Aussie wrote on Aug 4
th, 2013 at 5:47pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 4
th, 2013 at 5:42pm:
So you don't think giving Enron a tick was an error?
Giving the sub prime lending restriction releases a big tick was an error?
These were both good decisions?
No, they were crap decisions, in hindsight, and if memory serves not less than a few of enrons senior executives were jailed for their part in the collapse. Some talk of lies to the market, I believe.
Not sure exactly what you mean about the 'sub-prime' mob. Are you referring to Lehmann Bros.?
The Sub Prime lending was comtrolled previously in the United States.
The US Government released restrictions which allowed lending to be self automated and those who approved lending to consumers were the same people who had their incentives based upon how many loans were given.
This created a huge bubble or a ticking time bomb in terms of future defaulting of credit.
Those bad loans were then packaged into multi facet investment vehicles and traded on the market.
Purchased by the investment banks and Governments such as Iceland loaned off these credit packages.
Which caused the downturn of 2008.
The IMF are on record as stating that the decision of the Clinton administration "is good for the market and enables a free market movement of credit which is good for the banking community"
A big tick if you like for one of the worst decisions on regulatory control made in modern times.