gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 25
th, 2013 at 9:02pm:
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 25
th, 2013 at 5:00pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 25
th, 2013 at 8:51am:
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24
th, 2013 at 7:11pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24
th, 2013 at 7:03pm:
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24
th, 2013 at 6:58pm:
Greggery, you told us:
Given that I saw a report from a NASA research unit today that stated just the opposite (Co2 and Nitrogen, I believe) act together to reflect incoming solar radiation out into space. SO reducing the Co2 would, according to that report, actually increase warming..
No, I didn't.
It appears that in the midst of your rage you have mistaken me for someone else.
You are absolutely right and I apologise most profusely old boy.
Of course - the culprit is the known liar Gizmo.
Adding to his list of whoppers.
I do admit that I was confused by the interlocking quotes and attributed the lie to you in what was an unforgivable error. I am full of shame. I do hope you can find it in the goodness of your heart to forgive me this appalling transgression.
Still - you can hardly blame me though. You do have a record for saying some really stupid stuff about this subject. Just not this time....though why you would be trolling about posting a link to one of the stupidest websites I have ever seen is beyond me.
It's not a lie Rabbit, in light of that report, it is possible that decreasing Co2 levels in the thermosphere would allow more heat from solar flares etc into Earth's atmosphere. It might not have anything to do with climate change however, it's separate subject and I posted it in response to a comment from miketrees.
Please show us where that NASA report says reducing the Co2 would actually increase warming..You told us:
SO reducing the Co2 would, according to that report, actually increase warming.. Yes, that is the implication of that report..
Simply put, at the moment, Co2 and Nitrogen in the thermosphere react to reflect, or re radiate heat (in the form of IR radiation) from solar flares back into space. So reducing the amount of Co2 in the upper atmosphere would stop this from happening. More IR radiation would get through the thermosphere and the temperatures would (probably) increase.
Simply put - you are a liar.
You claimed:
SO reducing the Co2 would, according to that report, actually increase warming.. [/quote]
THat was a direct lie.. It said nothing of the sort. If it did you would post us a quote and prove me wrong.
But you can't , can you liar.
Just like when you lied about the UK Met Office reporting
no warming for 16 years.. If this were actually true - you would post a link to the report and prove me wrong.
But you can't , can you liar.
Who do you actually think you are fooling liar? You are not smart enough to lie and get away with it. Why do you even bother trying?
So, I ask again:
- please show us where the UK Met Office reporting
no warming for 16 years., and
- please show us where in that NASA report that they say
"reducing the Co2 would actually increase warming"Show us liar.
We are waiting.
And if you cant do it - please apologise for lying to the forum.
Forum
Pages: 
