Australian Politics Forum - Fairfax nails a long-time Labor lie

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Fairfax nails a long-time Labor lie
Reply #30 - Aug 16^th, 2013 at 3:15pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 1:49pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 1:03pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 11:36am:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 8:58am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 15^th, 2013 at 7:13pm:

If I tell you I am giving you 100, for which you make your plans, and then I only give you $10, I have taken $90 out of your budget. What part of that is difficult for the morons on here?

Except that isn't the argument is it?

The argument is that you currently get $33 and you WANT $43. I then give you $42. no matter how you describe that it is an INCREASE in funding and s substantial one.

and you still haven't addressed that lie about Abbott since he wasn't even involved in the discussion or decision!

Did you even bother to read the OP?

'The increase was around $1 billion less than foreshadowed a year earlier'

that is, in effect, exactly what they had said. Back in your box you idiot.

and increase of $9B is NEVER going to be a decrease of $1B ergo a lie. Blaming Abbott for this is also a lie since he wasn't even health minister at the time. Another Lie

did you take your stupid pills today? If I tell you I am going to give you, next year, $100 000 on this date, and you allow for this money, then on the day I give you $50 000 ... I've just ripped $50 000 out of your budget ... don't try to pretend I didn't just because the money wasn't in your pocket to start with.

Do you spend money before you get it? (don't even think of answering no) What does it do to your budget if your don't get the money you were supposed too?

and there is that basic English comprehension problem again where you equate 'lower INCREASE' with 'decrease'.

it is hard to debate with a person whose understanding of the English language is so poor.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75137
Gender: male

Re: Fairfax nails a long-time Labor lie
Reply #31 - Aug 16^th, 2013 at 4:19pm

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 3:15pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 1:49pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 1:03pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 11:36am:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 8:58am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 15^th, 2013 at 7:13pm:

If I tell you I am giving you 100, for which you make your plans, and then I only give you $10, I have taken $90 out of your budget. What part of that is difficult for the morons on here?

Except that isn't the argument is it?

The argument is that you currently get $33 and you WANT $43. I then give you $42. no matter how you describe that it is an INCREASE in funding and s substantial one.

and you still haven't addressed that lie about Abbott since he wasn't even involved in the discussion or decision!

Did you even bother to read the OP?

'The increase was around $1 billion less than foreshadowed a year earlier'

that is, in effect, exactly what they had said. Back in your box you idiot.

and increase of $9B is NEVER going to be a decrease of $1B ergo a lie. Blaming Abbott for this is also a lie since he wasn't even health minister at the time. Another Lie

did you take your stupid pills today? If I tell you I am going to give you, next year, $100 000 on this date, and you allow for this money, then on the day I give you $50 000 ... I've just ripped $50 000 out of your budget ... don't try to pretend I didn't just because the money wasn't in your pocket to start with.

Do you spend money before you get it? (don't even think of answering no) What does it do to your budget if your don't get the money you were supposed too?

and there is that basic English comprehension problem again where you equate 'lower INCREASE' with 'decrease'.

it is hard to debate with a person whose understanding of the English language is so poor.

so you overdosed on the stupid pill ....

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Fairfax nails a long-time Labor lie
Reply #32 - Aug 16^th, 2013 at 5:21pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 4:19pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 3:15pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 1:49pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 1:03pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 11:36am:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 16^th, 2013 at 8:58am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 15^th, 2013 at 7:13pm:

If I tell you I am giving you 100, for which you make your plans, and then I only give you $10, I have taken $90 out of your budget. What part of that is difficult for the morons on here?

Except that isn't the argument is it?

The argument is that you currently get $33 and you WANT $43. I then give you $42. no matter how you describe that it is an INCREASE in funding and s substantial one.

and you still haven't addressed that lie about Abbott since he wasn't even involved in the discussion or decision!

Did you even bother to read the OP?

'The increase was around $1 billion less than foreshadowed a year earlier'

that is, in effect, exactly what they had said. Back in your box you idiot.

and increase of $9B is NEVER going to be a decrease of $1B ergo a lie. Blaming Abbott for this is also a lie since he wasn't even health minister at the time. Another Lie

did you take your stupid pills today? If I tell you I am going to give you, next year, $100 000 on this date, and you allow for this money, then on the day I give you $50 000 ... I've just ripped $50 000 out of your budget ... don't try to pretend I didn't just because the money wasn't in your pocket to start with.

Do you spend money before you get it? (don't even think of answering no) What does it do to your budget if your don't get the money you were supposed too?

and there is that basic English comprehension problem again where you equate 'lower INCREASE' with 'decrease'.

it is hard to debate with a person whose understanding of the English language is so poor.

so you overdosed on the stupid pill ....

QED.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 45675 Gender:	Re: Fairfax nails a long-time Labor lie Reply #33 - Aug 22^nd, 2013 at 6:16pm Time to remind everyone of yet another Labor lie....
Back to top	AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..." IP Logged