Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Should Public Servants Vote For Liberal. (Read 2027 times)
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Re: Should Public Servants Vote For Liberal.
Reply #15 - Aug 29th, 2013 at 6:49am
 
Abbott to axe jobs within weeks.

Date
    August 29, 2013


The Coalition plans to start axing federal public service jobs just three weeks after it is elected.      Sad    

A Tony Abbott-led government will then need to cut more than 660 jobs a month between October and June next year as it looks to move quickly to lock in its projected savings.

Correspondence between the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) and senior Coalition frontbenchers shows that the axe will fall on public service jobs in just over a month if Mr Abbott wins government. The documents, which have been used to underpin Coalition costings, confirm the target of 6000 positions to be axed between October 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014, with the opposition still insisting that the cuts will be achieved through natural attrition. The Coalition believes its first tranche of cuts will be enough to reach its ambitious target of saving $303 million this financial year if it forms government after the September 7 election.

The Canberra Times understands there are plans for another 6000 jobs to be cut in the 15 months between July, 2014, and September, 2015, and savings of $1.2 billion in the 2014-2015 financial year are expected, according to the correspondence between shadow ministers and the PBO.


The Coalition's plan, which has still not been made public in detail, then calls for $1.7 billion in savings in 2015-2016 and $1.92 billion in 2016-2017 - $5.1 billion ripped out of the federal public service in the forward-estimates period.      Sad

The revelations come as the two main political parties continued to exchange blows over public service job cuts, with Finance Minister Penny Wong releasing PBO data she said proved the Coalition would have to cut 20,000 public servants to achieve its saving targets.

Coalition campaign spokesman Christopher Pyne hit back, demanding to know why the costings had been commissioned in March this year and accusing the government of planning its own massive cuts.

"Kevin Rudd and Penny Wong must come clean and explain why the Labor Party asked the Independent Parliamentary Budget Office to cost a 20,000 reduction in public servants," Mr Pyne said.

Despite the Coalition's need to cut more than 160 jobs a week in its first nine months in office, Mr Pyne insisted that there would be no forced redundancies.

"There is no ambiguity about the Coalition's position," he said. "We have clearly stated that, if elected, we will reduce the Commonwealth public service by 12,000 through natural attrition.

"Independent fact-checking units have found Labor's claims that an incoming Coalition government would cut 20,000 jobs to be false."

Australia's main public sector union the CPSU, also weighed in on Wednesday, saying Senator Wong's figure showed the Coalition had a "credibility problem'' on public service jobs.

"The information released today by the Liberal Party does nothing to address their growing credibility problem on public service cuts," national secretary Nadine Flood said.

"One minute the Liberals are claiming the public service has grown by 20,000 under Labor. The next they want us to believe Labor have cut 10,000 public service jobs. They can't have it both ways."      Sad

The union also said the opposition's position on natural attrition was contradicted by its own PBO costings. "The PBO paper released today poured cold water on the Coalition's claim it will save $5.2 billion by reducing the public service by 12,000 through natural attrition," Ms Flood said.      Sad

Read more: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/abbott-to-axe-jobs-within-weeks-20130828-2sr51.html#ixzz2dIZtygWj
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25830
Gender: male
Re: Should Public Servants Vote For Liberal.
Reply #16 - Aug 29th, 2013 at 6:51am
 
Quote:
Abbott to axe jobs within weeks.

Date
    August 29, 2013


The Coalition plans to start axing federal public service jobs just three weeks after it is elected.      Sad    

A Tony Abbott-led government will then need to cut more than 660 jobs a month between October and June next year as it looks to move quickly to lock in its projected savings.

Correspondence between the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) and senior Coalition frontbenchers shows that the axe will fall on public service jobs in just over a month if Mr Abbott wins government. The documents, which have been used to underpin Coalition costings, confirm the target of 6000 positions to be axed between October 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014, with the opposition still insisting that the cuts will be achieved through natural attrition. The Coalition believes its first tranche of cuts will be enough to reach its ambitious target of saving $303 million this financial year if it forms government after the September 7 election.

The Canberra Times understands there are plans for another 6000 jobs to be cut in the 15 months between July, 2014, and September, 2015, and savings of $1.2 billion in the 2014-2015 financial year are expected, according to the correspondence between shadow ministers and the PBO.


The Coalition's plan, which has still not been made public in detail, then calls for $1.7 billion in savings in 2015-2016 and $1.92 billion in 2016-2017 - $5.1 billion ripped out of the federal public service in the forward-estimates period.      Sad

The revelations come as the two main political parties continued to exchange blows over public service job cuts, with Finance Minister Penny Wong releasing PBO data she said proved the Coalition would have to cut 20,000 public servants to achieve its saving targets.

Coalition campaign spokesman Christopher Pyne hit back, demanding to know why the costings had been commissioned in March this year and accusing the government of planning its own massive cuts.

"Kevin Rudd and Penny Wong must come clean and explain why the Labor Party asked the Independent Parliamentary Budget Office to cost a 20,000 reduction in public servants," Mr Pyne said.


Despite the Coalition's need to cut more than 160 jobs a week in its first nine months in office, Mr Pyne insisted that there would be no forced redundancies.

"There is no ambiguity about the Coalition's position," he said. "We have clearly stated that, if elected, we will reduce the Commonwealth public service by 12,000 through natural attrition.

"Independent fact-checking units have found Labor's claims that an incoming Coalition government would cut 20,000 jobs to be false."

Australia's main public sector union the CPSU, also weighed in on Wednesday, saying Senator Wong's figure showed the Coalition had a "credibility problem'' on public service jobs.

"The information released today by the Liberal Party does nothing to address their growing credibility problem on public service cuts," national secretary Nadine Flood said.

"One minute the Liberals are claiming the public service has grown by 20,000 under Labor. The next they want us to believe Labor have cut 10,000 public service jobs. They can't have it both ways."      Sad

The union also said the opposition's position on natural attrition was contradicted by its own PBO costings. "The PBO paper released today poured cold water on the Coalition's claim it will save $5.2 billion by reducing the public service by 12,000 through natural attrition," Ms Flood said.      Sad

Read more: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/abbott-to-axe-jobs-within-weeks-20130828-2sr51.html#ixzz2dIZtygWj


Why is Labor planning their own cuts???
Back to top
 

Scott Morrison DID wipe the floor with Bull Shitten!!! Smiley Smiley Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34408
Gender: male
Re: Should Public Servants Vote For Liberal.
Reply #17 - Aug 29th, 2013 at 6:55am
 
12,000 is a woeful effort and underlines just how far the liberals have become big government , cradle to grave, middle class welfare sell outs.

ANYONE who works in health and cant name 20 patients they SAW yesterday.
ANYONE who works in education and cant name 20 students they TAUGHT yesterday
ANYONE who works in law and order and cant name 20 criminals they talked to yesterday
should be escorted by security to the nearest centrelink office.
they should then be made to swear an oath to never again hold a clipboard, to never again gossip round the water bubbler and to try to repay their debt to society for their years of treachery
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: Should Public Servants Vote For Liberal.
Reply #18 - Aug 29th, 2013 at 7:04am
 
Dnarever wrote on Aug 28th, 2013 at 9:04pm:
Should Public Servants Vote For Liberal.


Don't see how anyone with an IQ in double figures would.


That's why education has been rapidly declining.....so they do!
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
red baron
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10204
Blue Mountains
Gender: male
Re: Should Public Servants Vote For Liberal.
Reply #19 - Aug 29th, 2013 at 7:08am
 
Abbott has said that the Public Service will be reduced by natural attrition, no one will be kicked out the door.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: Should Public Servants Vote For Liberal.
Reply #20 - Aug 29th, 2013 at 11:41am
 
Quote:
Should Public Servants Vote For Liberal


Depends whether they want the VRS?

I expect the vast majority of Tax-payers' blood sucking public servants don't anyway
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Life_goes_on
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4772
400kms south of Yobsville, Qld
Gender: male
Re: Should Public Servants Vote For Liberal.
Reply #21 - Aug 29th, 2013 at 12:18pm
 
12,000 is about a 10% reduction in numbers. That's on top of roughly another 8% they've been reduced by over the past 12 months.

Hardly a "woeful effort".
Back to top
 

"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013

Num num num num.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print