longweekend58 wrote on Aug 21
st, 2013 at 12:28pm:
# wrote on Aug 21
st, 2013 at 12:08pm:
# wrote on Aug 18
th, 2013 at 11:36am:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 18
th, 2013 at 8:53am:
...
so you are telling me that at some stage, the tv network which can be viewed anywhere on a TV will only be able to be viewed when plugged into the NBN? ...
It has been mooted, I'm told.
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 18
th, 2013 at 8:53am:
... And I guess you think this is some improvement?
Evidently, someone thinks so. I don't pretend to know enough to have an opinion either way.
The more I think about this, the fewer objections I see. I once bought a battery-powered TV. It was black & white, which gives some idea of when I bought it. I rarely used it and didn't buy a replacement.
In short, for decades I haven't used a TV that wasn't plugged into a power socket. If a TV is already going to be tied to a wall socket, what difference does another cable make?
These days, we have so-called "smart TVs" that are pretty useless without an Internet connection. That connection
can be wireless, but wireless tends to fail on HD content.
My home TV is far from smart. Even so, a couple of years ago, I had a couple of network sockets installed behind it. Two sockets proved inadequate, so I added a four-port switch. Components attached to the TV that need network access include:
- PVR with online schedule;
- media player (my media is stored on devices on my home network);
- Android dongle (which came with WiFi that proved inadequate) and
- an old PC that has been pressed into service as a tuner/PVR/server.
I guess it comes down to the best value use of the spectrum. Given a free fibre connection to the vast majority of premises, is there a higher value use for the spectrum?
what a silly response. does every powerpopint In your house where you might choose to plug-in a TV is there a Ethernet internet connection right next to it?
Is there an antenna socket next to every power point in your house?
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 21
st, 2013 at 12:28pm:
Your comments about smart-TVs make you look rather silly. Since when was a smart-tv useless without internet???? do u even own one???
From:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_TV Quote:A smart TV, sometimes referred to as connected TV or hybrid TV, (not to be confused with IPTV, Internet TV, or with Web TV), describes a trend of integration of the Internet and Web 2.0 features into television sets and set-top boxes, as well as the technological convergence between computers and these television sets / set-top boxes. The devices have a higher focus on online interactive media, Internet TV, over-the-top content, as well as on-demand streaming media, and less focus on traditional broadcast media ...
El58, you've made a fool of yourself again.
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 21
st, 2013 at 12:28pm:
free-to-air TV will never be on cable. that defeats the purpose of it.
What is that purpose? Would transmitting free TV by cable really defeat it?
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 21
st, 2013 at 12:28pm:
Your belief that TV will go tot he NBN is one of the stupidest and most idiotic suggestions Ive heard yet. I think tho that the title of stupidest definitely goes to conroy and Gillard thinking that the NBN will empty hospital beds because health care can be delivered over the internet. that was THE DUD of the NBN argument.
I try to avoid belief. This was a possible use to which, at the time, you raised little objection while tacitly acknowledging its validity. I've just been thinking about it and my doubts have decreased.
No need to hyperventilate.