____ wrote on Jul 21
st, 2013 at 4:44pm:
Karnal wrote on Jul 21
st, 2013 at 4:18pm:
____ wrote on Jul 21
st, 2013 at 2:43pm:
Karnal wrote on Jul 21
st, 2013 at 2:24pm:
Hey, Greens, how many refugees do they have in Texas, Arizona, New Maxico, Florida and California?
About ten million?
What’s the death penalty rate there?
How many of our boat refugees are australia planning on dumping over there?
Try keeping up.
How many are the UNHCR dumping there?
What does it mean when a person answer your question with another question?
Answer:
It's often a "fogging" technique to confound the questioner and buy time before responding to the original question. A classic self-assertiveness strategy; useful if used sparingly when being, for example, unduly pressured to answer a possibly intrusive or bullying question.
Do you think answering a question with a question is a good tactic?
Just wondering, Greens. I thought you might know.
To answer your question, Afghani, Iranian and Sri Lankan boat refugees are Afghani, Iranian and Sri Lankan. This might sound ever so cruel, but they don’t have any Australian residency status because they paid someone in Indonesia to drop them off here.
They now become our refugees when they apply to come and the UNHCR gives us the nod. We fly them in, show them around, and try to make them feel at home.
Really mean, I know, but it’s either that or pul their bodies out of the Timor Sea.
What does the death penalty even have to do with this? Are you saying Australia is violating someone’s human rights by not allowing them to commit a capital crime in another country and face their justice system?
Or what about jails? We’re sending refugees to Nauru and these Nauruians are locking them up for rioting.
What human rights obligation are we violating there? Habeus corpus? The Geneva Convention? Crimes against Humanity?
Sorry, I couldn’t help myself. I asked another question.