polite_gandalf wrote on May 4
th, 2013 at 12:06pm:
1/.....mainstream islamic scholars, teachers and leaders directly refute the doctrinal basis of islamic extremism
2/ and in fact make a doctrinal case for the opposite view - ie that islamic texts actually promote peace and tolerance.......
......where is the evidence that violence and extremism is institutionalised and manufactured within mainstream islam? Where?
Read on......
gandalf,
What blatant lies you speak!
Your words are
patently false, and intended to deceive the ignorant and the naive.
Why pretend, gandalf ?
Why do you engage in such falsehood, in this forum, gandalf ?You are a moslem.
You clearly know the truth [about ISLAM's intents].
But like all moslems, you absolutely refuse to acknowledge those wicked intents."......where is the evidence that violence and extremism is institutionalised and manufactured within mainstream islam?
"
EXAMPLE #1,"
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission,
and feel themselves subdued. "
Koran 9.29
"......where is the evidence that violence and extremism is institutionalised and manufactured within mainstream islam?
EXAMPLE #2, Quote:
Creed of the sword
September 23, 2006
...On the other hand, no less a figure than the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh Abdel Aziz al-Sheikh, issued a statement on the official Saudi news service, defending Muslims' divine right to resort to violence: "The spread of Islam has gone through several phases, secret and then public, in Mecca and Medina. God then authorised the faithful to defend themselves and to fight against those fighting them, which amounts to a right legitimised by God. This ... is quite reasonable, and God will not hate it."
...Saudi Arabia's most senior cleric also explained that war was never Islam's ancient founder, the prophet Mohammed's, first choice: "He gave three options: either accept Islam, or surrender and pay tax, and they will be allowed to remain in their land, observing their religion under the protection of Muslims." Thus, according to the Grand Mufti, THE THIRD OPTION OF VIOLENCE AGAINST NON-MUSLIMS WAS ONLY A LAST RESORT, IF THEY REFUSED TO CONVERT OR SURRENDER PEACEFULLY TO THE ARMIES OF ISLAM.
...The resulting doctrine of war was described by the great medieval philosopher Ibn Khaldun: "In the Muslim community, the holy war (jihad) is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the (Muslim) mission and the (obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force." (The Muqaddimah)
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/creed-of-the-sword/story-e6frg6n6-111111225..."...violence against non-Muslims was only a last resort, if they refused to convert or surrender peacefully to the armies of Islam."
It is so comforting, to know that
"...islamic texts actually promote peace and tolerance"
, and that moslems are really so 'peacefully' inclined.
/sarc off
gandalf,
What lying fingers you have, for typing such a blatant falsehood.
+++
According to ISLAM [and as being commonly confirmed by devout moslems, in conversation among themselves] we 'unbelievers' have 3 options.
Two of those options would secure us and
instant 'peace' with ISLAM and moslems.
The three options are;
1/ Surrender - and convert to ISLAM.
2/ Surrender - and
live as slaves under moslem political rule [surrendering all of our current rights and freedoms].
3/ Suffer a [never ending] war of attrition, conducted against us, by moslems.
+++
Quote:"kuffar" = = "...is an Arabic word meaning.....[an unbeliever] a person....who hides, denies, or covers the truth."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuffargandalf,
You refer to yourself as a believer, in God.
But you and yours, will always be the "kuffar".
You and yours,
in 'hiding, denying, and covering the truth', are a disgrace among mankind.
ISLAM, ....is a false religion, for a false people.