Aussie wrote on Jul 22
nd, 2013 at 3:39pm:
Quote:I think John is, I know I am, talking about local branch members choosing their own candidate (preferably local) to run for election without interference from Head Office.
As with the LNP, more than one candidate (to run for election for a seat) can run. Local Members then by way of plebiscite (vote) determine who the candidate will be. If your emphasis is on the 'head office' aspect, yes I'm sure that happens but there is still the option for many to seek endorsement.
Odd really. In Fisher (Slipper's seat) there were several LNP candidates for endorsement including Brough and a bloke called McGrath, and it was McGrath LNP Head Office wanted. Brough won the vote because he had stacked the LNP Membership of the local (Kawana) LNP Branch. So HQ's man does not always get up.
I associate plebiscite (non-binding vote) with referendum (binding vote) on a national basis where all voters (Australia wide)
are asked to decide a proposal.
At local branch level, yes, you can have any number of nominees from which a candidate has to be selected to run in the election, be it local, state, or federal
And Yes again....
I expect HO to butt-out and leave the selection of a local candidate to the local branch members.
Notwithstanding, of course, evidence of blatant branch stacking.