____ wrote on May 8^th, 2013 at 9:32pm:



Only an proud, vain, idiot imbecile, would try to cure cancer by removing cancer cells from the body.

And they would try to [do that], because they imagine that they are clever.


greens,

Never mind....labels, labels, labels ...

You ARE a wicked imbecile.

And i will tell you why you are an imbecile.

Because you always want to treat symptoms.

But you NEVER, EVER, want to avoid causes.

Quote:





And, you still, cannot see it.

That, is what is sad, about ppl like yourself - wilful blindness.





Dr.Lorraine Day Cancer Cure                              39 min
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DYhyCu3DQY

this is not a post....
.....it is a means to view what i have posted!!!!!

FD knows what i mean

"a judgemental god" !

why do some people give this god thingy insecure human traits?

____ wrote on May 8^th, 2013 at 10:57am:


Marriage and monogamy has absolutely nothing to do with "inbreeding". I am not sure what bizarre logic you used to reach that conclusion. The concept of pair-bonding is something that has advanced us as a species.

Breeding programs is something that has been flirted with at various times without any success. (Most famously by the Nazi's).

I have however heard the theory that modern medicine is actually weakening us as a species. People who in the past would have died young are now being kept alive long enough to breed and pass on their genes.

Quote:



It restricts the diversification of the human gene pool so dumbing down the species.


There are probably no monogamous mammals. All the mammals that are said to be monogamous are only socially monogamous, and not sexually monogamous. This is probably true for all birds as well. Birds formerly thought to be sexually monogamous (like swans) are now known to engage in what is euphemistically called "extra-pair copulation" all the time.

Monogamy is evolutionary death to a species. A species that practices sexual monogamy will quickly die out due to inadequate mixing of the gene pool.

We don't need to do anything.  Nature has thousands of ways to weed out the crap, and it acts without fear or favour to maximise the fitness of the species.  We've held it bay for a while with technology, but the dam wall is starting to crumble.

So much faith in Mother Nature. So little faith in science.

The Faculty's Ethics Committee has approved the transplant of human embryos in old boys' rectums.

It will be an interesting social experiment, no?

Grey wrote on May 9^th, 2013 at 12:58pm:

I've noticed over the last couple of days you've been seeking out my posts, but have dropped all pretences about argument, in favour of snark - a tactic usually employed by women, but also men controlled by their emotions.  Why do you think I elicit such a strong emotional response in you grey?  I certainly have my theory, but it'd amuse me to hear you rationalize it.