bogarde73 wrote on Jun 1
st, 2014 at 12:04pm:
Peter Freedman wrote on Jun 1
st, 2014 at 11:58am:
Have just started Breaking News, Sex and Lies and the Murdoch Success Story by Paul Barry.
Have got far enough for this quote by Pulitzer Prize winner, Mike Royko as he walked out the door of The Chicago Sun Times as Murdoch took it over: "From what I've seen of Murdoch newspapers I don't know of any self respecting fish that would want to be wrapped in one".
PS: 59 other journalists and executives must have thought the same thing as they all left as well!
But aren't newspapers just a business like any other and therefore the owners are entitled to run it how they like? Within the law of course.
No, they are not. Newspapers are not like any other business. They are the eyes of the people to what is going on in the world.
No other businesses, except, of course radio and TV, have that role.
Murdoch runs ALL his TV stations and newspapers and you see the results. They are constantly mirroring Murdoch's views, biases and political leanings.
That one man should have such power over what people read and see is both dangerous and obscene.
Never once in 25 years as a journo, did I have an owner tell me what to write or how to write it.
Sometimes they would suggest a story but always added: "Pete, you're a good journalist, it's entirely over to you".
Often the suggestion was a good one. When the story appeared, the owner would come into the newsroom holding a copy of the paper and smiling broadly.
It's called "editorial freedom".
Who knows what is news? The owner or an experienced reporter?
It's that simple. But it is also crucial.
It differentiates real newspapers and TV stations from crap like
The Australian and
Fox News.