Australian Politics Forum - libs defend drug dealers

True Colours Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2837 Gender:	Re: libs defend drug dealers Reply #45 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 8:50am RightSadFred wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 8:25am: So cops should only socialise with people who have clean records ? Cops shouldn't socialise with heroin dealers...and neither should politicians. I am happy for both to lose their jobs for consorting with criminals.
Back to top	« Last Edit: Aug 17^th, 2013 at 9:01am by True Colours » IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 140086
Gender: male

Re: libs defend drug dealers
Reply #46 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 9:04am

cods wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 7:51am:

hilarious............he has disputed they were members all the way through this thread... and now he claims he wasnt disputing that fact.....and its all there in black and white...

Incorrect. Go back and read the posts again.

It was claimed that he was a member of the ALP when he was convicted. That claim is quite simply wrong.

Nobody is disputing the fact that he was a member of the ALP before he was convicted. Absolutely no-one.

To refresh your memory:

"show me anyone who was convicted of any of those thing, and is a member of labor?"

He was convicted, but was not a member of Labor at the time. Moreover, he's not an ALP member now.

Capiche?

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 75379 Gender:	Re: libs defend drug dealers Reply #47 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:43am greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 9:04am: Capiche? I'm having all my neighbours translate that into a few different languages ... they seem to struggle with English.
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

RightSadFred

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2220
Gender: male

Re: libs defend drug dealers
Reply #48 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:46am

True Colours wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 8:50am:

RightSadFred wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 8:25am:

So cops should only socialise with people who have clean records ?

Cops shouldn't socialise with heroin dealers...and neither should politicians.

I am happy for both to lose their jobs for consorting with criminals.

True Colours

According to you ?

Nothing to add other than babbling ?

Back to top

IP Logged

stryder

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4545
Gender: male

Re: libs defend drug dealers
Reply #49 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:50am

John Smith wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 9:04am:

Capiche?

I'm having all my neighbours translate that into a few different languages ... they seem to struggle with English.

I guess spinning around the distinction of when he was and wasnt a labor member is the best you can do in your argument which is becoming more hilarious

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59448
Here
Gender: male

Re: libs defend drug dealers
Reply #50 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:53am

Quote:

"I was later promoted to Inspector and went on to become Superintendent of Cabramatta, Fairfield and Liverpool local area commands."

They put the drinking mate of a high level drug dealer in charge of Fairfield, Cabramatta ??????

If Labor had the low moral standing the Liberals do they would treat this guy in the same manner that Thomson and Slipper were treated.

Anyone want to see this sent back to be re investigated about 7 times ??

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 140086
Gender: male

Re: libs defend drug dealers
Reply #51 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:55am

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:50am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 9:04am:

Capiche?

I'm having all my neighbours translate that into a few different languages ... they seem to struggle with English.

I guess spinning around the distinction of when he was and wasnt a labor member is the best you can do in your argument which is becoming more hilarious

There's no "argument" or hilarity about it: he is not an ALP member, and he was not an ALP member when he was convicted.

If you'd like to "argue" against these facts, by all means give it your best shot.

Well?

Back to top

IP Logged

stryder

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4545
Gender: male

Re: libs defend drug dealers
Reply #52 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:56am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:55am:

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:50am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 9:04am:

Capiche?

I'm having all my neighbours translate that into a few different languages ... they seem to struggle with English.

I guess spinning around the distinction of when he was and wasnt a labor member is the best you can do in your argument which is becoming more hilarious

There's no "argument" or hilarity about it: he is not an ALP member, and he was not an ALP member when he was convicted.

If you'd like to "argue" against these facts, by all means give it your best shot.

Well?

Just like I said

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 140086
Gender: male

Re: libs defend drug dealers
Reply #53 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:58am

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:56am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:55am:

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:50am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 9:04am:

Capiche?

I'm having all my neighbours translate that into a few different languages ... they seem to struggle with English.

I guess spinning around the distinction of when he was and wasnt a labor member is the best you can do in your argument which is becoming more hilarious

There's no "argument" or hilarity about it: he is not an ALP member, and he was not an ALP member when he was convicted.

If you'd like to "argue" against these facts, by all means give it your best shot.

Well?

Just like I said

White flag accepted.

Next!

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59448
Here
Gender: male

Re: libs defend drug dealers
Reply #54 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 11:00am

True Colours wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 8:50am:

RightSadFred wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 8:25am:

So cops should only socialise with people who have clean records ?

Cops shouldn't socialise with heroin dealers...and neither should politicians.

I am happy for both to lose their jobs for consorting with criminals.

Criminals mainly want to socialise with Politicians and police because of the benefits and protection that can come from the relationship. This type of association is the first step towards serious police corruption.

Anyone not concerned by this has rocks in their head.

Back to top

IP Logged

stryder

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4545
Gender: male

Re: libs defend drug dealers
Reply #55 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 11:03am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:58am:

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:56am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:55am:

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:50am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 9:04am:

Capiche?

I'm having all my neighbours translate that into a few different languages ... they seem to struggle with English.

I guess spinning around the distinction of when he was and wasnt a labor member is the best you can do in your argument which is becoming more hilarious

There's no "argument" or hilarity about it: he is not an ALP member, and he was not an ALP member when he was convicted.

If you'd like to "argue" against these facts, by all means give it your best shot.

Well?

Just like I said

White flag accepted.

Next!

I guess he needs to make himself feel better with that post , Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 140086
Gender: male

Re: libs defend drug dealers
Reply #56 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 11:06am

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:58am:

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:56am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:55am:

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:50am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 9:04am:

Capiche?

I'm having all my neighbours translate that into a few different languages ... they seem to struggle with English.

I guess spinning around the distinction of when he was and wasnt a labor member is the best you can do in your argument which is becoming more hilarious

There's no "argument" or hilarity about it: he is not an ALP member, and he was not an ALP member when he was convicted.

If you'd like to "argue" against these facts, by all means give it your best shot.

Well?

Just like I said

White flag accepted.

Next!

I guess he needs to make himself feel better with that post , Grin

No, your white flag post did that nicely. Thank you.

Back to top

IP Logged

Life_goes_on Gold Member Offline Posts: 4772 400kms south of Yobsville, Qld Gender:	Re: libs defend drug dealers Reply #57 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 11:09am I like drug dealers. They sell me what I want. To me they're the ultimate public servants. In a business at great personal risk to provide the sale of a product that myself and others want. Good on the libs to look past societies prejudices.
Back to top	"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013 Num num num num. IP Logged

stryder

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4545
Gender: male

Re: libs defend drug dealers
Reply #58 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 11:11am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 11:06am:

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:58am:

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:56am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:55am:

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:50am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 9:04am:

Capiche?

I'm having all my neighbours translate that into a few different languages ... they seem to struggle with English.

I guess spinning around the distinction of when he was and wasnt a labor member is the best you can do in your argument which is becoming more hilarious

There's no "argument" or hilarity about it: he is not an ALP member, and he was not an ALP member when he was convicted.

If you'd like to "argue" against these facts, by all means give it your best shot.

Well?

Just like I said

White flag accepted.

Next!

I guess he needs to make himself feel better with that post , Grin

No, your white flag post did that nicely. Thank you.

Oh your saw a white flag, did you ??, I couldnt imagine you would see anything apart from your useless and baseless spining on distinction on when he was and wasnt a party member,

there is no white flag, its just your not running on inteligience now, but rather stupidity.

but take it anyway you like

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 140086
Gender: male

Re: libs defend drug dealers
Reply #59 - Aug 17^th, 2013 at 11:16am

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 11:11am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 11:06am:

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:58am:

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:56am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:55am:

stryder wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:50am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 10:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 17^th, 2013 at 9:04am:

Capiche?

I'm having all my neighbours translate that into a few different languages ... they seem to struggle with English.

I guess spinning around the distinction of when he was and wasnt a labor member is the best you can do in your argument which is becoming more hilarious

There's no "argument" or hilarity about it: he is not an ALP member, and he was not an ALP member when he was convicted.

If you'd like to "argue" against these facts, by all means give it your best shot.

Well?

Just like I said

White flag accepted.

Next!

I guess he needs to make himself feel better with that post , Grin

No, your white flag post did that nicely. Thank you.

Oh your saw a white flag, did you ??, I couldnt imagine you would see anything apart from your useless and baseless spining on distinction on when he was and wasnt a party member,

When he was and wasn't a party member is the whole point. Haven't you been reading the thread ?

So, here's you chance then: prove me wrong.

Was he an ALP member when he was convicted? (because that's the actual point that's being disputed).

Yes, or no?

A simple question.

Do you have a simple answer?

Undecided

Back to top

IP Logged