greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 1
st, 2013 at 1:46pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1
st, 2013 at 1:36pm:
Granted the softer member of our society who embrace a the group hug philosophy dealing with scumbags need to explain everything in extreme emotional terms, but it is nothing more that a legal process.
This is where your stupidity really shines through.
In your little mind there are two options: capital punishment, or group hugs. Your narrow-minded ignorance can not even imagine that there may be any alternatives in between.
Don't be too hard on yourself though: many advocates for state-sanctioned killing fall into the same trap.
As for myself, I don't need any tissues: I'm not shedding a tear over
any "scumbag".
I'm opposed to premeditated state-sanctioned killing as a punishment. I'm not opposed to punishing criminals. See if you can spot the difference.
Never said there were only two options, so no need to lie to support your argument; just been reading your endless emotive arguments against tapping the deserving scumbag na d concluded you only hand two options. You're the one with the let 'em live at all costs agenda and sadly you are well supported by a soft c0ck judiciary.
I oppose filth being allow to live one day longer than is necessary, and I have not one ounce of hate toward them, I just prefer to know they ain't walkin free because of some sh1t head manipulating our weak laws to get them out.
Try a less emotive argument about how your lot is about ensuring that scumbags will never breath free air and never go on to commit more crimes because they weren't dealt with properly in the first place and then we might have a decent judicial system.