Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
RUDD's misuse of the RA.A.F. (Read 4000 times)
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: RUDD's misuse of the RA.A.F.
Reply #45 - Aug 9th, 2013 at 3:56pm
 
Lobo wrote on Aug 9th, 2013 at 3:41pm:
That would be the odd whingy bit that I mentioned in my post.


DFRDB has always been crap, but nothing as bad as it is now, hence the bigger campaigns. They we bleating back in my day to, but nothing major.


To justify rudd's inaction by stating that none of the previous PM did anything too is a p1ss weak argument. Rudd's in charge now and he has the abiility to do something and he won't, plain and simple.


All's I can say Im glad I didn't get sucked into the DFRDB sh1t fight, vet affairs is crap enough for me.
--------------
I'm know the people involved at the time didn't regard their campaign as 'nothing major'.

But, and it's still a 'but', should Abbott win out at the coming election, don't expect any great changes.

And if/when they don't happen, we wont go back and blame Rudd, will we???

Wink




Yeah, I tend to blame the fvckwit in charge and at the moment it is rudd, so he can wear it.

I have no doubt those people thought is was a decent campaign, but as usual very little media, partly because civvies don't give a bugger about anything other than parades and fly pasts and media cares even less.

And if the people don't care the government don't care, add to that the ex-servicemen don't tend to kick up a stink.


You know why reffos get all the attention / money, is because there is nothing they are not willing to do to get noticed.



So no, your freind's campaign was really nothing major, and prolly ignored by all who shouldn't.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lobo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7407
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: RUDD's misuse of the RA.A.F.
Reply #46 - Aug 9th, 2013 at 4:11pm
 
BigOl64 wrote on Aug 9th, 2013 at 3:56pm:
Lobo wrote on Aug 9th, 2013 at 3:41pm:
That would be the odd whingy bit that I mentioned in my post.


DFRDB has always been crap, but nothing as bad as it is now, hence the bigger campaigns. They we bleating back in my day to, but nothing major.


To justify rudd's inaction by stating that none of the previous PM did anything too is a p1ss weak argument. Rudd's in charge now and he has the abiility to do something and he won't, plain and simple.


All's I can say Im glad I didn't get sucked into the DFRDB sh1t fight, vet affairs is crap enough for me.
--------------
I'm know the people involved at the time didn't regard their campaign as 'nothing major'.

But, and it's still a 'but', should Abbott win out at the coming election, don't expect any great changes.

And if/when they don't happen, we wont go back and blame Rudd, will we???

Wink




Yeah, I tend to blame the fvckwit in charge and at the moment it is rudd, so he can wear it.

I have no doubt those people thought is was a decent campaign, but as usual very little media, partly because civvies don't give a bugger about anything other than parades and fly pasts and media cares even less.

And if the people don't care the government don't care, add to that the ex-servicemen don't tend to kick up a stink.

You know why reffos get all the attention / money, is because there is nothing they are not willing to do to get noticed.

So no, your freind's campaign was really nothing major, and prolly ignored by all who shouldn't.


I agree that there was 'very little media', but that's the way things were done then.

My 'freind's campaign', as you call it, involved the whole RSL movement.

But anyway, as you said, you didn't get involved in the sh!tfight and that's fair enough.
Maybe you should have, and then we mightn't be having this chat.....

Smiley
Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
Verge
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6329
Gender: male
Re: RUDD's misuse of the RA.A.F.
Reply #47 - Aug 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm
 
I dont think Rudd would have said "I have to be taken on this specific plane".

I think our ADF would have made the decision on the best method of transport.
Back to top
 

And why not, if you will permit me; why shouldn’t I, if you will permit me; spend my first week as prime minister, should that happen, on this, on your, country - Abbott with the Garma People Aug 13
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: RUDD's misuse of the RA.A.F.
Reply #48 - Aug 9th, 2013 at 6:35pm
 
Verge wrote on Aug 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
I dont think Rudd would have said "I have to be taken on this specific plane".

I think our ADF would have made the decision on the best method of transport.


for normal people I would agree.  But it is more than conceivable that Rudd asked specifically for that plane.  His ego is after all enormous and his desire to impress anyone and everyone is equa;;y huge.

Keating was a egotist but compared to Rudd looks more like Mother Theresa.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Lobo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7407
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: RUDD's misuse of the RA.A.F.
Reply #49 - Aug 9th, 2013 at 7:12pm
 
Verge wrote on Aug 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
I dont think Rudd would have said "I have to be taken on this specific plane".

I think our ADF would have made the decision on the best method of transport.


Exactly right...
And let's face it, if his ego was one quarter as large as some would suggest, he would not have decided on that plane........

Smiley

Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print