Peter:
Quote:The justice system is not about vengeance or "closure" for the victim's family.
Good grief, you really are out of touch with modern trends, Peter.
'Victim Impact Statements' have been a feature of our criminal courts for quite some years now. It's suppose to help give some measure of closure and catharsis for the families of victims of brutal murders and suchlike.
And needless to say, 'vengeance' is still very much a valid part of today's concept of jurisprudence. Punishment is still thought to be a reasonable response to those who commit crimes upon the individual and society in general.
Peter:
Quote:No nation that practises judicial murder is truly civilised.
Oh come on! You got that out of a Fortune Cookie didn't you? I got mine out of one of those pull-the-ends firecrackers at a party not so long ago.
Your use of the term 'murder' in this context does nothing but demonstrate that being on shaky ground you need to employ the sort of language that will appeal to the
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder crowd up in the peanut gallery.
What do you say about 'military murder'? Used to throw red paint at our soldiers returning from Vietnam, did you?
Peter:
Quote:Every time there is a particularly nasty killing, the "hang 'em high" mob crawl out of their holes to vent their blood lust.
Is aboriginal 'payback' okay with you? Not a problem in THEIR case ... ?