longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12
th, 2013 at 7:32pm:
Kat wrote on Aug 12
th, 2013 at 6:51pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12
th, 2013 at 6:39pm:
Kat wrote on Aug 12
th, 2013 at 6:21pm:
cods wrote on Aug 12
th, 2013 at 5:36pm:
Peter Freedman wrote on Aug 12
th, 2013 at 4:06pm:
cods wrote on Aug 12
th, 2013 at 2:39pm:
Fit of Absent Mindeness wrote on Aug 12
th, 2013 at 2:31pm:
cods wrote on Aug 12
th, 2013 at 2:24pm:
Fit of Absent Mindeness wrote on Aug 12
th, 2013 at 2:19pm:
I think it was a mis-step, but it is pretty funny!
bla bla cheater big white elephant nbn tax
Why so serious?
so YOU CHEAT AS WELL>>>.I dont happen to think CHEATING IS FUNNY sorry...
as for your humour again it escapes me.... but then you probably think a selfy in the bathroom mirror by the PM is hilarious.
C'mon, cods, this is funny, like Julia Gillard's "hyperbowl".
Shows why Abbott is kept away from the press and public as much as possible, he suffers foot in mouth disease.
rhubarb rhubarb
sorry pete but one word... REALLY...LOL.. no it doesnt amuse me..suppository isnt funny just the same as the F word doesnt amuse me...
spring it on me tomorrow I am sure you guys will still be talking about it...
like us righties will still be talking about
the MASSIVE CHEATING...
they say little things amuse little boys I guess they were spot on..
Er, would that be the 'cheating' that DIDN'T HAPPEN except in the fevered imaginations of the Right?
so you are actually saying that Rudd DIDNT cheat??? you obviously
missed Rudd apologising for it this morning (although blaming someone else).
That's possible, I don't usually have a TV or computer on the scaffold with me while I'm painting ceilings.
Doesn't change the fact that
I don't consider that he cheated.
Nor the fact that if he had, the moderator should have called him on it
then, not later.
You don't rule a batsman out, or disallow a try
after the game.
using the sports metaphor since it might be all you are able to understand, even if the umpire makes a mistake that doesn't stop the fact that it was in error. If a batsman refuses to walk even though even person on the field and the stands heard it and the umpire doesn't, this doesn't then mean it didn't happen.
Rudd cheated and the fact he wasn't called for it at the time
does not in any way change the fact. and your OPINION doesn't count. he clearly and unequivocally breached rules and you are so far the only knuckle-head to not accept that.
Terrribly sorry, but it does. Quite a lot.
So what's your point, apart from disagreeing for the sake of it?
My 'opinion' counts just as much as yours, or that of ANYONE else. And you or anyone else
disagreeing doesn't make me wrong. ALL it means is that you disagree (as usual). So the abuse
is unnecessary and unwarranted (again, as usual).
And, if you can't reply to my posts without denigrating or abusing, please don't bother.
If you think I'll allow myself to be driven from this forum by it (as has happened to others)
then I'm afraid you're doomed to disappointment.
We realise some of you'd like this forum to be simply a cheer-squad for the Liberal Party, but
that isn't going to happen either.