Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 30
th, 2013 at 2:21pm:
If you think that the air raids on Great Britain began and ended with the run up to the 1940 Battle of Britain you are either ignorant or stupid.
I can excuse Buzz because he isn't very intelligent and quite gullible as a result of not ever having learned much but others can't be excused.
That wasn't even my point anyway. I was disputing what you said about Germany's "sustained bombing" campaign against Britain, which didn't last beyond 12 months. I can see how it seemed that I was saying that Germany never bombed Britain ever again, but that's mainly because after typing out a much longer post I decided to just cut it short and didn't check carefully what I was posting. In the context of talking about a "sustained bombing" campaign, however, the bombing did stop -- momentarily.
My mistake, however, doesn't excuse you from exaggerating and making an inaccurate statement. Contrary to what you said, Britain did not suffer from anywhere near "5 years" of "sustained, solid daily bombings."
Starting from June 1941, Germany started invading the Soviet Union and they took 4,000 aircraft over there as well, meaning that Britain was mostly off the hook. They lost most of it there. Operation Steinbock in 1944 was nowhere near as successful as the original "blitz" over Britain. They lost a staggering 329 out of 524 bombers in that campaign, a much higher proportion of losses than during the whole Battle of Britain campaign. That was due to the lack of experience of their bomber crews then and much better British defences.
The V2 rockets were a spectacular achievement, but they didn't get to enjoy them for very long.
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 30
th, 2013 at 2:21pm:
I really do wonder just how much you people are taught about WW2 in the most important theatre of it, Europe.
We learnt Asian history when I was in secondary school, but there were plenty of books about WW2 in the school library covering both the Pacific and European theatres.