***FILED***

*phlip you phucker*

I know exactly how she feels... 

Lie 3
(lie  by inference)

For these reasons, it is just plain wrong for anybody in our national political debate to be talking Australia down.

Having already shown our defence is not so robust as he claimed Rudd is already off to a bad start.  He is saying here that any criticism of the government, or its policies, or the economy… is talking Australia down.  He is inferring (as ever) that Abbott and the Opposition are doing just that.  They are not.  When in Opposition, he did the exact same things the Opposition have been doing.  Then, he called it messing with Howard’s mind.  Criticism, dissent and indeed policy amendment, are things done by all parties and even some independents, it is not talking Australia down.

His inference is that Abbott and the Coalition are talking Australia down, and so are not doing their job.  They are the Opposition, and as such they are the major voice Australians have to disagree with the government.  To hold them to account.  It is not wrong for them to do so.  It is not “plain wrong” at all. It is expected and necessary that in our national political debate there are voices of dissent.

Hence Rudd has lied yet again, and proved himself disingenuous and hypocritical at the same time.

It is important that anyone in politics should be an honest broker and provide the population with correct information at all times. Pity that during elections the truth is often hard to discern especially when the rusted-on fail to address reality whilst barracking for their  “team”.  (Now that last para is indeed my opinion.)

You can lump in Lie 4...  with that as well.

But that is different to a daily diatribe of negative politics whose single objective is to cause the Australian people to feel that our national economy and our national security is on the verge of falling apart – if not now, then certainly by next Thursday afternoon.

It ain't daily, not necessarily negative and certainly does not have the single objective he mentions.

skippy. wrote on Jul 12^th, 2013 at 7:31pm:


Care to elaborate and cut the pointless ad hom for a change skip?
no?
how unusual.

Karnal wrote on Jul 12^th, 2013 at 7:59pm:


I've been ignoring you karnal.
I gather you are not wondering why.

Since I'm a LWer and conservative by nature, I doubt I call all members of the Left leftards or think they are all appalling.

interesting no refutation about as usual. 

Grendel wrote on Jul 12^th, 2013 at 7:27pm:








I can't wait to get to 61, just think of the possibilities

Lie 61 (lie by ESP)

Grendel wrote on Jul 12^th, 2013 at 9:25pm:


I couldn’t refute your insight, Grendel. You probably ignore me because I’m not as smart as you.

These leftards are vile.

No refutation yet again...  gee I'm on a roll.
I'll give you guys a few more hours to get things in motion shall I?

4/4...