Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 5
Send Topic Print
Dumb, dumber and dumberer... (Read 4050 times)
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Jun 12th, 2013 at 2:59pm
 
Dumb, Dumber and Dumberer. With all due reverence to the classic movie Dumb and Dumber (don’t watch the sequel!) this movie could star Julia Gillard if there was to ever be the political remake of it.
Gillard’s political strategy skills have always been pretty average at best with the occasional foray into the poor category, but 2013 has shown us the New Julia or the Real Julia or whoever she is supposed to be today.  And this Julia is a downright terrible political tactician. Well behind in the polls at the start of this year, we saw the Government going after media with a set of draconian and obviously punitive legislation. You desperately need the media on board to help power your come-back so what is the obvious solution?  Punish them of course. Dumb.

So you have a leadership contender? Not really news since every party always has a few people around the periphery checking out the top job. Leadership fights are par for the course and can be unsettling to any party. So what do you do if you are the Labor Party? You take your fight to the airwaves and the streets and publically vilify the former PM and frankly, the only current Labor MP with a popularity above zero and the one-time holder of the most popular PM title ever.  Read that again. EVER! Dumber. But at least they are preparing for round three of the “let’s vent our collective spleen in public” game!

It would be hard to top such amateurish and frankly, infantile behaviour but our not-so-beloved PM has managed to pull out a ‘dumberer’. Against such worthy competition for dumbest stunt ever, Gillard decided to attack men. Not just content with maligning Tony Abbott with sexism charges and misogyny claims last year, this time she went after men – all men.  Pure political genius – if you were planning to lose by the biggest margin possible. If there was any doubt before that Gillard was the real sexist on the front bench then there is no more. The claim of misandry (men hating) has a lot of evidence and more is mounting.  Julia Gillard hates men. Pure and simple and increasingly difficult to deny.  So now we can scratch another couple percent of Labor’s woeful polls.
All throughout her term as PM Gillard has demonstrated a poor understanding of political strategy but instead of learning her craft and honing her skills as Tony Abbot has, she has gotten more arrogant and at the same time, much worse at her job. While Abbott has been improving his public performances and even developing some late-run skills in diplomacy and statesmanship, Gillard has been showing just what a disaster she has been as Prime Minister.

The gaffe-prone PM has claimed that the Coalition will get rid of women in parliament which is an offensive claim as well as manifestly stupid. But there is one thing Gillard has done for the future of women in parliament. She has set their cause back a generation. In the years after Gillard, women will be put off from entering politics because the big jobs will appear to be denied them and that will be because the experience of a woman PM was such a disaster that no party will want to risk it again for a long, long time. Julia Gillard is arguably the worst PM in history vying for the title from Billy MacMahon having already eclipsed Gough Whitlam’s efforts.

I don’t know what the next word after Dumb, Dumber and Dumberer is. Unfortunately, it appears I better go to work thinking one up. I will obviously need it.

Stay tune for the next act in “How I destroyed the ALP without really trying...”
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 75379
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #1 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 3:01pm
 
After reading the title of this thread I would have sworn it would be a thread about Maqqa, progs and Longloser ... I guess I was wrong.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #2 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 3:07pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 3:01pm:
After reading the title of this thread I would have sworn it would be a thread about Maqqa, progs and Longloser ... I guess I was wrong.


given your inability to respond to the OP I guess you are at least dumber or is it dumberer?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 75379
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #3 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 3:09pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 3:07pm:
John Smith wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 3:01pm:
After reading the title of this thread I would have sworn it would be a thread about Maqqa, progs and Longloser ... I guess I was wrong.


given your inability to respond to the OP I guess you are at least dumber or is it dumberer?


you title your thread dumb dumber and dumberer (now who's the dumb one, it's not even a word you moron) and then you expect serious comments? really?
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #4 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 3:19pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 2:59pm:
Dumb, Dumber and Dumberer. With all due reverence to the classic movie Dumb and Dumber (don’t watch the sequel!) this movie could star Julia Gillard if there was to ever be the political remake of it.
Gillard’s political strategy skills have always been pretty average at best with the occasional foray into the poor category, but 2013 has shown us the New Julia or the Real Julia or whoever she is supposed to be today.  And this Julia is a downright terrible political tactician. Well behind in the polls at the start of this year, we saw the Government going after media with a set of draconian and obviously punitive legislation. You desperately need the media on board to help power your come-back so what is the obvious solution?  Punish them of course. Dumb.

So you have a leadership contender? Not really news since every party always has a few people around the periphery checking out the top job. Leadership fights are par for the course and can be unsettling to any party. So what do you do if you are the Labor Party? You take your fight to the airwaves and the streets and publically vilify the former PM and frankly, the only current Labor MP with a popularity above zero and the one-time holder of the most popular PM title ever.  Read that again. EVER! Dumber. But at least they are preparing for round three of the “let’s vent our collective spleen in public” game!

It would be hard to top such amateurish and frankly, infantile behaviour but our not-so-beloved PM has managed to pull out a ‘dumberer’. Against such worthy competition for dumbest stunt ever, Gillard decided to attack men. Not just content with maligning Tony Abbott with sexism charges and misogyny claims last year, this time she went after men – all men.  Pure political genius – if you were planning to lose by the biggest margin possible. If there was any doubt before that Gillard was the real sexist on the front bench then there is no more. The claim of misandry (men hating) has a lot of evidence and more is mounting.  Julia Gillard hates men. Pure and simple and increasingly difficult to deny.  So now we can scratch another couple percent of Labor’s woeful polls.
All throughout her term as PM Gillard has demonstrated a poor understanding of political strategy but instead of learning her craft and honing her skills as Tony Abbot has, she has gotten more arrogant and at the same time, much worse at her job. While Abbott has been improving his public performances and even developing some late-run skills in diplomacy and statesmanship, Gillard has been showing just what a disaster she has been as Prime Minister.

The gaffe-prone PM has claimed that the Coalition will get rid of women in parliament which is an offensive claim as well as manifestly stupid. But there is one thing Gillard has done for the future of women in parliament. She has set their cause back a generation. In the years after Gillard, women will be put off from entering politics because the big jobs will appear to be denied them and that will be because the experience of a woman PM was such a disaster that no party will want to risk it again for a long, long time. Julia Gillard is arguably the worst PM in history vying for the title from Billy MacMahon having already eclipsed Gough Whitlam’s efforts.

I don’t know what the next word after Dumb, Dumber and Dumberer is. Unfortunately, it appears I better go to work thinking one up. I will obviously need it.

Stay tune for the next act in “How I destroyed the ALP without really trying...”


No offence, I stopped reading as it became a rather dull rant that stinks of misunderstanding.

For the most part, I will agree with Latham in that the destabilising that has occurred has been all Rudd, Rudd and Rudd.  Fact is, polls are crap. Rudd takes advantage of this and takes the fight to the streets. What choice does Gillard exactly have?

As for attacking men, while yesterday I agreed it was stupid, today watching the likes of Hockey and dumbf**k Brough I'd agree with her.  What a disgrace. What an utter disgrace to sit around, more than likely laugh, and only when it becomes public news to back track and claim they've never read it. The first ting they should've done is walked out. Full stop. They are either going for public office, or in public office. To sit around at a fundraiser where this types of things are considered "hilarious" is not befit of any politician.  As for Gillard, your claim she hates men is rubbish. She hates Abbott and his merry men. And they don't stnad for what I stand, and for the fact that they would participate in such casual sexism as politicians who should know better...well... I hate them too. They are a disgrace to my sex.

As for Abbott, well I'm sorry but again I bring up his maternity leave scheme and say that unless someone can show me otherwise, how does his maternity leave scheme NOT stink of a man who thinks women are the ones who need to stay home and be housewifes, and is putting in a policy that will guarantee it?  And his past statements on women?  it all goes towards his inner beliefs, and gaffes some may be, gaffes nonetheless tell us more about a person than their carefully written statements.

And lest we forget his punching frenzy.  Although recent news suggests he doesn't just intimidate women, but anyone who stands in his way. What a wank job.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 12th, 2013 at 3:24pm by sir prince duke alevine »  

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #5 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 3:36pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 3:09pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 3:07pm:
John Smith wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 3:01pm:
After reading the title of this thread I would have sworn it would be a thread about Maqqa, progs and Longloser ... I guess I was wrong.


given your inability to respond to the OP I guess you are at least dumber or is it dumberer?


you title your thread dumb dumber and dumberer (now who's the dumb one, it's not even a word you moron) and then you expect serious comments? really?


you've never heard of the movie Dumber and Dumberer?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #6 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:09pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 3:19pm:
[quote author=longweekend58 link=1371013167/0#0 date=1371013167]Dumb, Dumber and Dumberer. With all due reverence to the classic movie Dumb and Dumber (don’t watch the sequel!) this movie could star Julia Gillard if there was to ever be the political remake of it.
Gillard’s political strategy skills have always been pretty average at best with the occasional foray into the poor category, but 2013 has shown us the New Julia or the Real Julia or whoever she is supposed to be today.  And this Julia is a downright terrible political tactician. Well behind in the polls at the start of this year, we saw the Government going after media with a set of draconian and obviously punitive legislation. You desperately need the media on board to help power your come-back so what is the obvious solution?  Punish them of course. Dumb.

So you have a leadership contender? Not really news since every party always has a few people around the periphery checking out the top job. Leadership fights are par for the course and can be unsettling to any party. So what do you do if you are the Labor Party? You take your fight to the airwaves and the streets and publically vilify the former PM and frankly, the only current Labor MP with a popularity above zero and the one-time holder of the most popular PM title ever.  Read that again. EVER! Dumber. But at least they are preparing for round three of the “let’s vent our collective spleen in public” game!

It would be hard to top such amateurish and frankly, infantile behaviour but our not-so-beloved PM has managed to pull out a ‘dumberer’. Against such worthy competition for dumbest stunt ever, Gillard decided to attack men. Not just content with maligning Tony Abbott with sexism charges and misogyny claims last year, this time she went after men – all men.  Pure political genius – if you were planning to lose by the biggest margin possible. If there was any doubt before that Gillard was the real sexist on the front bench then there is no more. The claim of misandry (men hating) has a
The gaffe-prone PM has claimed that the Coalition will get rid of women in parliament which is an offensive claim as well as manifestly stupid. But there is one thing Gillard has done for the future of women in parliament. She has set their cause back a generation. In the years after Gillard, women will be put off from entering politics because the big jobs will appear to be denied them and that will be because the experience of a woman PM was such a disaster that no party will want to risk it again for a long, long time. Julia Gillard is arguably the worst PM in history vying for the title from Billy MacMahon having already eclipsed Gough Whitlam’s efforts.


For the most part, I will agree with Latham in that the destabilising that has occurred has been all Rudd, Rudd and Rudd.  Fact is, polls are crap. Rudd takes advantage of this and takes the fight to the streets. What choice does Gillard exactly have?

As for attacking men, while yesterday I agreed it was stupid, today watching the likes of Hockey and dumbf**k Brough I'd agree with her.  What a disgrace. What an utter disgrace to sit around, more than likely laugh, and only when it becomes public news to back track and claim they've never read it. The first ting they should've done is walked out. Full stop. They are either going for public office, or in public office. To sit around at a fundraiser where this types of things are considered "hilarious" is not befit of any politician.  As for Gillard, your claim she hates men is rubbish. She hates Abbott and his merry men. And they don't stnad for what I stand, and for the fact that they would participate in such casual sexism as politicians who should know better...well... I hate them too. They are a disgrace to my sex.

As for Abbott, well I'm sorry but again I bring up his maternity leave scheme and say that unless someone can show me otherwise, how does his maternity leave scheme NOT stink of a man who thinks women are the ones who need to stay home and be housewifes, and is putting in a policy that will guarantee it?  And his past statements on women?  it all goes towards his inner beliefs, and gaffes some may be, gaffes nonetheless tell us more about a person than their carefully written statements.

And lest we forget his punching frenzy.  Although recent news suggests he doesn't just intimidate women, but anyone who stands in his way. What a wank job.


the only response that would have gained u credit would be to agree that Gillard's speech was appalling. to seek to dismiss it makes you look silly. a stupid menu which btw was NOT sexist; it was just offensive and rude. No comment on the comments about RUdd in the menu? of course not. poor, precious Gillard must by virtue of being a women be granted a completely different set of standards than men.

the response to the menu further confirms that Labor is inherently sexist as well as grossly incompetent.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #7 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:25pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:09pm:
[quote author=alevine link=1371013167/4#4 date=1371014390]

the only response that would have gained u credit would be to agree that Gillard's speech was appalling. to seek to dismiss it makes you look silly. a stupid menu which btw was NOT sexist; it was just offensive and rude. No comment on the comments about RUdd in the menu? of course not. poor, precious Gillard must by virtue of being a women be granted a completely different set of standards than men.

the response to the menu further confirms that Labor is inherently sexist as well as grossly incompetent.


I think you're completely lost with regard to what is sexist and what isn't.  The fact that you disregard, and claim that Gillard's speech was appalling just shows that you're no better than Brough, Hockey and their master Tony.  Despicable. Rather than argue the points I make you simply revert back to your own rubbish - typical, typical, typical.   Interesting how Rudd's comments are about his mentality, and Gillard's about her physique and yet you think it isn't sexist.  Interesting that you don't wish to talk of Tony's gaffes or his own policy that HE instrumented, and instead want to simply call anyone calling him out "appalling."  Interesting that we have these types of "men" within the Liberal Party, who find it humerous to comment on a woman as if she were some peice of consumerist art and you stick with, "oh but her speech calling it out is appalling."  You are despicable. Disgusting that you find "nothing wrong with that." And instead find something wrong with "men in blue ties."  Yes. I get it, you're the dumberer.  Got it.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #8 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:37pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:25pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:09pm:
[quote author=alevine link=1371013167/4#4 date=1371014390]

the only response that would have gained u credit would be to agree that Gillard's speech was appalling. to seek to dismiss it makes you look silly. a stupid menu which btw was NOT sexist; it was just offensive and rude. No comment on the comments about RUdd in the menu? of course not. poor, precious Gillard must by virtue of being a women be granted a completely different set of standards than men.

the response to the menu further confirms that Labor is inherently sexist as well as grossly incompetent.


I think you're completely lost with regard to what is sexist and what isn't.  The fact that you disregard, and claim that Gillard's speech was appalling just shows that you're no better than Brough, Hockey and their master Tony.  Despicable. Rather than argue the points I make you simply revert back to your own rubbish - typical, typical, typical.   Interesting how Rudd's comments are about his mentality, and Gillard's about her physique and yet you think it isn't sexist.  Interesting that you don't wish to talk of Tony's gaffes or his own policy that HE instrumented, and instead want to simply call anyone calling him out "appalling."  Interesting that we have these types of "men" within the Liberal Party, who find it humerous to comment on a woman as if she were some peice of consumerist art and you stick with, "oh but her speech calling it out is appalling."  You are despicable. Disgusting that you find "nothing wrong with that." And instead find something wrong with "men in blue ties."  Yes. I get it, you're the dumberer.  Got it.


Que the "Intellectual Elite" insult Wink


A+, Al
Back to top
 

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #9 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:42pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:25pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:09pm:
[quote author=alevine link=1371013167/4#4 date=1371014390]

the only response that would have gained u credit would be to agree that Gillard's speech was appalling. to seek to dismiss it makes you look silly. a stupid menu which btw was NOT sexist; it was just offensive and rude. No comment on the comments about RUdd in the menu? of course not. poor, precious Gillard must by virtue of being a women be granted a completely different set of standards than men.

the response to the menu further confirms that Labor is inherently sexist as well as grossly incompetent.


I think you're completely lost with regard to what is sexist and what isn't.  The fact that you disregard, and claim that Gillard's speech was appalling just shows that you're no better than Brough, Hockey and their master Tony.  Despicable. Rather than argue the points I make you simply revert back to your own rubbish - typical, typical, typical.   Interesting how Rudd's comments are about his mentality, and Gillard's about her physique and yet you think it isn't sexist.  Interesting that you don't wish to talk of Tony's gaffes or his own policy that HE instrumented, and instead want to simply call anyone calling him out "appalling."  Interesting that we have these types of "men" within the Liberal Party, who find it humerous to comment on a woman as if she were some peice of consumerist art and you stick with, "oh but her speech calling it out is appalling."  You are despicable. Disgusting that you find "nothing wrong with that." And instead find something wrong with "men in blue ties."  Yes. I get it, you're the dumberer.  Got it.


I think you are one of the few that aren't disgusted with Gillard today. if your standards are so low I wonder would you WOULD object to?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #10 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:45pm
 
Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:37pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:25pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:09pm:
[quote author=alevine link=1371013167/4#4 date=1371014390]

the only response that would have gained u credit would be to agree that Gillard's speech was appalling. to seek to dismiss it makes you look silly. a stupid menu which btw was NOT sexist; it was just offensive and rude. No comment on the comments about RUdd in the menu? of course not. poor, precious Gillard must by virtue of being a women be granted a completely different set of standards than men.

the response to the menu further confirms that Labor is inherently sexist as well as grossly incompetent.


I think you're completely lost with regard to what is sexist and what isn't.  The fact that you disregard, and claim that Gillard's speech was appalling just shows that you're no better than Brough, Hockey and their master Tony.  Despicable. Rather than argue the points I make you simply revert back to your own rubbish - typical, typical, typical.   Interesting how Rudd's comments are about his mentality, and Gillard's about her physique and yet you think it isn't sexist.  Interesting that you don't wish to talk of Tony's gaffes or his own policy that HE instrumented, and instead want to simply call anyone calling him out "appalling."  Interesting that we have these types of "men" within the Liberal Party, who find it humerous to comment on a woman as if she were some peice of consumerist art and you stick with, "oh but her speech calling it out is appalling."  You are despicable. Disgusting that you find "nothing wrong with that." And instead find something wrong with "men in blue ties."  Yes. I get it, you're the dumberer.  Got it.


Que the "Intellectual Elite" insult Wink


A+, Al


do u generally think that Gillard is not dismissive of men in a manner that is rather disturbing? On budget night she filled EVERY SEAT behind Swan with women. and on it goes. It would be pretty hard to fairly define her speech as anything less than sexist. It was a full-on assault on men and filled with lies (not surprising) and offensive nonsense.

as a man with a sense of justice and equity you should be appalled by this women who clearly does not share such values.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #11 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:55pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:42pm:
[quote author=alevine link=1371013167/7#7 date=1371018359]

I think you are one of the few that aren't disgusted with Gillard today. if your standards are so low I wonder would you WOULD object to?


Still no debate. Just the typical quick jab without substance.  Oh well. Have a nice day, longie.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #12 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:56pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:45pm:
Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:37pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:25pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:09pm:
[quote author=alevine link=1371013167/4#4 date=1371014390]

the only response that would have gained u credit would be to agree that Gillard's speech was appalling. to seek to dismiss it makes you look silly. a stupid menu which btw was NOT sexist; it was just offensive and rude. No comment on the comments about RUdd in the menu? of course not. poor, precious Gillard must by virtue of being a women be granted a completely different set of standards than men.

the response to the menu further confirms that Labor is inherently sexist as well as grossly incompetent.


I think you're completely lost with regard to what is sexist and what isn't.  The fact that you disregard, and claim that Gillard's speech was appalling just shows that you're no better than Brough, Hockey and their master Tony.  Despicable. Rather than argue the points I make you simply revert back to your own rubbish - typical, typical, typical.   Interesting how Rudd's comments are about his mentality, and Gillard's about her physique and yet you think it isn't sexist.  Interesting that you don't wish to talk of Tony's gaffes or his own policy that HE instrumented, and instead want to simply call anyone calling him out "appalling."  Interesting that we have these types of "men" within the Liberal Party, who find it humerous to comment on a woman as if she were some peice of consumerist art and you stick with, "oh but her speech calling it out is appalling."  You are despicable. Disgusting that you find "nothing wrong with that." And instead find something wrong with "men in blue ties."  Yes. I get it, you're the dumberer.  Got it.


Que the "Intellectual Elite" insult Wink


A+, Al


do u generally think that Gillard is not dismissive of men in a manner that is rather disturbing? On budget night she filled EVERY SEAT behind Swan with women. and on it goes. It would be pretty hard to fairly define her speech as anything less than sexist. It was a full-on assault on men and filled with lies (not surprising) and offensive nonsense.

as a man with a sense of justice and equity you should be appalled by this women who clearly does not share such values.

Look at you try to fill in the dots, how amusing. It wasn't a full on assault on men. It was an assault on Tony Abbott and his party. And once again, if you were to actually debate the merits of this assault perhaps it would be interesting. But otherwise you can continue to feel your outrage with hot air.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #13 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:57pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 12th, 2013 at 4:45pm:
as a man with a sense of justice and equity you should be appalled by this women who clearly does not share such values.



I am appalled & have been appalled at the treatment our PM has received since taking office.

You want me to be outraged well I am just not at this pathetic attempt to smear her again.

Yes I admit just like AL yesterday I just shook my head, but today after being outed again somehow it doesn't matter if it a liberal, I seem to remember a very different response when a VERBAL joke was made about Abbott & his CoS, calls on why government ministers hadn't walked, a very somber looking Hockey wagging his finger, yet this is in print, on the table hardly something they didn't know was there or coming, unlike a verbal joke.

The deflection I have seen, the venom I have heard, the personal insults, the use of personal grief as some sort of weapon sickens me Angry, and makes me wonder what we are becoming.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 12th, 2013 at 5:03pm by Dsmithy70 »  

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Dumb, dumber and dumberer...
Reply #14 - Jun 12th, 2013 at 5:08pm
 
As usual, the double standard persists. It's okay for Gillard to be insulting, rude and offensive to men in her spec last night that was at a campaign rally called 'Women for Gillard's. Just imagine of it had been the reverse - a campaign called 'Men for Abbott, and Abbott had made similar comments? Oh what the outcry and moral high round would be from those of the left.

It's funny how we didn't see the same moral outcry from those of the left when a disgusting 'joke' was made about Peta Credlin, at an event attended by several Labor MPs about half of which did not leave after the 'joke' was made. Nor did we see it when a Labor backbencher called Julie Bishop a narcissistic bimbo.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 5
Send Topic Print