Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 15
Send Topic Print
Indonesian Q&A (Read 7439 times)
BlOoDy RiPpEr
Gold Member
*****
Offline


aussie-patriot.com

Posts: 2475
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #15 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 9:59am
 
Peter Freedman wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 9:39am:
salad in wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 9:00am:
Peter Freedman wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 5:16am:
Fascinating program last night providing a rare insight into the thinking of some of our nearest neighbours.

Most important was a blunt statement by an adviser to the Indonesian Deputy President that they will never accept asylum seeker boats turned back from Australia.

Looks like one of Abbott's principal election policies has developed a serious leak and is sinking fast.

What now, Tony?


Can we have a say on some of Indonesia's policies? How 'bout they run their 2013/2014 budget by us for final approval? What about their defence policy? Social security may need some scrutiny as well.


Indonesia isn't dictating Australian policy. They will simply refuse to accept boats back, that's their policy.

So come on, what's Abbott going to do now?

Then it will be up to the United Nations to act against Indonesia. I'm sure the United nations might have a problem with Indonesia refusing to allow their own boats to come back to port.
Back to top
 

host of the aussie-patriot.com site
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26509
Australia
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #16 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:05am
 
BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 9:59am:
Peter Freedman wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 9:39am:
salad in wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 9:00am:
Peter Freedman wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 5:16am:
Fascinating program last night providing a rare insight into the thinking of some of our nearest neighbours.

Most important was a blunt statement by an adviser to the Indonesian Deputy President that they will never accept asylum seeker boats turned back from Australia.

Looks like one of Abbott's principal election policies has developed a serious leak and is sinking fast.

What now, Tony?


Can we have a say on some of Indonesia's policies? How 'bout they run their 2013/2014 budget by us for final approval? What about their defence policy? Social security may need some scrutiny as well.


Indonesia isn't dictating Australian policy. They will simply refuse to accept boats back, that's their policy.

So come on, what's Abbott going to do now?

Then it will be up to the United Nations to act against Indonesia. I'm sure the United nations might have a problem with Indonesia refusing to allow their own boats to come back to port.


How are they "their own boats"?

SOB

...
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26509
Australia
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #17 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:07am
 
BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 6:40am:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 6:17am:
BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 5:50am:
I think you will find that's Indonesia's problem after all they are Indonesian vessels.


They arent indonesians on the vessels so they arent really indonesian vessels

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

The crew on these boats are Indonesians and the boats are owned by Indonesians.

To say they are not Indonesians would be to say an Australian Naval Boat with a load of boat people on board is not an Australian Vessel


If the indonesians on the boats are criminals then why would they want them back? Its not like they own the boats. Its not like they are filled with indonesians. Its not like they will be all semantic about it like you - they dont want the criminals or the asylum seekers and the govt doesnt own the boats. Why would they want them?

SOB

...
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #18 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:15am
 
Peter Freedman wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 9:39am:
They will simply refuse to accept boats back, that's their policy.


And it's one they can't keep.

The Australian navy will tow the Muslim fraud-boats back into Indonesian waters.

Next move ~ Indonesia's.

What are they going to do then?

Stamp their feet and refuse to accept Australia's annual dole cheque of millions in 'Foreign Aid'?

Back to the drawing-board, Peter.

Nice try, but no Hero of the Soviet Union medal for you this time.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #19 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:17am
 
Peter Freedman wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 5:32am:
No. When did I say that?

I am saying that an extremely influential person states very clearly Indonesia will never accept boats turned back by Australia.

Would you not agree that puts Abbott's "turn back the boats" policy down the dunny?

Does he have a fall back position?


The Coalition doesn't need a fall back position.
Perhaps if Labor 'had some ticker', they could have the boats towed back just like Rudd stated he would do in 2007.
However, it doesn't matter what Indonesia accepts actually.
These boats won't be towed into Indonesian waters, and never have been in the past, so Indonesian acceptance is irrelevant.
They will only towed to the limit of Indonesian territorial waters, and be released in international waters with enough fuel to make port.
These boats are Indonesian boats, registered and crewed by Indonesians.
They have just left an Indonesian port, so for the Indonesians to say they don't want their boats or crews back is silly.
Perhaps they don't want the smugglers to give names of the Indonesian police and officials who have aided these criminals in their enterprise, who knows.
The US Coast Guard have been towing back boats since the eighties, and have towed back 2000 this year alone quite successfully.
The Sri Lankan navy has also been towing back boats with great success.
You think our naval personnel are happy being an escort service for smugglers.
These professional service people have been boarding pirate vessels in the Gulf and nearby waters for over ten years with great success also.
So they can certainly handle a couple of scumbag criminals on smugglers vessels who are inclined to sabotage the boat they are on.
And what happens to them after they are in Indonesian waters is Indonesia's problem eh.
Back to top
 

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #20 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:17am
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:07am:

If the indonesians on the boats are criminals then why would they want them back? Its not like they own the boats. Its not like they are filled with indonesians. Its not like they will be all semantic about it like you - they dont want the criminals or the asylum seekers and the govt doesnt own the boats. Why would they want them?

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Are you thick or something? The crews are Indonesian and the boats are Indonesian fishing boats originating from Indonesia. The crews are generally not criminals the way you would define it but poor fisherman recruited from remote villages to act as patsies for the organisers. Most of them cant even read or write and many of them are not legally adults. You are right in 1 thing, thier government doesnt really want them back. They have an abundance of poor subsistence fishermen in Indonesia, they are only too willing to let us look after them, educate, clothe and feed them and supply them with a wage far above what they could ever expect from fishing. And then deport them after about 5 years.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
red baron
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10204
Blue Mountains
Gender: male
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #21 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:18am
 
Heres a suggestion, the boats come from Indonesia then they can f.....,g well go back there whether those arseholes like it or not.

They let them come, then they can take them back.

Game over.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #22 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:19am
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:15am:
Peter Freedman wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 9:39am:
They will simply refuse to accept boats back, that's their policy.


And it's one they can't keep.

The Australian navy will tow the Muslim fraud-boats back into Indonesian waters.

Next move ~ Indonesia's.

What are they going to do then?

Stamp their feet and refuse to accept Australia's annual dole cheque of millions in 'Foreign Aid'?

Back to the drawing-board, Peter.

Nice try, but no Hero of the Soviet Union medal for you this time.




Under international law we cant do it. Its just a nonsense gambit by Abbot for the thicko vote.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #23 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:20am
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:05am:
BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 9:59am:
Peter Freedman wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 9:39am:
salad in wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 9:00am:
Peter Freedman wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 5:16am:
Fascinating program last night providing a rare insight into the thinking of some of our nearest neighbours.

Most important was a blunt statement by an adviser to the Indonesian Deputy President that they will never accept asylum seeker boats turned back from Australia.

Looks like one of Abbott's principal election policies has developed a serious leak and is sinking fast.

What now, Tony?


Can we have a say on some of Indonesia's policies? How 'bout they run their 2013/2014 budget by us for final approval? What about their defence policy? Social security may need some scrutiny as well.


Indonesia isn't dictating Australian policy. They will simply refuse to accept boats back, that's their policy.

So come on, what's Abbott going to do now?

Then it will be up to the United Nations to act against Indonesia. I'm sure the United nations might have a problem with Indonesia refusing to allow their own boats to come back to port.


How are they "their own boats"?

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg


Indonesian criminal crew, Indonesian registered boats, Indonesian fuel, just left an Indonesian port.
That's Indonesian enough eh. Smiley
Back to top
 

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.
 
IP Logged
 
chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #24 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:24am
 
ian wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:19am:
Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:15am:
Peter Freedman wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 9:39am:
They will simply refuse to accept boats back, that's their policy.


And it's one they can't keep.

The Australian navy will tow the Muslim fraud-boats back into Indonesian waters.

Next move ~ Indonesia's.

What are they going to do then?

Stamp their feet and refuse to accept Australia's annual dole cheque of millions in 'Foreign Aid'?

Back to the drawing-board, Peter.

Nice try, but no Hero of the Soviet Union medal for you this time.




Under international law we cant do it. Its just a nonsense gambit by Abbot for the thicko vote.


And what 'International' law is that?
Is that the one International Rescue work under?
The US Coast Guard tows their  smuggler boats back, the Sri Lankan does the same.
Is this 'International' law from some lefties space cadet manual eh. Grin
Back to top
 

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #25 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:29am
 
Peter Freedman wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 5:16am:
Fascinating program last night providing a rare insight into the thinking of some of our nearest neighbours.

Most important was a blunt statement by an adviser to the Indonesian Deputy President that they will never accept asylum seeker boats turned back from Australia.

Looks like one of Abbott's principal election policies has developed a serious leak and is sinking fast.

What now, Tony?



oh dear here we go again...
I watched it too and yes there was one person quite strident in her attitude no doubt playing to the people.  Well we have a sovereign nation too and since they are Indonesian vessels, crewed by Indonesians, under orders from Indonesian criminals, then in all rationality they must accept their return.

I note the same woman did not mention any conflict/war and just that they would talk to our government about the process.

I note the Indonesian part of the panel was underwhelming in their intelligence and ability to see and consider the problem realistically.

I note Abbott has a much broader and consultative idea for how this would work, than the ALP and it's moronic rusted-ons would have one believe.

I note that corruption is accepted as part of the Indonesian culture and a member of the panel if not embracing that used it and poverty as an excuse for criminal actions.  There lies a cultural difference for sure.  We do not accept that poverty is an excuse for criminality.

As for the non-Australian panel members they seemed to have an even more negative stereotype of Australians than we have of them.  If Indonesian elites harbour these ideas how much more ignorant and misguided are the rest?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #26 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:43am
 
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:24am:
ian wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:19am:
Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:15am:
Peter Freedman wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 9:39am:
They will simply refuse to accept boats back, that's their policy.


And it's one they can't keep.

The Australian navy will tow the Muslim fraud-boats back into Indonesian waters.

Next move ~ Indonesia's.

What are they going to do then?

Stamp their feet and refuse to accept Australia's annual dole cheque of millions in 'Foreign Aid'?

Back to the drawing-board, Peter.

Nice try, but no Hero of the Soviet Union medal for you this time.




Under international law we cant do it. Its just a nonsense gambit by Abbot for the thicko vote.


And what 'International' law is that?
Is that the one International Rescue work under?
The US Coast Guard tows their  smuggler boats back, the Sri Lankan does the same.
Is this 'International' law from some lefties space cadet manual eh. Grin

I have never heard of US coast guard towing back refugee boats. And are you really saying that Sri Lanka should be a role model for Australia? Really? I would be interested to see any information you have on this. Despite which, international maritime law we are required to help any vessel in distress. Theres no way out of this unless we want to cause an international incident, Abbot knows this, he is just blowing hot air. We need a sane acceptable solution to this issue.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 105564
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #27 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:43am
 
But they left out a few questions:

They could have talked about their Muslim extremists.

Also animal cruelty - what did they think about the way the animals were treated?

What about Sharia law?

What about their quite large army?
How big & powerful is it?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #28 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:44am
 
Sharia law only exists in remote provinces in Indonesia, but nowhere do they practise the extreme version you see in the middle east. You have a point about animal cruelty. They are doing a good job on the Muslim extremist front. Their army is geared up for internal policing, they have no reach capability,
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 105564
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Indonesian Q&A
Reply #29 - Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:47am
 
ian wrote on Jul 5th, 2013 at 10:44am:
Sharia law only exists in remote provinces in Indonesia, but nowhere do they practise the extreme version you see in the middle east. You have a point about animal cruelty. They are doing a good job on the Muslim extremist front. Their army is geared up for internal policing, they have no reach capability,



I think Tony Jones was given a tap on the shoulder by ASIO
not to inflame issues too much.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 15
Send Topic Print