Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 
Send Topic Print
Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims (Read 46320 times)
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #135 - Dec 6th, 2013 at 12:05pm
 
What has Israel been doing in the region

Does anybody know?

I like to keep up to date with world affairs

Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #136 - Dec 6th, 2013 at 1:46pm
 
Quote:
Why are people worried about 8oo jews being killed? Because they couldn't back off and still wanted to fight?


Because millions of people around the world hold this up an the example for all mankind to follow. If they would admit that Muhammed was just another historical warmongering, raping, pillaging thug, no-one would care. Seeing people try to excuse this behavious is obviously going to raise alarm bells, for the same reason that Nazis promoting Nazism raises alarm bells.

Quote:
Approximately 1.5 million Palestinian civilians have died since 1948,including the victims of the ethnic cleansing campaigns in the west in 1948-50 and in the east since 1967. Civilian deaths have escalated dramatically in recent years since the zionists developed their obsession with the Palestinian birth-rate,and children are often the target.


Wally, why doesn't this alone answer your above question? While Muslims try to justify the execution of 800 Jewish POWs, and similar actions by modern Muslims, it is hard to feel sorry for them when they are victims, and it is equally hard to see any way out for them when the expectation is that rather than ending the slaughter, their goal is to turn the tables and do their own slaughtering on an even bigger scale. By justifying Muhammed's evil deeds, you also justify the same thing from Jews. If the Israeli's applied Muhammed's standards, they would reach an agreement with Palestine (and dredge out one of the many historical ones), wait for some kid to throw a rock, then march in and slaughter every adult male Palestinian and take all the women as sex slaves. We do not criticise Muslims out of a sense of duty to 800 dead Jews, but because the ignorant mentality they display is a real threat to the modern world.

Muslims have long used their own crazy delusionalism as a weapon of fear. It worked well while they were in a position of power, but now it just traps them in endless cycles of violence with each other and whoever else they come into contact with.

Quote:
If they stood up and openly and honestly said "sorry Muhammad, we've had a change of heart, we've decided to opt out of the treaty", then thats an entirely different matter.


Is it not entirely different. It is exactly the same thing. Declaring war obviously ends all treaties. It kind of goes without saying.

Except of course that they did not actually declare or engage in war. Muhammed did.

Are you still under the delusion that Muhammed and his merry band of rapists and pillagers lived up to a standard of no deception in war?

It could equally be argued that Muhammed ended the treaties when he started expelling entire tribes over comparatively trivial incidents and started preaching anti-Jewish propaganda. Would that not equally count as treason?

Whatever the cause of a war, executing the entire adult male population after they surrender and raping all their women is never morally acceptable, even if you leaves you with the inconvenient issue of what else to do with them. Constant attempts by Muslims to defend the indefensible merely demonstrates the incredible moral flexibility and hypocrisy that Islam requires of it's followers.

Quote:
But when you pretend to remain loyal, then enter into negotiations with the enemy behind the muslims back, and then carry out sneak attacks against women and children, then that is a clear act of treason. But please, keep up your flip-flopping in insisting that it isn't - its quite amusing.


Like I said, treason is treason, and I have no objection to Muhammed executing the people who actually engaged in it. What I object to is capturing and killing every adult male after they have surrendered and raping the women. I reject your monolithic entity argument unless you are willing to accept the same argument applied to modern Muslims, who have adopted 7th century Arab tribalism and moral standards as a religion.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #137 - Dec 6th, 2013 at 2:05pm
 
freediver wrote on Dec 6th, 2013 at 1:46pm:
It could equally be argued that Muhammed ended the treaties when he started expelling entire tribes over comparatively trivial incidents


They were not trivial according to Watt, Armstrong and Mubarakpuri (Sealed Nectar) among others - they too were committing acts of war against Muhammad - including an assassination attempt.

freediver wrote on Dec 6th, 2013 at 1:46pm:
started preaching anti-Jewish propaganda.


Such as?

freediver wrote on Dec 6th, 2013 at 1:46pm:
Whatever the cause of a war, executing the entire adult male population after they surrender


Like I keep saying, it is reasonable to accuse them of collective guilt, since at any time any individual had the opportunity to disassociate themselves from the decisions made on behalf of the tribe. The fact that there were only 700 in an entire tribe should be an indication of their unity of mind. It was not a disparate collection of far-flung communities. They chose to stick with the tribe, and therefore the treachery of the tribe.

freediver wrote on Dec 6th, 2013 at 1:46pm:
raping all their women


Roll Eyes Seriously, you have never provided any evidence of this despite repeated requests. Why do you keep spewing this baseless claim and make yourself look silly?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #138 - Dec 6th, 2013 at 3:43pm
 
accurate maps always annoy and expose the Zio-fascist apologists

Always distracting, always lying,

I wonder what they are trying to hide?

Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
wally1
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2055
Gender: male
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #139 - Dec 6th, 2013 at 4:58pm
 
Chimp_Logic wrote on Dec 6th, 2013 at 3:43pm:
accurate maps always annoy and expose the Zio-fascist apologists

Always distracting, always lying,

I wonder what they are trying to hide?



If the jews love America so much, why don't they piss off and build there Zionist state somewhere in America.

Plenty of land there.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18257
Gender: male
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #140 - Dec 6th, 2013 at 5:05pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 4th, 2013 at 7:07pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 4th, 2013 at 5:49pm:
The jews lent Mohammad tools to dig this treanch, the jews did not let the Meccans in, the Meccans went home without a fight.


Lets see what your beloved Sealed Nectar says about these "innocent" jews:

Quote:
In the midst of these difficult circumstances, plottery and intrigues were in fervent action against the Muslims. The chief criminal of Bani Nadir, Huyai, headed for the habitations of Banu Quraiza to incite their chief Ka‘b bin Asad Al Qurazi, who had drawn a pact with the Messenger of Allâh [pbuh] to run to his aid in times of war. Ka‘b, in the beginning resisted all Huyai’s temptation, but Huyai was clever enough to manipulate him, speaking of Quraish and their notables in Al Asyal, as well as Ghatfan and their chieftains entrenched in Uhud, all in one mind, determined to exterminate Muhammad [pbuh] and his followers. He, moreover, promised to stay in Ka‘b’s fort exposing himself to any potential danger in case Quraish and Ghatfan recanted. Thewicked man went on in this manner until he later managed to win Ka‘b to his side and persuade him to break his covenant with the Muslims.[Ibn Hisham 3/337] Banu Quraiza then started to launch war operations against the Muslims especially the secluded garrisons that housed the women and children of the Muslims.

[...]

They... went on providing the idolaters with supplies in token of their support against the Muslims.




Thank you for finally giving the page number, if you include it in future we can check to see what you left out.

From page 197 the bit you left out-
Quote:
Safiya daughter of Abdul Muttalib said-A jew was spotted lurking around our our site,which was vulnerable to any enemy attacks because there were no men to defend it.I informed hassan that i was suspicious of that mans presence near us.He might takes us by surprise now that the messenger of allah and the muslims are too busy to come to our aid.
Why dont you go down and kill him?Hassan answered he would not do it,so i took a bar of wood,went down and bashed the jew to death.
This event had far reaching effects and discouraged the jews from conducting further attacks


There was one jew who was lurking around the site where the muslim women stayed and he was bashed to death because muslims were paranoid he might take them by surprise.

A muslim bashed a jew to death and this discouraged them from conducting further attacks.

Killing POW's is  a war crime today,Mohammad had no problem with chopping the heads off non muslim and hypocrites who were POW's

Enslaving captured women and children is a war crime today, Mohammad sold captured women and children into slavery.

Having sex with captured females is considered a war crime today, there are sahih hadeeth where Mohammad is asked about coitus interruptus with captured women and he said no need to pull out.

Stealing the wealth of the enemy is a war crime today, Mohammad routinely stole the wealth from conquered people,your Allah does not have any problems with stealing the wealth of non muslims as long as he gets his cut.
www.quran.com/8/41

How many muslim countries have ratified the Rome statute  and Geneva conventions or do they say it is unislamic?

Today Islam is not compatible with the Universal declaration of human rights which has not been ratified by many Islamic countries as it violates Islamic law.




Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 6th, 2013 at 5:23pm by Baronvonrort »  

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18257
Gender: male
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #141 - Dec 6th, 2013 at 5:16pm
 
Chimp_Logic wrote on Dec 6th, 2013 at 3:43pm:
accurate maps always annoy and expose the Zio-fascist apologists

Always distracting, always lying,

I wonder what they are trying to hide?



Your map is not accurate, it is propaganda.

Egypt had control of Gaza from around 1948 to the 1967 six day war when they lost it to Israel, your propaganda says it was palestinian land when Egypt had control of it.
Israel gave Gaza back.

Jordan had control of The West Bank in the same time period, they lost it to Israel in the 1967 six day war, your propaganda shows it as Palestinian land when Jordan had control of it.

Today Israel has built a wall, try google for Israeli wall then click on images.
Have a look at  the pictures of the Palestinian side of the wall and see if it matches the propaganda in your map.

I think the creation of Israel and Pakistan was a mistake,i think Israel has just as much right to exist as Pakistan, both have not signed the NPT and have nuclear weapons,more Pakistani's have died from Islamic terror in the last decade in Pakistan than troops from the coalition of the willing in Iraq and Afghanstan yet nobody says anything about muslims killing muslims.

Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
wally1
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2055
Gender: male
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #142 - Dec 6th, 2013 at 5:48pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 6th, 2013 at 5:05pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 4th, 2013 at 7:07pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 4th, 2013 at 5:49pm:
The jews lent Mohammad tools to dig this treanch, the jews did not let the Meccans in, the Meccans went home without a fight.


Lets see what your beloved Sealed Nectar says about these "innocent" jews:

Quote:
In the midst of these difficult circumstances, plottery and intrigues were in fervent action against the Muslims. The chief criminal of Bani Nadir, Huyai, headed for the habitations of Banu Quraiza to incite their chief Ka‘b bin Asad Al Qurazi, who had drawn a pact with the Messenger of Allâh [pbuh] to run to his aid in times of war. Ka‘b, in the beginning resisted all Huyai’s temptation, but Huyai was clever enough to manipulate him, speaking of Quraish and their notables in Al Asyal, as well as Ghatfan and their chieftains entrenched in Uhud, all in one mind, determined to exterminate Muhammad [pbuh] and his followers. He, moreover, promised to stay in Ka‘b’s fort exposing himself to any potential danger in case Quraish and Ghatfan recanted. Thewicked man went on in this manner until he later managed to win Ka‘b to his side and persuade him to break his covenant with the Muslims.[Ibn Hisham 3/337] Banu Quraiza then started to launch war operations against the Muslims especially the secluded garrisons that housed the women and children of the Muslims.

[...]

They... went on providing the idolaters with supplies in token of their support against the Muslims.




Thank you for finally giving the page number, if you include it in future we can check to see what you left out.

From page 197 the bit you left out-
Quote:
Safiya daughter of Abdul Muttalib said-A jew was spotted lurking around our our site,which was vulnerable to any enemy attacks because there were no men to defend it.I informed hassan that i was suspicious of that mans presence near us.He might takes us by surprise now that the messenger of allah and the muslims are too busy to come to our aid.
Why dont you go down and kill him?Hassan answered he would not do it,so i took a bar of wood,went down and bashed the jew to death.
This event had far reaching effects and discouraged the jews from conducting further attacks


There was one jew who was lurking around the site where the muslim women stayed and he was bashed to death because muslims were paranoid he might take them by surprise.

A muslim bashed a jew to death and this discouraged them from conducting further attacks.

Killing POW's is  a war crime today,Mohammad had no problem with chopping the heads off non muslim and hypocrites who were POW's

Enslaving captured women and children is a war crime today, Mohammad sold captured women and children into slavery.

Having sex with captured females is considered a war crime today, there are sahih hadeeth where Mohammad is asked about coitus interruptus with captured women and he said no need to pull out.

Stealing the wealth of the enemy is a war crime today, Mohammad routinely stole the wealth from conquered people,your Allah does not have any problems with stealing the wealth of non muslims as long as he gets his cut.
www.quran.com/8/41

How many muslim countries have ratified the Rome statute  and Geneva conventions or do they say it is unislamic?

Today Islam is not compatible with the Universal declaration of human rights which has not been ratified by many Islamic countries as it violates Islamic law.







Well that taught the jew not to perve on women, or potentially attack women when there were no men  around.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #143 - Dec 6th, 2013 at 6:40pm
 
That one jew lurking around is obviously not the "war operation
s
" (plural) that is being referred to. That was just the incident that prompted the jews to stop.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
wally1
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2055
Gender: male
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #144 - Dec 6th, 2013 at 7:00pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 6th, 2013 at 6:40pm:
That one jew lurking around is obviously not the "war operation
s
" (plural) that is being referred to. That was just the incident that prompted the jews to stop.


Just proves that the jews wouldn't leave the muslims alone and when the jew go his head kicked in they stopped harassing the muslims.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #145 - Dec 7th, 2013 at 1:47pm
 
Quote:
Like I keep saying, it is reasonable to accuse them of collective guilt


So Islam supports collective punishment?

Quote:
since at any time any individual had the opportunity to disassociate themselves from the decisions made on behalf of the tribe


The decision that was made was to not attack Muslims and in fact to support them. Why is there anny need to disassociate themselves from that?

Quote:
The fact that there were only 700 in an entire tribe should be an indication of their unity of mind.


Only if your religion requires you to deliberately delude yourself. And it is simply not true that there were only 700. There were supposedly 600 to 900 able bodied adult men who were executed. How many tribes do you know of that consist only of adult men?

Quote:
Seriously, you have never provided any evidence of this despite repeated requests.


That's what concubine means Gandalf. Muhammed himself took one of the wives as his concubine after chopping her husband's head off. Are you suggesting some kind of fairy tale where they fell in love and got married? I do not have to "prove" anything. Islamic texts openly admit it.

Quote:
They were not trivial according to Watt, Armstrong and Mubarakpuri (Sealed Nectar) among others - they too were committing acts of war against Muhammad - including an assassination attempt.


Muhammed was paranoid about an assassination attempt. That does not mean there actually was one. He merely invented it as yet another excuse to persecute Jews and reneg on his treaty with them.

Does the sealed nectar present new evidence that was not previously available?

Quote:
Well that taught the jew not to perve on women, or potentially attack women when there were no men  around.


Yes, Jews must be beaten to death in order to prevent them from comitting 'potential' crimes.

Quote:
Such as?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banu_Qaynuqa

Muhammad then approached the Banu Qaynuqa, gathering them in the market place and addressing them as follows,

“O Jews, beware lest God bring on you the like of the retribution which he brought on Quraysh. Accept Islam, for you know that I am a prophet sent by God. You will find this in your scriptures and in God's covenant with you.[15]”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_antisemitism

"The Day of Judgement will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews , when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O Abdullah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (a certain kind of tree) would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews."

Paragraph 37 has it that 'To the Jews their own expenses and to the Muslims theirs. They shall help one another in the event of any attack on the people covered by this document. There shall be sincere friendship, exchange of good counsel, fair conduct and no treachery between them.'.[22] The three local Jewish tribes were the Banu Nadir, the Banu Qurayza, and the Banu Qaynuqa. While Mohammad clearly had no prejudice against them, and appears to have regarded his own message as substantially the same as that received by Jews on Sinai,[23] tribal politics, and Mohammad's deep frustration at Jewish refusals to accept his prophethood,[24] quickly led to a break with all three. Unfortunate linguistic misunderstandings may also have given the impression, evidenced in the Quran, that the Jewish community was publicly humiliating Mohammad.[25] The Banu Qaynuqa were expelled from Medina in 624, Fred Donner argues that Muhammad turned against the Qaynuqa because as artisans and traders, the latter were in close contact with Meccan merchants.[26] Weinsinck views the episodes cited by the Muslim historians used to justify their expulsion; such as a Jewish goldsmith humiliating a Muslim woman, as having no more than anecdotal value. He writes that the Jews had assumed a contentious attitude towards Muhammad, and as a group possessing substantial independent power, they posed a great danger. Wensinck thus concludes that Muhammad, strengthened by the victory at Badr, soon resolved to eliminate the Jewish opposition to himself.[27] Norman Stillman also believes that Muhammad decided to move against the Jews of Medina after being strengthened in the wake of the Battle of Badr.[28] In 625, the Banu Nadir was evicted from Medina and subsequently all of their men were killed and women and children placed into bondage following the events of the Battle of the Trench. All though the Banu Qurayza never took up arms against Mohammad or the Muslims their city was sacked in 627 and according to several Hadiths after they had surrendered all of the men were killed and the children and women forced into slavery

The hadith (recordings of deeds and sayings attributed to Muhammad) use both the terms Banu Israil and Yahud in relation to Jews, the latter term becoming ever more frequent and appearing mostly in negative context. According to Norman Stillman:
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #146 - Dec 7th, 2013 at 1:47pm
 
    Jews in Medina are singled out as "men whose malice and enmity was aimed at the Apostle of God". The Yahūd in this literature appear not only as malicious, but also deceitful, cowardly and totally lacking resolve. However, they have none of the demonic qualities attributed to them in mediaeval Christian literature, neither is there anything comparable to the overwhelming preoccupation with Jews and Judaism (except perhaps in the narratives on Muhammad's encounters with Medinan Jewry) in Muslim traditional literature. Except for a few notable exceptions... the Jews in the Sira and the Maghazi are even heroic villains. Their ignominy stands in marked contrast to Muslim heroism, and in general, conforms to the Quranic image of "wretchedness and baseness stamped upon them"[11]

He said:
“      

"The Day of Judgement will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews , when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O Abdullah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (a certain kind of tree) would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews." (related by al-Bukhari and Muslim).Sahih Muslim, 41:6985, see also Sahih Muslim, 41:6981, Sahih Muslim, 41:6982, Sahih Muslim, 41:6983, Sahih Muslim, 41:6984, Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:56:791,(Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:177)
     ”

This hadith has been quoted countless times, and it has become a part of the charter of Hamas.[55]

According to Schweitzer and Perry, the hadith are "even more scathing (than the Quran) in attacking the Jews":

    They are debased, cursed, anathematized forever by God and so can never repent and be forgiven; they are cheats and traitors; defiant and stubborn; they killed the prophets; they are liars who falsify scripture and take bribes; as infidels they are ritually unclean, a foul odor emanating from them – such is the image of the Jew in classical Islam, degraded and malevolent.[8]

Quran

The words "humility" and "humiliation" occur frequently in the Quran and later Muslim literature in relation to Jews. According to Lewis, "This, in Islamic view, is their just punishment for their past rebelliousness, and is manifested in their present impotence between the mighty powers of Christendom and Islam." The standard Quranic reference to Jews is verse [Quran 2:61]: "And remember ye said: "O Moses! we cannot endure one kind of food (always); so beseech thy Lord for us to produce for us of what the earth groweth, -its pot-herbs, and cucumbers, Itsgarlic, lentils, and onions." He said: "Will ye exchange the better for the worse? Go ye down to any town, and ye shall find what ye want!" They were covered with humiliation and misery; they drew on themselves the wrath of Allah. This because they went on rejecting the Signs of Allah and slaying His Messengers without just cause. This because they rebelled and went on transgressing."[56]

Two verses later we read: "And remember, Children of Israel, when We made a covenant with you and raised Mount Sinai before you saying, "Hold tightly to what We have revealed to you and keep it in mind so that you may guard against evil." But then you turned away, and if it had not been for Allah's grace and merecy, you surely would have been among the lost. And you know those among who sinned on the Sabbath. We said to them, "You will be transformed into despised apes." So we used them as a warning to their people and to the following generations, as well as a lesson for the Allah-fearing."(Quran [Quran 2:63]) The accusation that Jews will ultimately be transformed into apes and pigs is traditionally understood literally[citation needed] and is derived from such Quranic and other early Muslim sources.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #147 - Dec 7th, 2013 at 1:47pm
 
The Quran associates Jews above all with rejection of God's prophets including Jesus and Muhammad, thus explaining their resistance to him personally. (Cf. Surah 2:87–91; 5:59, 61, 70, and 82.) It states that they are, together with outright idolators, the worst and most inveterate enemies of Islam, and thus will not only suffer eternally in Hell but in this world will be the most degraded of the Peoples of the Book, below even Christians, everywhere. (Cf. Surah 5:82; 3:54–56.) It also asserts that Jews believe that they are the sole children of God (Surah 5:18), and that only they will achieve salvation (Surah 2:111). According to the Quran, Jews blasphemously claim that Ezra is the son of God, as Christians claim Jesus is, (Surah 9:30) and that God's hand is fettered (Surah 5:64 – i.e., that they can freely defy God). Some of those who are Jews,[11] "pervert words from their meanings", (Surah 4:44), and because they have committed wrongdoing, God has "forbidden some good things that were previously permitted them", thus explaining Jewish commandments regarding food, Sabbath restrictions on work, and other rulings as a punishment from God (Surah 4:160). They listen for the sake of mendacity (Surah 5:41), twisting the truth, and practice forbidden usury, and therefore they will receive "a painful doom" (Surah 4:161).[11] The Quran gives credence to the Christian claim of Jews scheming against Jesus, "...but God also schemed, and God is the best of schemers"(Surah 3:54). In the Muslim view, the crucifixion of Jesus was an illusion, and thus the supposed Jewish plots against him ended in complete failure.[47] In numerous verses (Surah 3:63, 71; 4:46, 160–161; 5:41–44, 63–64, 82; 6:92)[48] the Quran accuses Jews of deliberately obscuring and perverting scripture.[43]
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #148 - Dec 7th, 2013 at 7:40pm
 
freediver wrote on Dec 7th, 2013 at 1:47pm:
So Islam supports collective punishment?


No. I'm not going over this again.

freediver wrote on Dec 7th, 2013 at 1:47pm:
Only if your religion requires you to deliberately delude yourself. And it is simply not true that there were only 700. There were supposedly 600 to 900 able bodied adult men who were executed. How many tribes do you know of that consist only of adult men?


600-900 able bodied men is extremely small - even in 7th century Arabia.

freediver wrote on Dec 7th, 2013 at 1:47pm:
That's what concubine means Gandalf.


yes FD of course, concubine = "rape"  Roll Eyes And please provide a single piece of evidence that every single woman was raped.

Does the Quran or the hadith provide specific instructions for women to be raped and taken as sex slaves upon capture? Surely if its such an "islamic" practice, there must be some instruction from the text no?

freediver wrote on Dec 7th, 2013 at 1:47pm:
“O Jews, beware lest God bring on you the like of the retribution which he brought on Quraysh. Accept Islam, for you know that I am a prophet sent by God. You will find this in your scriptures and in God's covenant with you.[15]”


= "anti-Jewish propaganda" - of course  Tongue

freediver wrote on Dec 7th, 2013 at 1:47pm:
Quran


From the same wiki article you (selectively) quoted:

Quote:
According to Bernard Lewis, there is nothing in Muslim theology (with a single exception) that can be considered refutations of Judaism or ferocious anti-Jewish diatribes.[32] Lewis and Chanes suggest that, for a variety of reasons, Muslims were not antisemitic for the most part. The Quran, like Judaism, orders Muslims to profess strict monotheism. It also rejects the stories of Jewish deicide as a blasphemous absurdity, and other similar stories in the Gospels play no part in the Muslim educational system The Quran does not present itself as a fulfillment of the Hebrew Bible but rather a restoration of its original message – thus, no clash of interpretations between Judaism and Islam can arise.


When the Quran speaks of the 'children of Israel', it is literally speaking about people who are specifically identified as muslims. With this in mind, quranic criticisms of jews is no worse and no different to criticisms contained within the old testament - ie God demonstrating and warning "his" people where they have strayed before, and the consequences of that. So it doesn't make sense at all to say the quran is "anti-semitic".
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Jews always to blame for conflict, never Muslims
Reply #149 - Dec 7th, 2013 at 8:48pm
 
Quote:
No. I'm not going over this again.


It is collective punishment, whether you like it or not. It requires you to believe in absurd fantasies about 800 adult men not being able to think and act for themselves. I agree you should not go aver it again, because it is pure delusion.

Quote:
Does the Quran or the hadith provide specific instructions for women to be raped and taken as sex slaves upon capture?


There are plenty of references to taken women captured in battle. For some reason Muslim men didn't need instructions on how to rape.

Quote:
Surely if its such an "islamic" practice, there must be some instruction from the text no?


In Islam, everything is permitted unless it is specifically forbidden. There is no punishment for spousal rape or the rape of concubines. Islam rejects the idea that these women must consent.

Quote:
When the Quran speaks of the 'children of Israel', it is literally speaking about people who are specifically identified as muslims. With this in mind, quranic criticisms of jews is no worse and no different to criticisms contained within the old testament - ie God demonstrating and warning "his" people where they have strayed before, and the consequences of that. So it doesn't make sense at all to say the quran is "anti-semitic".


That makes no sense at all. And there is nothing in the old testament about hunting down and slaughtering every last Jew.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 
Send Topic Print