perceptions_now
Gold Member
Offline
Australian Politics
Posts: 11694
Perth WA
Gender:
|
As is often the case, this is far from simple!
Just to add to the complexity, I would suggest that the Baby Bonus should be viewed in concert with PPL.
In doing so, I would suggest doing away with the Baby Bonus completely, BUT retaining the PPL in a modest format only, perhaps something like the current arrangement.
The Economic imperative that was once the centre piece of most government/s planning was to increase Economic Growth, with Population increase & having more babies, being thought of as the easiest way of achieving those goals.
However, with Energy Supply likely to fall substantially over the decades ahead & prices rising, plus substantial Declines in Food & Fresh water Supply, we have to change our thinking on these issues, NOW!
Whilst families may still want children, although many will restrict the numbers or not have them at all, it must now remain in the province of those families to make their own decisions and to largely cater for their decision/s on child rearing, themselves.
That said, there still remains an imperative to retain as many female workers in the workforce as possible.
Therefore, some PPL will still be required, to try to get as many female workers thru the initial Baby phase, whilst keeping the family unit finances afloat, but also to incentivize them back into the workforce, as quickly as possible.
These and many other issues, should form part of a whole of government review, which should happen as soon as possible, irrespective of who wins this election!
|