corporate_whitey wrote on Jul 6^th, 2013 at 5:11pm:


The only ones who'll fight for the poor, ARE the poor.

No other ba$tard gives a stuff, they're too busy scamming the money that should be going to the poor for themselves.

Or actively encouraging poverty by driving wages & conditions down, and jobs overseas.

Either way, they're lining their pockets at the expense of the poor, and they won't let that change.

Aussies won't be the first to learn that the only way the poor will be heard is with the use of extreme violence, as
the French discovered in 1790, and the Russians in 1917.

No, I'm not advocating it (just to get in before the usual geese launch their attack), but I can see the potential for it.

Maqqa wrote on Jul 6^th, 2013 at 2:23pm:


Redevelop the top end - Liberal scheme - unfunded @ many 100's of Billions

Direct Action -  Liberal scheme - unfunded @ many 100's of Billions

No Mining tax - Liberal scheme - unfunded @ many 100's of Billions

Paid parental leave for the wealthy - Not funded in an acceptable manner for his party or owners.

Quote:



Sorry but who is it that wants to spend spend spend ??????

Option 4 thanks.

Quote:


Really....  it's called visionary booboo...  and yes it will cost a lot of money and take a lot of time but you have to start somewhere to decentralise and stop being fringe dwellers.

As for cost it will take federal, state and private funding to accomplish. Only a moron would try to paint it otherwise..

Quote:


Really?  You got the costings eh?  Or just the ALP propaganda sheet.  Direct action is a more realistic approach and environmental approach to solving environmental problems than a tax or market scheme.  More will be done and it won't mean an additional carbon tax putting the price of everything up and creating a cost of living crisis.

Quote:


LOL, you are a goose...  the states had a mining tax arrangement already this adds to the cost of industry and takes funding from the states and puts it into the hands of the federal government just a big churn.

Quote:


More crap.  Funded by a levy on companies over a specific size.  Not funded by a tax on all Australians and more generous than the ALP policy.

Grendel wrote on Jul 6^th, 2013 at 6:31pm:

Yea, LOL, reality has never been your strong point.

One of the silliest pieces of money wasting  I believe was done by Clover Moore ( Sydney City mayor and Labor do-gooder). She spends of $100,000 on a rainbow painted on the road at Oxford St Sydney. All these gay people start lying on the road and getting pictures taken. So now it's a safety issue. She spends another $100,000 getting it removed. So that's $200,000 flushed down the toilet. It's these people that have caused ordinary Labor voters to turn away from this party.

Quote:


All realistic projections say that it would cost about 10 X more to achieve the same as a fixed price.

See that Tony has gone cheapskate on his green army, spending billions on paying the untrained youth to do local projects and now on a very low wage. If you consider that you only get what you pay for I imagine they won't be getting a lot. This is one of the corner stones of direct action.

One of the others is to plant a few million trees, trees that can't be supplied or maintained?

Direct action is nothing but a joke.