Australian Politics Forum - Labor's primary lowest in 100 years

Maqqa Gold Member Offline 14% - that low?! Posts: 16000	Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:17pm This is an indictment on Rudd the selfish self-absorb selfie seeker
Back to top	Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 59448 Here Gender:	Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Reply #1 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:19pm Maqqa wrote on Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:17pm: This is an indictment on Rudd the selfish self-absorb selfie seeker More an indictment of Abbott - the first thing he had to say - what a grub.
Back to top	IP Logged

____ Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 33410 Australia Gender:	Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Reply #2 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:20pm Yep, Bott has no class.
Back to top	IP Logged

Maqqa Gold Member Offline 14% - that low?! Posts: 16000	Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Reply #3 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:25pm Dnarever wrote on Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:19pm: Maqqa wrote on Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:17pm: This is an indictment on Rudd the selfish self-absorb selfie seeker More an indictment of Abbott - the first thing he had to say - what a grub. I see You are blaming Abbott for the result!!!
Back to top	Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number IP Logged

Bam Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21905 Gender:	Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Reply #4 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:26pm And yet only lost about 15 seats, why? The minor parties and independents polled one vote in eight, or more than one vote in five if the Greens are included. When was the last time that one vote in five went to a party other than the ALP or a Coalition party?
Back to top	You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument. IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 40784 Gender:	Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Reply #5 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:43pm What a whipping. And the spazzo lefties cheered on the architect of their demise. they merit sterilization
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

Bam Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21905 Gender:	Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Reply #6 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:44pm Yet the ALP polled more primary votes than any other party.
Back to top	You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument. IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 40784 Gender:	Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Reply #7 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:46pm shows a leftys vote is worth 1/4 of anyone elses.
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 107390 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Reply #8 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:48pm Labor will come back to power - they always do.
Back to top	IP Logged

skippy. Gold Member Offline Posts: 20882 Gender:	Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Reply #9 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:52pm Maqqa wrote on Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:17pm: This is an indictment on Rudd the selfish self-absorb selfie seeker Abbott already telling lies as PM. It is the lowest since the second world war, not one hundred years, ABBOTT is a lying dog, still.
Back to top	freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL Click onWWW below IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 40784 Gender:	Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Reply #10 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 11:01pm Bobby. wrote on Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:48pm: Labor will come back to power - they always do. a dog returns to its vomit
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years
Reply #11 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 11:02pm

Bam wrote on Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:26pm:

And yet only lost about 15 seats, why? The minor parties and independents polled one vote in eight, or more than one vote in five if the Greens are included. When was the last time that one vote in five went to a party other than the ALP or a Coalition party?

actually looks closer to a loss of 20 seats and ~40 seat majority. pretty good result!

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 45675 Gender:	Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Reply #12 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 11:03pm Bam wrote on Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:44pm: Yet the ALP polled more primary votes than any other party. pitiful. they were massacred by the COALITION. get over it loser.
Back to top	AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..." IP Logged

Pantheon Gold Member Offline Woke Posts: 1256 Gender:	Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Reply #13 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 11:03pm Labor's primary lowest in 100 years, as it should be!!!
Back to top	[b][center]Socialism had been tried on every continent on earth. In light of its results, it's time to question the motives of its advocates. IP Logged

skippy. Gold Member Offline Posts: 20882 Gender:	Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Reply #14 - Sep 7^th, 2013 at 11:07pm longweekend58 wrote on Sep 7^th, 2013 at 11:03pm: Bam wrote on Sep 7^th, 2013 at 10:44pm: Yet the ALP polled more primary votes than any other party. pitiful. they were massacred by the COALITION. get over it loser. Still a bitter old man even in triumph.
Back to top	freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL Click onWWW below IP Logged