Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
12,000 natural attrition (Read 1164 times)
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
12,000 natural attrition
Sep 5th, 2013 at 7:51pm
 
Anyone one the left care to make an educated guess what this means?

Then match it up with what Labor says about this

Does it match up seamlessly?
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38530
Gender: male
Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #1 - Sep 5th, 2013 at 7:56pm
 
I'll tell you what it means when the LNP use it, taking the Campbell Newman model as the exemplar.

It means targetted Public Servants will be sent a letter giving them an option of pissing off (with a redundancy package) or not pissing off, risking the wrath of Khan and have to apply to hold the job they presently have. 

They choose to piss off....and that is called 'natural attrition.'
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #2 - Sep 5th, 2013 at 8:02pm
 
Aussie wrote on Sep 5th, 2013 at 7:56pm:
I'll tell you what it means when the LNP use it, taking the Campbell Newman model as the exemplar.

It means targetted Public Servants will be sent a letter giving them an option of pissing off (with a redundancy package) or not pissing off, risking the wrath of Khan and have to apply to hold the job they presently have. 

They choose to piss off....and that is called 'natural attrition.'



"Campbell Newman exemplar"
Then should we use the NSW ALP corruption exemplar to condemn Rudd?


"They choose to piss off"
It's a choice to piss off. So how can Labor truthfully say that LIBs will "slash" jobs
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38530
Gender: male
Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #3 - Sep 5th, 2013 at 8:09pm
 
Sure, it's a choice.  What will you have?

(a)  The desert island with a gallon of water, or
(b)  The desert island with zero water.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Life_goes_on
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4772
400kms south of Yobsville, Qld
Gender: male
Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #4 - Sep 5th, 2013 at 8:13pm
 
Quote:
It's a choice to piss off. So how can Labor truthfully say that LIBs will "slash" jobs


Because they're speaking from experience. That's exactly what they've been doing for the past 12 months or so with 8,000 gone already - or roughly 6% of the total head count.

12,000 is about 10% if you remove those in the armed forces from the headcount.
Back to top
 

"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013

Num num num num.
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #5 - Sep 5th, 2013 at 8:16pm
 
12,000 public servants in Canberra and 16,000 from the closing of GMH in SA..and thats just the beginning of Abbotts job losses.
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #6 - Sep 5th, 2013 at 8:22pm
 
Aussie wrote on Sep 5th, 2013 at 8:09pm:
Sure, it's a choice.  What will you have?

(a)  The desert island with a gallon of water, or
(b)  The desert island with zero water.



So it's not slashing as per Rudd's lies
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34388
Gender: male
Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #7 - Sep 5th, 2013 at 8:49pm
 
i would never count public service job losses as real job losses as they dont exist in the real economy.
they are a win for the real economy , and as such, should be counted as a bonus.
we (the private sector) dont want to employ any of those public servants though, as they are tarnished goods. it would take years to retrain them in efficient work practices.
personally, they should all be parked in extensive 'work for the dole ' projects, and be made available to the private sector to do menial tasks like washing our cars, cleaning our toilets, maybe fetching the mail.
tony is aiming way too low with these numbers. i'd close canberra down and operate the country from kirribilli
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #8 - Sep 5th, 2013 at 9:32pm
 
Aussie wrote on Sep 5th, 2013 at 8:09pm:
Sure, it's a choice.  What will you have?

(a)  The desert island with a gallon of water, or
(b)  The desert island with zero water.




No BUCKETS of MONEY that those who work in the private sector do not get....they get whats laughingly called packages....

and they even ask if any packages are being offered...yes they do.....


ooooooo if you only knew........ Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Peter Freedman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5275
Wellington
Gender: male
Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #9 - Sep 5th, 2013 at 9:33pm
 
Maqqa wrote on Sep 5th, 2013 at 7:51pm:
Anyone one the left care to make an educated guess what this means?

Then match it up with what Labor says about this

Does it match up seamlessly?


Can someone translate please? I don't speak Maqqa.
Back to top
 

God grant me the patience to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can and, above all, the wisdom to tell the difference.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 74262
Gender: male
Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #10 - Sep 5th, 2013 at 9:35pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Sep 5th, 2013 at 8:49pm:
i would never count public service job losses as real job losses as they dont exist in the real economy.
they are a win for the real economy , and as such, should be counted as a bonus.
we (the private sector) dont want to employ any of those public servants though, as they are tarnished goods. it would take years to retrain them in efficient work practices.
personally, they should all be parked in extensive 'work for the dole ' projects, and be made available to the private sector to do menial tasks like washing our cars, cleaning our toilets, maybe fetching the mail.
tony is aiming way too low with these numbers. i'd close canberra down and operate the country from kirribilli


and there is the reason why you'll never be put in charge of anything bigger than your vege patch.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 74262
Gender: male
Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #11 - Sep 5th, 2013 at 9:35pm
 
Peter Freedman wrote on Sep 5th, 2013 at 9:33pm:
Maqqa wrote on Sep 5th, 2013 at 7:51pm:
Anyone one the left care to make an educated guess what this means?

Then match it up with what Labor says about this

Does it match up seamlessly?


Can someone translate please? I don't speak Maqqa.


Sorry, neither does he ... he can't tell you what he means either
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
#
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603
Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #12 - Sep 6th, 2013 at 8:10am
 
In a nutshell, "natural attrition" means that nobody loses their job (some may be forced or bullied out of their jobs, but none "lose" their job). Instead, people who might otherwise have been employed don't get a job. They stay on benefits.

Win-win, hey?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Rider
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2669
OnTheRoad
Gender: male
Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #13 - Sep 6th, 2013 at 8:18am
 
aquascoot wrote on Sep 5th, 2013 at 8:49pm:
i would never count public service job losses as real job losses as they dont exist in the real economy.
they are a win for the real economy , and as such, should be counted as a bonus.
we (the private sector) dont want to employ any of those public servants though, as they are tarnished goods. it would take years to retrain them in efficient work practices.
personally, they should all be parked in extensive 'work for the dole ' projects, and be made available to the private sector to do menial tasks like washing our cars, cleaning our toilets, maybe fetching the mail.
tony is aiming way too low with these numbers. i'd close canberra down and operate the country from kirribilli


Correct on all counts   Smiley

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Re: 12,000 natural attrition
Reply #14 - Sep 6th, 2013 at 8:20am
 
Maybe they will be able to join the other 14,000 plus, that went before.  Thanks to Campbell ( the job wreaker ) Newman.      Sad
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print