Australian Politics Forum - Have a read of this hysterical shite!

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #75 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 4:52pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2013 at 9:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2013 at 8:16pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2013 at 8:10pm:

miketrees wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2013 at 7:56pm:

Well Gizometer we could take the temperature of other planets in our solar system, or even our own moon and see if the Sun is contributing to the increase in temperature.

But even then if we proved it was caused by the Sun, wouldent we want to try something to keep our cool?

Perhaps even with more incoming solar radiation we could lower temps by lowering CO2

Given that I saw a report from a NASA research unit today that stated just the opposite (Co2 and Nitrogen, I believe) act together to reflect incoming solar radiation out into space. SO reducing the Co2 would, according to that report, actually increase warming..

And just for you rabbitoh, I'll have a look for the link later.

http://principia-scientific.org/supportnews/latest-news/163-new-discovery-nasa-s...

Whoah!!! Greggery!!!

You really are diving into moonbat territory with that link!

Principia-Scientific!

Who are they when they are at home?!?!

They are the people with a direct link to the NASA report in the first few words of their story.

You do know who NASA are, don't you?

Let me guess though: you won't accept any report from NASA either.

THere is nothing wrong with the NASA report. It is your bizarre link.

The NASA report does not say "reducing the Co2 would, according to that report, actually increase warming.." as you and your mates at Principia-Scientific claim

Even the King of Deniers at Wattsupwith that has dismissed them as fruit loops
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/28/a-misinterpreted-claim-about-a-nasa-press-...

THe NASA report is about CO2 in the thermosphere - not the troposphere.

Stop being so gullible Greggery

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #76 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 4:56pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

the whole problem with AGW cult members: their minds are so closed that they will not even entertain the thought of even looking at anything that suggests that their hypothesis may be wrong.

the whole problem with deniers: their minds are so retarded that they even entertain the thought of looking at anything...no matter how ridiculous it is.
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

In all my life, I have never come across a more closed-minded group of people than the AGW disciples. They are quite possibly the most unscientific people on the planet.

in all my life, I have never come across a more gullible fool

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

Personally, I remain completely open-minded: the AGW hypothesis may indeed be correct, and I may come to accept it in the future. I will continue to read any new information on the subject. I won't shoot the messenger. I won't refuse to read a report just because it goes against my current opinion.
Currently though, there's no credible convincing evidence that the AGW hypothesis is correct.

I remain open-minded though ...

No Greggery. You remain ignorant. Ignorant is not the same as "open minded"

Back to top

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #77 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:06pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 4:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

the whole problem with AGW cult members: their minds are so closed that they will not even entertain the thought of even looking at anything that suggests that their hypothesis may be wrong.

the whole problem with deniers: their minds are so retarded that they even entertain the thought of looking at anything...no matter how ridiculous it is.
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

In all my life, I have never come across a more closed-minded group of people than the AGW disciples. They are quite possibly the most unscientific people on the planet.

in all my life, I have never come across a more gullible fool

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

Personally, I remain completely open-minded: the AGW hypothesis may indeed be correct, and I may come to accept it in the future. I will continue to read any new information on the subject. I won't shoot the messenger. I won't refuse to read a report just because it goes against my current opinion.
Currently though, there's no credible convincing evidence that the AGW hypothesis is correct.

I remain open-minded though ...

No Greggery. You remain ignorant. Ignorant is not the same as "open minded"

LOL

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #78 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:08pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 4:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

the whole problem with AGW cult members: their minds are so closed that they will not even entertain the thought of even looking at anything that suggests that their hypothesis may be wrong.

the whole problem with deniers: their minds are so retarded that they even entertain the thought of looking at anything...no matter how ridiculous it is.
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

In all my life, I have never come across a more closed-minded group of people than the AGW disciples. They are quite possibly the most unscientific people on the planet.

in all my life, I have never come across a more gullible fool

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

Personally, I remain completely open-minded: the AGW hypothesis may indeed be correct, and I may come to accept it in the future. I will continue to read any new information on the subject. I won't shoot the messenger. I won't refuse to read a report just because it goes against my current opinion.
Currently though, there's no credible convincing evidence that the AGW hypothesis is correct.

I remain open-minded though ...

No Greggery. You remain ignorant. Ignorant is not the same as "open minded"

LOL and stupid and pigheaded remains stupid and pigheaded..

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139554
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #79 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:21pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 4:56pm:

No Greggery. You remain ignorant. Ignorant is not the same as "open minded"

No.

I'm actually very well informed on this subject.

Unlike you, and your fellow AGW disciples, I read as much material as possible from both sides of the argument.

Once you start to do the same thing, and stop relying on non-scientific nonsense like 'consensus', you might start to look a little less silly.

Moreover, confusing the two terms "ignorant" and "open-minded" has severely diminished your already dwindling credibility.

Stick to the science, read widely on the subject, and open your mind a little and you just might gain some credibility in the future. Remaining a closed-minded alarmist will get you nowhere fast.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:27pm by greggerypeccary »

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139554 Gender:	Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite! Reply #80 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:26pm rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 4:56pm: in all my life, I have never come across a more gullible fool You seem to be having difficulty today understanding exactly what words mean. Calling me "gullible" in regard to this subject is not only extremely inaccurate, it is delightfully ironic.
Back to top	IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #81 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:35pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:21pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 4:56pm:

No Greggery. You remain ignorant. Ignorant is not the same as "open minded"

No.

I'm actually very well informed on this subject.

Unlike you, and your fellow AGW disciples, I read as much material as possible from both sides of the argument.

Once you start to do the same thing, and stop relying on non-scientific nonsense like 'consensus', you might start to look a little less silly.

Moreover, confusing the two terms "ignorant" and "open-minded" has severely diminished your already dwindling credibility.

Stick to the science, read widely on the subject, and open your mind a little and you just might gain some credibility in the future. Remaining a closed-minded alarmist will get you nowhere fast.

You are very well informed?!?!

This is why you posted a link from a website that doesn't know the difference between the thermosphere and the troposphere!!!

Yeah...you are really well informed!!

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139554
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #82 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:39pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:21pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 4:56pm:

No Greggery. You remain ignorant. Ignorant is not the same as "open minded"

No.

I'm actually very well informed on this subject.

Unlike you, and your fellow AGW disciples, I read as much material as possible from both sides of the argument.

Once you start to do the same thing, and stop relying on non-scientific nonsense like 'consensus', you might start to look a little less silly.

Moreover, confusing the two terms "ignorant" and "open-minded" has severely diminished your already dwindling credibility.

Stick to the science, read widely on the subject, and open your mind a little and you just might gain some credibility in the future. Remaining a closed-minded alarmist will get you nowhere fast.

You are very well informed?!?!

This is why you posted a link from a website that doesn't know the difference between the thermosphere and the troposphere!!!

Yeah...you are really well informed!!

And now it seems that you don't understand what "well informed" means either.

What's the problem today bunny?

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #83 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:40pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:08pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 4:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

the whole problem with AGW cult members: their minds are so closed that they will not even entertain the thought of even looking at anything that suggests that their hypothesis may be wrong.

the whole problem with deniers: their minds are so retarded that they even entertain the thought of looking at anything...no matter how ridiculous it is.
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

In all my life, I have never come across a more closed-minded group of people than the AGW disciples. They are quite possibly the most unscientific people on the planet.

in all my life, I have never come across a more gullible fool

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

Personally, I remain completely open-minded: the AGW hypothesis may indeed be correct, and I may come to accept it in the future. I will continue to read any new information on the subject. I won't shoot the messenger. I won't refuse to read a report just because it goes against my current opinion.
Currently though, there's no credible convincing evidence that the AGW hypothesis is correct.

I remain open-minded though ...

No Greggery. You remain ignorant. Ignorant is not the same as "open minded"

LOL and stupid and pigheaded remains stupid and pigheaded..

ANd a LIAR is still a LIAR.

And you are a LIAR.

We are still waiting for you to explain to us why you claimed that the UK Met Office issued a report saying that there has been no warming for 16 years

Why no answer LIAR?

Is it because the UK Met Office said no such thing? You simply saw a column in a British tabloid that claimed that and you believed it because you are ignorant and gullible?

You have been accused of being a LIAR. Why no response?
Surely - if you were not lying - you would have shown us the evidence to support your claim by now? But no. Nothing from you.

You are simply a liar that gets all of his information from tabloid journalists and shock-jocks.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #84 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:43pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:39pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:21pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 4:56pm:

No Greggery. You remain ignorant. Ignorant is not the same as "open minded"

No.

I'm actually very well informed on this subject.

Unlike you, and your fellow AGW disciples, I read as much material as possible from both sides of the argument.

Once you start to do the same thing, and stop relying on non-scientific nonsense like 'consensus', you might start to look a little less silly.

Moreover, confusing the two terms "ignorant" and "open-minded" has severely diminished your already dwindling credibility.

Stick to the science, read widely on the subject, and open your mind a little and you just might gain some credibility in the future. Remaining a closed-minded alarmist will get you nowhere fast.

You are very well informed?!?!

This is why you posted a link from a website that doesn't know the difference between the thermosphere and the troposphere!!!

Yeah...you are really well informed!!

And now it seems that you don't understand what "well informed" means either.

What's the problem today bunny?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermosphere
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troposphere

It must be very embarrassing getting sprung like you just were Greggery.
Are you going to be a little bit more discerning in future before posting links for us?

A "well-informed" man like you!!!

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139554
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #85 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:49pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:39pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:21pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 4:56pm:

No Greggery. You remain ignorant. Ignorant is not the same as "open minded"

No.

I'm actually very well informed on this subject.

Unlike you, and your fellow AGW disciples, I read as much material as possible from both sides of the argument.

Once you start to do the same thing, and stop relying on non-scientific nonsense like 'consensus', you might start to look a little less silly.

Moreover, confusing the two terms "ignorant" and "open-minded" has severely diminished your already dwindling credibility.

Stick to the science, read widely on the subject, and open your mind a little and you just might gain some credibility in the future. Remaining a closed-minded alarmist will get you nowhere fast.

You are very well informed?!?!

This is why you posted a link from a website that doesn't know the difference between the thermosphere and the troposphere!!!

Yeah...you are really well informed!!

And now it seems that you don't understand what "well informed" means either.

What's the problem today bunny?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermosphere
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troposphere

It must be very embarrassing getting sprung like you just were Greggery.
Are you going to be a little bit more discerning in future before posting links for us?

A "well-informed" man like you!!!

1. It's not my web page bunny: I didn't write the content.

2. The first few words contained a link to the NASA report: that is the important piece of information that was being referred to. Everybody else got that except you.

3. You just cited wikipedia as a reference - twice!

Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #86 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:49pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:21pm:

Unlike you, and your fellow AGW disciples, I read as much material as possible from both sides of the argument.

Yes - and you obviously don't understand any of it.

That is why when you read something from some nutjob website that doesn't know the difference bewteen the troposphere and the thermosphere - you think it is something worth repeating!!!

Moron.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:21pm:

Once you start to do the same thing, and stop relying on non-scientific nonsense like 'consensus', you might start to look a little less silly.

Ones you have some clue about what you are talking about - you wont sound like such a retard.

Have you looked up the difference between troposphere and thermosphere yet?

I suggest you do.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:21pm:

Moreover, confusing the two terms "ignorant" and "open-minded" has severely diminished your already dwindling credibility.

You have never had any credibility Greggery.

And posting a link from "Principia Scientific" just confirmed it.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:21pm:

Stick to the science, read widely on the subject, and open your mind a little and you just might gain some credibility in the future.

Learn a little bit about what you are trying to discuss - and don't blindly believe every stupid blog you come across you just might sound not so stupid in the future.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:21pm:

Remaining a closed-minded alarmist will get you nowhere fast.

Where is being an ignorant, gullible twat getting you Greggery?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139554
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #87 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:51pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:49pm:

That is why when you read something from some nutjob website that doesn't know the difference bewteen the troposphere and the thermosphere - you think it is something worth repeating!!!

Moron.

The report is from NASA.

There's certainly no doubt about who the (ignorant) moron is.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #88 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:56pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:49pm:

1. It's not my web page bunny: I didn't write the content.

But you fell for it hook, line and sinker and posted it here didn't you.

Not only that - you wrote with it:
Given that I saw a report from a NASA research unit today that stated just the opposite (Co2 and Nitrogen, I believe) act together to reflect incoming solar radiation out into space. SO reducing the Co2 would, according to that report, actually increase warming..

The NASA report did not say that reducing the Co2 would, according to that report, actually increase warming. Yet you claimed the report said it did!!!

Looks like you are a LIAR after all Greggery.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:49pm:

2. The first few words contained a link to the NASA report: that is the important piece of information that was being referred to. Everybody else got that except you.

And then you went and told a lie by saying:

SO reducing the Co2 would, according to that report, actually increase warming..

LIAR
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:49pm:

3. You just cited wikipedia as a reference - twice!

Yes I did Greggery.

Because you do not know the difference between the troposphere and the thermosphere.
I am trying to help you.

Have you read the links yet and realised how stupid the link you posted was?

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Have a read of this hysterical shite!
Reply #89 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:58pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:51pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2013 at 6:49pm:

That is why when you read something from some nutjob website that doesn't know the difference bewteen the troposphere and the thermosphere - you think it is something worth repeating!!!

Moron.

The report is from NASA.

There's certainly no doubt about who the (ignorant) moron is.

Greggery, you told us:

Given that I saw a report from a NASA research unit today that stated just the opposite (Co2 and Nitrogen, I believe) act together to reflect incoming solar radiation out into space. SO reducing the Co2 would, according to that report, actually increase warming..

Where does the Nasa report say that Greggery.

Please show us or apologise to the forum for telling lies

Back to top

IP Logged