Kat wrote on Jul 1
st, 2013 at 11:01am:
I started working at 16.
Back then, most of us did.
But that was back when the jobs were everywhere (1973/74).
Perhaps the other strand - the (chorus of clear clarion calls) Gender War had something to do with it - add 40% more workers and hey, presto - automatic unemployment....
Throw in a few policies that favour some over others to 'equalise' them - and hey - guess who suffers the most unemployment....
Young Men.......who are also high in the homeless category... and the 'crime' category - well I wonder farken why?
ALSO:- The rise in the Single Mother of Choice lifestyle is a job by another name... it's a living when there is no other. Check the demos on SMBC in low employment vacancy areas...
Just saying - not criticising... but this is a sort of continuation of the 'mum at home' by another name - and is a stark reminder of REALITY! Maybe more 'mums at home'
would free up the market.... maybe even lower housing prices and so on that are currently geared to the mandatory dual income family......
Too many workers - and even here - a very low job opportunity area - there are people with two jobs and many with none... now WTF sort of micro-management is that?
Absolute freedom for all in the work marketplace, meaning you can have five jobs if you can get them, but someone else might have none.
Great work there! And guaranteed to do three things - fragment this country into massive social divides - lead to massive and permanent underclass poverty and serfdom and consequent disempowerment socially, economically and politically (well, I never!) - and also lead inevitably to revolt and civil war.
Ah - life in The Third World Banana Republic.... (kisses off fingers) .....
THE primary cause of revolt and revolution is insult. How much longer can the dual insults of deprivation and the gender war go on before some eruptions occurs?
Hey, dude! Where's My Australia?