What if the 'expanding universe' is a fatally flawed theory ?This YT presentation is an expose' of the failings [i.e. corruption] of man's elite institutions and organisation(s), in the fields of science and education.
Universe - Episode 1 - The Cosmology Quest - The Electric Universe and Plasma Physics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmotCQCxQEIUniverse - Episode 2 - The Cosmology Quest - The Electric Universe and Plasma Physics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-2uvQ_MJz8data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64aa5/64aa5daef1e90768b9217b5d2054e5e8cb4075ac" alt="... ..."
'Cosmology' - is the term used by secular mankind to refer to the ['non-religious'] theories which explain the colloquial, 'life, the universe, and everything' - the HHGTTG '42' paradigm.
The problem is that [because of the practical and real limits of man's comprehension of his circumstances] cosmology is as much an art, as a science.
i.e.
Cosmology as a known 'fact', relies as much upon supposition and theories, as much as it does upon observation.
But despite this, a good understanding of our 'circumstances' gained through basic observation, and then reasoned conclusion, should still be achievable by mankind, i believe.
Except that a further problem [which is a limiting factor to man's access to 'pure' knowledge] is that man is both a corrupted creature, and a corrupting creature, at his very core.
e.g.
In 'the real world', the system of the 'education' of man [in this instance, in the field of cosmology], can become corrupted when a specialised 'academia' [i.e. a collection of self-absorbed, and often self-interested, 'experts'] chooses at a point in time [for 'purely' self-interested reasons], to ignore and deny the implication(s) of new observed facts.
[In the field of education, could a specialised 'academia' be called a form of 'priesthood' ?]
This refusal by a specialised 'academia' to [even!] acknowledge [the] new observable facts [AND, the implication(s) upon our knowledge!], is almost always effected in an effort to protect the prestige of an individual or the prestige of an academic institution [which is promulgating a contrary, and widely accepted view or opinion].
In such circumstances, 'education' has become not a path to knowledge, but has become a convenient path to a bucket of money/power/prestige for a group of flawed individuals.
Motives intervene, to corrupt purpose.Through the corruption of its own processes of examining evidence and new facts, a specialised 'academia' ceases to be a body of men [and women] dedicated to seeking knowledge [for mankind] - but [like so many 'churches'] become simply a corrupt body of men [and women] serving their own interests.
And what can happen is that if new facts are observed, which challenge an established 'important' hypothesis, many 'academics' will simply pretend that the new facts do not exist.
MORE....