ian wrote on Jun 28
th, 2013 at 6:27pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 28
th, 2013 at 6:03pm:
[
what kind of illogical argument is that??? the list of wrongly executed people iw widely available so go look it up for yourself. But if you are proposing a return to the DP then the issue of wrongly convicted is centre stage. You are jumping all over the place in this argument placing yourself in hopeless knots. You statement that you could not accept wrongful executions MUST mean you oppose the DP since it is impossible to guarantee only the guilty are executed. No model of justice can categorically exclude error and the evidence is plentiful to suggest that the error-rate is quite notable. This is the DP's biggest flaw: that you cannot redress the wrongful execution like you can a wrongful conviction and jail term.
Ok. Show me one wrongly executed person in Australia, just one. Surely you have one example? If as you state the DP has errors then just show one example where a person was wrongly executed when the DP was in place in Australia.
@ ian:
How about you illustrate the differences between those few who (may) have been incorrectly sentenced/executed and those numerous convicted offenders who have been released on parole and have gone on to re-offend? Prior to DNA testing is a bit difficult, so we'll stick with the DNA convictions, eh?
The family of Jill Meagher are awaiting with bated breath.
How about the death penalty when there are no questions to be answered - guilty as charged and incontrovertible evidence?
What happens, these days, if you own a dog that bites?
Funny, innit, these days the gangs'll take a risk about poppin' a cap in yo' ass - but the Law must be seen to be above reproach.
And ain't it!