 5th, 2013 at 3:08pm
 
Chard wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:05pm:
Beats the hell out of making knee-jerk generalizations



That was your plan 'B', was it?

Hmmm, it might be time for you to consider a third option.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Chard
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mein Führer! I can walk!

Posts: 1077
Alabama, USA
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #109 - May 5th, 2013 at 3:14pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 2:53pm:
Chard, the fact genuine, decent legislation amendments to gun control in ths country is shot down by Republicans in the pocket of the NRA is not something to be proud.


By all means, show me where I've ever disagreed with that. I thought I made it clear in the last gun thread that I'm in favor of gun control.

Quote:
Gun laws here are absolutely retarded.


That's mostly because traditionally we've allowed the states to decide on how they want to handle gun laws. It's actually pretty rare to see the fedal government create and implement gun laws that force all the states to use the same statutes. Last one I can recall that's still in effect is the background check s and waiting period for first time pistol purchases.
Back to top
 

Deterrence is the art of producing in the mind of the enemy... the FEAR to attack.
 
IP Logged
 
Chard
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mein Führer! I can walk!

Posts: 1077
Alabama, USA
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #110 - May 5th, 2013 at 3:19pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:08pm:
Chard wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:05pm:
Beats the hell out of making knee-jerk generalizations



That was your plan 'B', was it?

Hmmm, it might be time for you to consider a third option.


Greg, all you have is opinion and whatever convoluted morales you subscribe to for an argument. You could try and prove me wrong, but that would require you to  A) know what the hell your claims talking about, and B) not be a dishonest asshole.
Back to top
 

Deterrence is the art of producing in the mind of the enemy... the FEAR to attack.
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #111 - May 5th, 2013 at 3:24pm
 
Well I haven't read the last thread but if you're suggesting the law is not to blame when we allow companies to make firearms for children.....

It's a reasonable assumption you're a tad loose on the gun control.

I think people who think citizens should have ak-47s and grenade launchers would agree with the law for kids.
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 137820
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #112 - May 5th, 2013 at 3:28pm
 
Chard wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:19pm:
You could try and prove me wrong ...



Already ticked that box.

You claimed that "The responsibility for this begins and ends with the kids parents. "

However, you were quickly shown that the responsibility for this begins with the manufacturer, and ends with the parents.

The rest has just been icing on the cake.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #113 - May 5th, 2013 at 3:43pm
 
every child should own a pair of boxing gloves and be taught how to use them.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Chard
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mein Führer! I can walk!

Posts: 1077
Alabama, USA
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #114 - May 5th, 2013 at 4:05pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:28pm:
Chard wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:19pm:
You could try and prove me wrong ...



Already ticked that box.

You claimed that "The responsibility for this begins and ends with the kids parents. "

However, you were quickly shown that the responsibility for this begins with the manufacturer, and ends with the parents.


The only thing you've shown is the ability to repeat yourself. That you faoled to actually address any of my arguments proves that.


Quote:
he rest has just been icing on the cake.



The last thing your fatass needs is more cake.
Back to top
 

Deterrence is the art of producing in the mind of the enemy... the FEAR to attack.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 137820
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #115 - May 5th, 2013 at 4:07pm
 
Chard wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 4:05pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:28pm:
Chard wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:19pm:
You could try and prove me wrong ...



Already ticked that box.

You claimed that "The responsibility for this begins and ends with the kids parents. "

However, you were quickly shown that the responsibility for this begins with the manufacturer, and ends with the parents.


The only thing you've shown is the ability to repeat yourself. That you faoled to actually address any of my arguments proves that.


Quote:
he rest has just been icing on the cake.



The last thing your fatass needs is more cake.



I do love a sore loser.

Better luck next time old boy.

Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10266
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #116 - May 5th, 2013 at 5:51pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:28pm:
Chard wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:19pm:
You could try and prove me wrong ...



Already ticked that box.

You claimed that "The responsibility for this begins and ends with the kids parents. "

However, you were quickly shown that the responsibility for this begins with the manufacturer, and ends with the parents.

The rest has just been icing on the cake.



Logic fallacies, Peccy. You're engaging in circular reasoning and begging the question. Stating the conclusion in your premise is not an argument!

How's that law degree going for ya?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 137820
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #117 - May 5th, 2013 at 11:44pm
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 5:51pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:28pm:
Chard wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:19pm:
You could try and prove me wrong ...



Already ticked that box.

You claimed that "The responsibility for this begins and ends with the kids parents. "

However, you were quickly shown that the responsibility for this begins with the manufacturer, and ends with the parents.

The rest has just been icing on the cake.



Logic fallacies, Peccy. You're engaging in circular reasoning and begging the question. Stating the conclusion in your premise is not an argument!

How's that law degree going for ya?



Chard has been shown up (again) as a fool.

His "argument" has been destroyed.

Life is good.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Chard
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mein Führer! I can walk!

Posts: 1077
Alabama, USA
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #118 - May 6th, 2013 at 4:32am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 11:44pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 5:51pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:28pm:
Chard wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 3:19pm:
You could try and prove me wrong ...



Already ticked that box.

You claimed that "The responsibility for this begins and ends with the kids parents. "

However, you were quickly shown that the responsibility for this begins with the manufacturer, and ends with the parents.

The rest has just been icing on the cake.



Logic fallacies, Peccy. You're engaging in circular reasoning and begging the question. Stating the conclusion in your premise is not an argument!

How's that law degree going for ya?



Chard has been shown up (again) as a fool.

His "argument" has been destroyed.

Life is good.


Slapping yourself on the back and actually doing are two different things. How about you try actuaply responding to my arguments instead of repeating the same thing over and over like a broken record. Here, I'll even be a nice guy and respost it for you.

Quote:
Chard wrote on May 5th, 2013 at 1:00pm:
No, they created a product in response to a consumer demand.



A decision that is morally reprehensible.


In your opinion it's "immoral". In legal fact it's completely kosher under US law.


Quote:
Just because a consumer demand exists, it doesn't mean supplying that demand is the right thing to do.


Again, that's your opinion and if the product was illegal or unsafe to operate then you'd have a point. Problem is the product Cricket produced is A) completely legal in the US, and B) is perfectly safe to operate if you follow the manufacturer's instruction. Sparks not only failed to heed those instructions, she did so in a way that she could he held criminally liable for.


Quote:
Responsibility for this tragedy starts with the gun manufacturer, and ends with the parents.


And what measure are you using to make that conclusion? It sure as hell doesn't have any legal basis on cricket's part.


Quote:
The stupid parents have to suffer with this for the rest of their lives.


So will their son, who gets to spend the rest of his pife knowing he killed his sister because his mother is an irresponsible twat.


Quote:
Hopefully Cricket will go broke: they need to pay for their greed-driven irresponsibility.


Doubtful. If anything people will buy more of their products. It happens evety time when a shooting happens that gets some fool in congress to indruce a gun control bill. For example, after Congresswoman Gabreil Giffords was shot there was a call for banning high capacity magazines. Know what happened? Sales for high capacity pistol magazines jumped by just shy of 300%.


Put up or shut up time, fatty.
Back to top
 

Deterrence is the art of producing in the mind of the enemy... the FEAR to attack.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 137820
Gender: male
Re: US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
Reply #119 - May 6th, 2013 at 7:38am
 
Chard wrote on May 6th, 2013 at 4:32am:
How about you try actuaply responding to my arguments ...



Already ticked that box.

You claimed that "The responsibility for this begins and ends with the kids parents. "

However, you were quickly shown that the responsibility for this begins with the manufacturer, and ends with the parents.

Better luck next time.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11
Send Topic Print