Karnal wrote on Jun 9^th, 2013 at 12:45pm:



An English friend recounts traveling in Jordan [backpacking] during his youth [1970's].

A local recognised him [in the street] as a Brit, and kindly invited him to come stay overnight in his home.

The local provided his guest with a meal, then later that evening explained that his wife was 'indisposed' due to her period, and asked would the Brit care to let his host roger him ?

One of the remnants of the local Sodomite tribe no doubt ?         

[p.s. my friend declined]

polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 7^th, 2013 at 10:53am:



Calling him a douchbag (are you an American mobster/college student now??) is just lame-o arse covering.

If you have an argument against what Pat Condell says, state it, addressing the points he makes.

But you cannot do this.

Your dismissing of what he says just confirms that he is right at least insofar as showing you up as having no way of countering him and so in the end you have absolutely no argument to mount other than 'douchebagging'.

Soren wrote on Jun 12^th, 2013 at 9:39pm:


Thats rich.

Here's my open mind Soren: I acknowledge that violence and intolerance is justified as doctrinal by some muslims. I also acknowledge that peace and tolerance is justified as doctrinal by other muslims.

And here's your open mind: you acknowledge that violence and intolerance is justified as doctrinal by some muslims. You have singularly failed, despite many many opportunities, to acknowledge that peace and tolerance is justified as doctrinal by a great many muslims - the majority in fact.

Notice the difference?

But as if that was the worst of it. Most of your arguments consist of making up outrageous lies about muslims to push your agenda - from your claim about a knife wielding would-be muslim honour killer in Sweden (he was non-muslim), to your fantasies about muslims never blaming other muslims for harming non-muslims, to your laughable assertion about all translators in the islamic golden age being non-muslims. Honestly, how much more of a joke can you make yourself Soren?

And you dare sit there and lecture me about being open minded.

What a smacking joke. 

Heres my scrutiny:

Islamic doctrine is interpreted by a majority of muslims as promoting peace and tolerance. This interpretation is advocated, promoted and advertised far more strongly than the minority who advocate the opposite interpretation. Like I said before, the only possible way you wouldn't be able to acknowledge this, is if you hold your hands over your ears and scream "lalalalala" - on the many many occassions that moderate muslim leaders stand up and push their case.

I'm short of cash, so I'm taking bets that THIS family will not be losing their home.

There's NO WAY the socialists who run Britain and the Human Rights Commission in Europe will allow these people to be evicted.

Not a chance.

Needless to say ~ the whole damn lot of them should be deported to where their mentality is better suited to the cultural environment ~ the Middle East.

I'm embarrassed by what bloody fools the Brits have been making of themselves these past few decades.

Soren wrote on Jun 13^th, 2013 at 10:21pm:


Agreed. How can houses be that cheap in major UK cities?

Shurely shome mishtake.

These people will be a lot more expensive in social housing than the house they formerly owned.

Still, I’m sure the boys at the Longsight Police Station will get nice new lockers out of it - maybe a few bullet-proof vests that work. The ladies can live in their voluminous tents.

Money for jam, eh?

Soren wrote on Jun 15^th, 2013 at 9:07pm:


Sorry, old chap, "arseepin"? From the Danish?

Thank you, old boy, thank you very.much indeed, but I really must ask you to try to speak more English. It will help you to learn the language faster. In our language, that could sound like something else entirely!

Now. Try with me. "I was born on a pirate ship."

Come on, old boy, don’t be shy. Hold your tongue and say it, there’s a good chap. We’ll "arseepin" together, shall we?

Jolly good.

polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 12^th, 2013 at 11:13pm:



They are lying low and are desperate not to catch the eye of the the more convinced Muslims who are going about  intimidating them and all the non-Muslims around by targeting anyone who raises a critical peep against Islam.

Not exactly 'promoting peace and tolerance' in my view. It's more like cowardly arse-covering.

Every time the West hits back against the Islamists you are immediately rallying with excuses and explanations and yes-buts.
You are the cowardly jihadists  -  jihadist, only cowardly and two-faced.

You are using freedom and liberal democracy as a cover to ferment completely anti-liberal and anti-democratic ideals -ie Islam. i