Australian Politics Forum - White women breaking with convention?

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40435	Re: White women breaking with convention? Reply #75 - May 14^th, 2013 at 11:11am Lord Herbert wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 7:56am: Not a chance. Brian is history. Dead in the water. An insect on the windscreen of Life. Better a life lived to the full than a life lived stuck to the fly-paper, Herbie.
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg Gold Member Offline WE ARE BORG Posts: 26486 Australia	Re: White women breaking with convention? Reply #76 - May 14^th, 2013 at 11:11am Lord Herbert wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 11:06am: I think you owe us an apology. Especially to the ladies here. Kat and Anthrax. 1) I dont think kat is female 2) Why should females be treated differently? Its a bloody internet forum. SOB
Back to top	Whaaaaaah! I'm a Moron! - edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope IP Logged

Grey

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male

Re: White women breaking with convention?
Reply #77 - May 14^th, 2013 at 12:56pm

Chard wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 9:39am:

Grey wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 1:42am:

Chard wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 12:14am:

Aussie wrote on May 13^th, 2013 at 10:40pm:

[quote]You'd hate my unnatural black ass then. My Pop's family is from Norway, my Mom is Jamiacan, I'm American and I'm married to a white woman from England. I must be the winning combo for your bigot bingo.

Go you good thaing! Dunno what Herbert will make of that given he is a bloke who cannot comprehend the sheer banality of a red bloke marrying a purple sheila, or to be more accurate, a blue sheila with a yellow bloke as her trophy.

Cheesy

So if he found out that I've bedded more white woman than he has it'd be recieved poorly?

Well why would it? By your evidence you are almost certainly more white than black, bearing in mind that there's a lot of white in most Jamaicans. Sure there's a lot of black Norwegians these days, though not in your pops generation. [€/quote]

My point was about Herby's bullshit about mixed-race people. I'm not just visably African-American, mixed-race, and my white wife means I'm set to start the Mocha Master Race. As I have made clear, I have a thing for ladies of the Caucasian persuasion, so imagine how hilarious I found this thread by some white guy whining about us darkies stealin' all da white wimmins. This quality of racist assholery is hard to find in the US now, so it's refreshing to see people that unashamedly bigoted.

My point in saying that Chard, was to have people think about how it is that people who might well genetically be 90% AngloSaxon, but have some extra melination in their skin, invariably identify with 'people of colour'.

I'll go further, I was often the only white at Jamaican parties. I picked up a few looks, but once the people that knew me 'had a word' I was never once made unwelcome. But when I brought along Jamaican friends to white parties, it just didn't work the same. Not that all the white friends I had were racists, but there were some.

I had Indian and Chinese friends too I used to hang with Lords and Ladies, artists and stock brokers. I was curious, that was/is just the way I am. I like diversity, but I have to say of all the groups I ever met I've a particular affection for Jamaicans. Those parties had no age barriers either. Young kids and real oldies all rocked along to the same music and helped each other with food making and stuff. There's a lot about Jamaican culture that's bloody good and of course that's been noted in London which was/is formed and reformed constantly by waves of immigrants since the ice melt made it habitable only 10,000 years ago.

Quote:

http://www.voice-online.co.uk/sites/default/files/imagecache/285x185/NAOMI_CAMPB...

As we say back on the block... black person, please. If you saw a woman that looked like that walking down the street you're going to think "oh, it's a hot black chick", not "oh, it's a hot possibly whitish chick".

Believe it or not I'd think, 'wow, hot chick'. Skin melination doesn't mean more to me than tall/short fat/thin.

Quote:

Herbert - Black kids should grow up with black parents who know how to teach them all the subtleties involved in becoming middle class African-American adults.

because we want our society to be wrapped in stasis, with the same old entrenched prejudices, just carrying on for ever. Guess what, boats, planes and the defeat of the flat earthers changed everything. Get used to it.

Back to top

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33948
Gender: male

Re: White women breaking with convention?
Reply #78 - May 14^th, 2013 at 3:57pm

yes , good posts as per usual grey.

the young girl from sri lanka on the abc in the morning is tres beautiful, as are several of the persian women on al jazeera.

surely its just a matter of personal choice. i have always preferred brunettes and have friends who have always prefered blondes. i doubt its scientific. no more than a preference for the fish or the chicken at one of those awful weddings where they turn it into a swap meet

Back to top

IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: White women breaking with convention?
Reply #79 - May 14^th, 2013 at 4:10pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 8:46am:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 8:39am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 8:36am:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 8:10am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 4:10am:

They arent looking for "black babies". They are looking to help a child in need and its the african children that are in the most need.

SOB

Rabid nonsense.

America has thousands of orphaned black babies and needy young children from crack-head mothers and fathers in jail.

But trendy, morally-conceited bitches like Madonna, Sandra Bullock, et al prefer the glamour and the publicity that comes with returning to the 'States' with human souvenirs in the form of black babies.

Other tourists return home with African wood-carvings of elephants and giraffes ~ but not these Hollywood trendies.

Black kids should grow up with black parents who know how to teach them all the subtleties involved in becoming middle class African-American adults.

Black kids growing up learning the various affectations and attitudes of a white identity are prime targets for bullying and ridicule from fellow black kids.

Why? What does it matter what colour they are?

SOB

Unfortunately you're too ignorant and too immature for me to continue with.

I'm terminating you.

Have a Nice Day.

I see so the troll wont talk to anyone that asks for clarification or disagrees with it.

SOB

You've been quarantined.

Just eat your pudding and be quiet.

Back to top

IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: White women breaking with convention?
Reply #80 - May 14^th, 2013 at 4:16pm

Grey wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 12:56pm:

My point in saying that Chard, was to have people think about how it is that people who might well genetically be 90% AngloSaxon, but have some extra melination in their skin, invariably identify with 'people of colour'.

I'll go further, I was often the only white at Jamaican parties. I picked up a few looks, but once the people that knew me 'had a word' I was never once made unwelcome. But when I brought along Jamaican friends to white parties, it just didn't work the same. Not that all the white friends I had were racists, but there were some.

I had Indian and Chinese friends too I used to hang with Lords and Ladies, artists and stock brokers. I was curious, that was/is just the way I am. I like diversity, but I have to say of all the groups I ever met I've a particular affection for Jamaicans. Those parties had no age barriers either. Young kids and real oldies all rocked along to the same music and helped each other with food making and stuff. There's a lot about Jamaican culture that's bloody good and of course that's been noted in London which was/is formed and reformed constantly by waves of immigrants since the ice melt made it habitable only 10,000 years ago.

Excellent post.

Some substance at last in this thread.

Back to top

IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: White women breaking with convention?
Reply #81 - May 14^th, 2013 at 4:21pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 11:11am:

[quote author=Herbert link=1368431427/73#73 date=1368493594]
I think you owe us an apology.

Especially to the ladies here. Kat and Anthrax.

1) I dont think kat is female

Then a bit of moderating would be in order. Displaying the wrong gender symbol should be outlawed.

Back to top

« Last Edit: May 14^th, 2013 at 4:33pm by Lord Herbert »

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38423
Gender: male

Re: White women breaking with convention?
Reply #82 - May 14^th, 2013 at 4:32pm

Lord Herbert wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 4:16pm:

Grey wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 12:56pm:

My point in saying that Chard, was to have people think about how it is that people who might well genetically be 90% AngloSaxon, but have some extra melination in their skin, invariably identify with 'people of colour'.

I'll go further, I was often the only white at Jamaican parties. I picked up a few looks, but once the people that knew me 'had a word' I was never once made unwelcome. But when I brought along Jamaican friends to white parties, it just didn't work the same. Not that all the white friends I had were racists, but there were some.

I had Indian and Chinese friends too I used to hang with Lords and Ladies, artists and stock brokers. I was curious, that was/is just the way I am. I like diversity, but I have to say of all the groups I ever met I've a particular affection for Jamaicans. Those parties had no age barriers either. Young kids and real oldies all rocked along to the same music and helped each other with food making and stuff. There's a lot about Jamaican culture that's bloody good and of course that's been noted in London which was/is formed and reformed constantly by waves of immigrants since the ice melt made it habitable only 10,000 years ago.

Excellent post.

Some substance at last in this thread.

Back to top

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: White women breaking with convention?
Reply #83 - May 14^th, 2013 at 5:18pm

aquascoot wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 3:57pm:

yes , good posts as per usual grey.

the young girl from sri lanka on the abc in the morning is tres beautiful, as are several of the persian women on al jazeera.

surely its just a matter of personal choice. i have always preferred brunettes and have friends who have always prefered blondes. i doubt its scientific. no more than a preference for the fish or the chicken at one of those awful weddings where they turn it into a swap meet

Superficial charcteristics such as skin, hair, eye colour don't really matter, and will vary with peoples tastes. But traits such as facial symmetry, and an optimal hip/waist ratio (~0.7) are, and have always been universally considered attractive. There actually is a measurable, objective standard of beauty, which closely correlates with signifiers of fertility.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

miketrees Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6490 Gender:	Re: White women breaking with convention? Reply #84 - May 14^th, 2013 at 6:06pm My dog recons we are all just bald monkeys, has no idea what the fuss is about
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38423
Gender: male

Re: White women breaking with convention?
Reply #85 - May 14^th, 2013 at 6:22pm

miketrees wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 6:06pm:

My dog recons we are all just bald monkeys, has no idea what the fuss is about

Yeah.....but it seems important that we know the colour of your dog. Don't be telling us that it is white and is chasing a black (other sex) trophy dog, as that would raise Herbert's quizzical eyebrow.

Back to top

IP Logged

Neferti Gold Member Offline Posts: 7965 Canberra Gender:	Re: White women breaking with convention? Reply #86 - May 14^th, 2013 at 7:23pm NOBODY CARES whether you are married to or whatever. Herbert was just asking a very simple question and it had NOTHING to do with "colour". WHY? Do Black men have bigger dicks? Herbert wants to know. I do too?
Back to top	IP Logged

red baron Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 10204 Blue Mountains Gender:	Re: White women breaking with convention? Reply #87 - May 14^th, 2013 at 7:25pm What did Wesley Snipes (Of Blade fame) say "Always bet on black" but then....Wesley Snipes is in a Federal Prison h'mmmmm.
Back to top	IP Logged

Lord Herbert Gold Member Offline Posts: 34441 Gender:	Re: White women breaking with convention? Reply #88 - May 14^th, 2013 at 8:20pm red baron wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 7:25pm: What did Wesley Snipes (Of Blade fame) say "Always bet on black" but then....Wesley Snipes is in a Federal Prison h'mmmmm. He was released last week. Tax evasion. Good actor. Always a guarantee of a good movie.
Back to top	IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: White women breaking with convention?
Reply #89 - May 14^th, 2013 at 10:08pm

miketrees wrote on May 14^th, 2013 at 6:06pm:

My dog recons we are all just bald monkeys, has no idea what the fuss is about

What a bitch.

But back to the point (or one of the points) raised. Here's an eye opener for all the dozy ones (you know who you are):

Read through the megazillion words on class, income mobility, and poverty in the recent New York Times series “Class Matters” and you still won’t grasp two of the most basic truths on the subject: 1. entrenched, multigenerational poverty is largely black; and 2. it is intricately intertwined with the collapse of the nuclear family in the inner city.

By now, these facts shouldn’t be hard to grasp. Almost

70 percent of black children

are born to single mothers. Those mothers are far more likely than married mothers to be poor, even after a post-welfare-reform decline in child poverty. They are also more likely to pass that poverty on to their children. Sophisticates often try to dodge the implications of this bleak reality by shrugging that single motherhood is an inescapable fact of modern life, affecting everyone from the bobo Murphy Browns to the ghetto “baby mamas.” Not so; it is a largely low-income—and disproportionately black—phenomenon. The vast majority of higher-income women wait to have their children until they are married. The truth is that we are now a two-family nation, separate and unequal—one thriving and intact, and the other struggling, broken, and far too often African-American.

http://www.city-journal.org/html/15_3_black_family.html

Read it all. It is long, detailed, researched, documented.

Back to top

« Last Edit: May 14^th, 2013 at 10:17pm by Soren »

IP Logged