rabbitoh07 wrote on Aug 7
th, 2013 at 6:05pm:
Yes - I am sure you can find all sorts of wacky "opinions" on those blogs you read.
But don't you think it would be better to form your own opinions on actual peer reviewed science?
There not opinions my friend there either actual empirical data that has been observed in the real world.
Or there estimates from physics other than computer simulated models including past physical data that has been observed in the real world.
Quote:mproved estimates of upper-ocean warming and multi-decadal sea-level riseHere we report improved estimates of near-global ocean heat content and thermal expansion for the upper 300 m and 700 m of the ocean for 1950–2003, using statistical techniques that allow for sparse data coverage5, 6, 7 and applying recent corrections8 to reduce systematic biases in the most common ocean temperature observations9. Our ocean warming and thermal expansion trends for 1961–2003 are about 50 per cent larger than earlier estimates but about 40 per cent smaller for 1993–2003, which is consistent with the recognition that previously estimated rates for the 1990s had a positive bias as a result of instrumental errors8, 9, 10. On average, the decadal variability of the climate models with volcanic forcing now agrees approximately with the observations, but the modelled multi-decadal trends are smaller than observed. We add our observational estimate of upper-ocean thermal expansion to other contributions to sea-level rise and find that the sum of contributions from 1961 to 2003 is about 1.5 ± 0.4 mm yr-1, in good agreement with our updated estimate of near-global mean sea-level rise (using techniques established in earlier studies6, 7) of 1.6 ± 0.2 mm yr-1.http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7198/full/nature07080.html So your asking me to put my faith in a computer simulated model that had data feed into it from a faulty piece of equipment which was late adjusted to suit real world observations.
Thats precisly what i have been argueing against, that these computer simulated models cannot replicate the real world without the operators fixing parametric boundaries and then adjusting them to suit there hypothesis.
Quote:The oceans are warming.
This is why sea levels are rising.
3000 buoys in the ocean have collected observed data in the real world by diving down to depths of 2000 metres and recording the oceans temperature.
They say there is no warming.
Quote:If the oceans were not warming - why would sea levels be rising?
How much have sea levels risen, from memory in one of your last posts i think it said 50mm (2"), that could be the error margin right there dont you think.
No measurement is worth the paper its written on without some sort of error margin.
I repeat today we have some of the lowest temperatures and CO2 levels in our atmosphere since our history began and you're going to tell me that we should be taxed on the air we breath because both have risen alittle....?
Quote:Do you have some "evidence" by a children's TV presenter or Daily Mail columnist to tell us that sea levels are not rising?
So what they have gone up 50mm(2") thats probably less than the error margin for the reading.
Have a look here champ
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1375838504 Quote:And we are still waiting for you to answer:
Why has global glacial mass balance continued to decrease
Because the forrests and jungles at the foothill of the mountains has been turned into A4 paper.
Quote:if there has been no warming since the year 1998?
Why has the arctic ice cap continued to melt if there has been no warming since the year 1998?
Natural cycle of the Earth, its happened before and it will happen again, nothing new, greenland was once farmed, what happened to the glaciers then....??????
Quote:And, why has sea level continued to rise if there has been no warming since the year 1998?
SEE ABOVE....................
Quote:Any answers yet?
I got plenty just keep asking.....1
Quote:Or will you just continue to quote nonsense from denier blogs and tabloid newspaper columnists and pretend that decades of accumulated scientific evidence simply don't exist?
And computer simulated models are full of logic are they, sh!t in sh!t out computers are the dumbest pieces of equipment man has created, they will crunch any numbers whether it makes sense or NO.
Quote:And why do you continually repeat the lie:
the IPCC have admitted that there has been no warming since 1998?
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1366374129/47#47
Its not a lie, if its not warming and the teperature is falling what else can it be?
Stalling....???????
I dont know what you see in the graph below, but i see cooling.
Quote:We are waiting....
So am I.