Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Moral voters (Read 2174 times)
alp4eva
Junior Member
**
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88
Gender: female
Re: Moral voters
Reply #30 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:00pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:53pm:
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:49pm:
My problem is with who started the boats because that was the precursor to every dollar wasted and every person dead.

That responsibility lies with who authorised the relaxation of the previous working policies. Unless that is recognised, there is every chance that history will repeat itself.


That'd be the voters of Australia who elected Rudd's ALP in 2007. 

Whatever......it is now over.....the boats will stop, and kids will not drown.

What is your problem with that?

What's your problem with accepting responsibility for bad policy?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Moral voters
Reply #31 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:06pm
 
Where did these warnings come from? It's already on the public record that the Labor Government was repeatedly warned by the Unions about the dangers of blow ins. Garrett was the one who had to carry the can, because he was the minister and the media wanted blood.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Online


OzPolitic

Posts: 38727
Gender: male
Re: Moral voters
Reply #32 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:07pm
 
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:00pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:53pm:
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:49pm:
My problem is with who started the boats because that was the precursor to every dollar wasted and every person dead.

That responsibility lies with who authorised the relaxation of the previous working policies. Unless that is recognised, there is every chance that history will repeat itself.


That'd be the voters of Australia who elected Rudd's ALP in 2007. 

Whatever......it is now over.....the boats will stop, and kids will not drown.

What is your problem with that?

What's your problem with accepting responsibility for bad policy?


Oh, okay, if that is all you want.  Yep, I voted ALP in  2007 and so did the vast majority of Australians.  But the goal posts move in this refugee issue, and it took a pragmatic Rudd to adjust his game to match.

Now, what is your problem with that?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Moral voters
Reply #33 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:08pm
 
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:00pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:53pm:
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:49pm:
My problem is with who started the boats because that was the precursor to every dollar wasted and every person dead.

That responsibility lies with who authorised the relaxation of the previous working policies. Unless that is recognised, there is every chance that history will repeat itself.


That'd be the voters of Australia who elected Rudd's ALP in 2007. 

Whatever......it is now over.....the boats will stop, and kids will not drown.

What is your problem with that?

What's your problem with accepting responsibility for bad policy?


The reality is that Howard's solution would not have worked forever.

Further a majority of Australians wanted asylum seekers processed onshore. Rudd was given a clear mandate to stop offshore processing.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
alp4eva
Junior Member
**
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88
Gender: female
Re: Moral voters
Reply #34 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:10pm
 
ALP immigration minister 2008
Quote:
Labor committed to abolishing the Pacific Solution and this was one the first things the Rudd Labor Government did on taking office.  It was also one of my greatest pleasures in politics.  Neither humane nor fair, the Pacific Solution was also ineffective and wasteful.

At massive cost to the Australian taxpayer – I am advised that the Department of Immigration and Citizenship expended $309.8 million between September 2001 and 29 February 2008 to run the Nauru and Manus Offshore Processing Centres (OPCs) – the Howard government sought to outsource our international protection obligations to less developed countries when we should have been shouldering them ourselves…

The Pacific Solution was not about maintaining integrity or public confidence in Australia’s arrangements.  It was about the cynical politics of punishing refugees for domestic political purposes.


That $309M over 7 years looks like a bargain now, doesn't it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: Moral voters
Reply #35 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:11pm
 
MOTR wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:08pm:
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:00pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:53pm:
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:49pm:
My problem is with who started the boats because that was the precursor to every dollar wasted and every person dead.

That responsibility lies with who authorised the relaxation of the previous working policies. Unless that is recognised, there is every chance that history will repeat itself.


That'd be the voters of Australia who elected Rudd's ALP in 2007. 

Whatever......it is now over.....the boats will stop, and kids will not drown.

What is your problem with that?

What's your problem with accepting responsibility for bad policy?


The reality is that Howard's solution would not have worked forever.


But it was working

Last but not least - a policy not lasting forever is way better than a Labor policy not working EVER!!!
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: Moral voters
Reply #36 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:13pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:07pm:
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:00pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:53pm:
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:49pm:
My problem is with who started the boats because that was the precursor to every dollar wasted and every person dead.

That responsibility lies with who authorised the relaxation of the previous working policies. Unless that is recognised, there is every chance that history will repeat itself.


That'd be the voters of Australia who elected Rudd's ALP in 2007. 

Whatever......it is now over.....the boats will stop, and kids will not drown.

What is your problem with that?

What's your problem with accepting responsibility for bad policy?


Oh, okay, if that is all you want.  Yep, I voted ALP in  2007 and so did the vast majority of Australians.  But the goal posts move in this refugee issue, and it took a pragmatic Rudd to adjust his game to match.

Now, what is your problem with that?


Rudd won 53/47 - not a "vast majority" even by your limited imagination

Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Moral voters
Reply #37 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:14pm
 
Maqqa wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:11pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:08pm:
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:00pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:53pm:
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:49pm:
My problem is with who started the boats because that was the precursor to every dollar wasted and every person dead.

That responsibility lies with who authorised the relaxation of the previous working policies. Unless that is recognised, there is every chance that history will repeat itself.


That'd be the voters of Australia who elected Rudd's ALP in 2007. 

Whatever......it is now over.....the boats will stop, and kids will not drown.

What is your problem with that?

What's your problem with accepting responsibility for bad policy?


The reality is that Howard's solution would not have worked forever.


But it was working

Last but not least - a policy not lasting forever is way better than a Labor policy not working EVER!!!


And circumstances change.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male
Re: Moral voters
Reply #38 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:15pm
 
adelcrow wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 11:21am:
John Smith wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 11:09am:
there's going to be a of lot skid marks in the righties underwear over the next few days ....  Grin Grin Grin, they are just crapping themselves now.



Every time Kevin O'Heaven trumps Tony the neo cons go into fits of panic  Grin
Its hilarious to watch  Grin


Not as hilarious as watching those who were slagging KRudd not too long ago now believe he has the election in the bag because he finally got one policy right, and that hasn't been implemented as yet.
Back to top
 

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Online


OzPolitic

Posts: 38727
Gender: male
Re: Moral voters
Reply #39 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:16pm
 
Maqqa wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:11pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:08pm:
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:00pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:53pm:
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:49pm:
My problem is with who started the boats because that was the precursor to every dollar wasted and every person dead.

That responsibility lies with who authorised the relaxation of the previous working policies. Unless that is recognised, there is every chance that history will repeat itself.


That'd be the voters of Australia who elected Rudd's ALP in 2007. 

Whatever......it is now over.....the boats will stop, and kids will not drown.

What is your problem with that?

What's your problem with accepting responsibility for bad policy?


The reality is that Howard's solution would not have worked forever.


But it was working

Last but not least - a policy not lasting forever is way better than a Labor policy not working EVER!!!


Ancient history.  Live in the past if you want but 'tis time to move on, and pragmatic Rudd is doing that.  What is your problem with Rudd's proposal?  Why won't it 'stop the boats?'
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Online


OzPolitic

Posts: 38727
Gender: male
Re: Moral voters
Reply #40 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:18pm
 
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:15pm:
adelcrow wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 11:21am:
John Smith wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 11:09am:
there's going to be a of lot skid marks in the righties underwear over the next few days ....  Grin Grin Grin, they are just crapping themselves now.



Every time Kevin O'Heaven trumps Tony the neo cons go into fits of panic  Grin
Its hilarious to watch  Grin


Not as hilarious as watching those who were slagging KRudd not too long ago now believe he has the election in the bag because he finally got one policy right, and that hasn't been implemented as yet.


Where have you been living in the last 24 hours?  The deal is done.  All boaties go to Manus Paradise as of yesterday.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: Moral voters
Reply #41 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:25pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:18pm:
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:15pm:
adelcrow wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 11:21am:
John Smith wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 11:09am:
there's going to be a of lot skid marks in the righties underwear over the next few days ....  Grin Grin Grin, they are just crapping themselves now.



Every time Kevin O'Heaven trumps Tony the neo cons go into fits of panic  Grin
Its hilarious to watch  Grin


Not as hilarious as watching those who were slagging KRudd not too long ago now believe he has the election in the bag because he finally got one policy right, and that hasn't been implemented as yet.


Where have you been living in the last 24 hours?  The deal is done.  All boaties go to Manus Paradise as of yesterday.


I remember Gillard signing the Malaysian Solution deal as well - 50,000 illegals later
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: Moral voters
Reply #42 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:26pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:16pm:
Maqqa wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:11pm:
MOTR wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:08pm:
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:00pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:53pm:
alp4eva wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 2:49pm:
My problem is with who started the boats because that was the precursor to every dollar wasted and every person dead.

That responsibility lies with who authorised the relaxation of the previous working policies. Unless that is recognised, there is every chance that history will repeat itself.


That'd be the voters of Australia who elected Rudd's ALP in 2007. 

Whatever......it is now over.....the boats will stop, and kids will not drown.

What is your problem with that?

What's your problem with accepting responsibility for bad policy?


The reality is that Howard's solution would not have worked forever.


But it was working

Last but not least - a policy not lasting forever is way better than a Labor policy not working EVER!!!


Ancient history.  Live in the past if you want but 'tis time to move on, and pragmatic Rudd is doing that.  What is your problem with Rudd's proposal?  Why won't it 'stop the boats?'


If the past is ancient history and we should adopt the  "time to move on" then you have no basis for your assessments at all
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male
Re: Moral voters
Reply #43 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:31pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:18pm:
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:15pm:
adelcrow wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 11:21am:
John Smith wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 11:09am:
there's going to be a of lot skid marks in the righties underwear over the next few days ....  Grin Grin Grin, they are just crapping themselves now.



Every time Kevin O'Heaven trumps Tony the neo cons go into fits of panic  Grin
Its hilarious to watch  Grin


Not as hilarious as watching those who were slagging KRudd not too long ago now believe he has the election in the bag because he finally got one policy right, and that hasn't been implemented as yet.


Where have you been living in the last 24 hours?  The deal is done.  All boaties go to Manus Paradise as of yesterday.


And how many have arrived?
Mmmmmm, none.
Apart from Rudd speaking, and paper being signed, lefties wailing, what else has occurred.
Mmmmmm, nothing.
As I said, not yet implemented.
Labors policy is yet to be tested.
Back to top
 

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95806
Gender: male
Re: Moral voters
Reply #44 - Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:33pm
 
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 3:15pm:
adelcrow wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 11:21am:
John Smith wrote on Jul 20th, 2013 at 11:09am:
there's going to be a of lot skid marks in the righties underwear over the next few days ....  Grin Grin Grin, they are just crapping themselves now.



Every time Kevin O'Heaven trumps Tony the neo cons go into fits of panic  Grin
Its hilarious to watch  Grin


Not as hilarious as watching those who were slagging KRudd not too long ago now believe he has the election in the bag because he finally got one policy right, and that hasn't been implemented as yet.


I’m that guy. That’s my prediction, and I’m sticking with it until I hear a big positive for Abbott.

To me, it looks like Rudd’s changed big time. He’s more focussed, direct and swifter than before. Much of his Ruddbot, bureaucratic-speak has been replaced with clear, precise talking.

And much of it’s making sense.

His announcement yesterday was all these things, and it captured some of the bigger issues in this problem - we’re in the middle of one of the biggest migration booms in human history. Something needs to be done now, and it has.

Rudd looks like he’s fighting for his life, and this is why I’m calling the election in his favour.

Voters want a fighter, and they love a comeback story. Rudd, remember, is still the underdog.

He has, in my humble view, got this one in the bag.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print