Rider wrote on Sep 14
th, 2013 at 9:28am:
;
Kat wrote on Sep 14
th, 2013 at 9:03am:
The NBN is such a vital piece of infrastructure for the future of the country, that any attempt
to interfere with it, cut it back, or do away with it, should be regarded as an act of treason.
Vital??...in order to prove it is 'vital' we need to analyse the cost/benefit relationship. So back to the start.
You seem to believe that your ignorance of uses to which the Internet is put, and may be put in the future, is significant.
As has
already been established, that belief is consistent with the psychosis commonly known as a
God Complex.
Rider wrote on Sep 14
th, 2013 at 9:28am:
Vital does not cover being able to download porn and movies quicker ...
Your usage is not representative of the population in general.
Rider wrote on Sep 14
th, 2013 at 9:28am:
Vital is perfectly arguable in commercial centres, business hubs etc, ...
You evidently have a preference for young boys
delivering telegrams on bicycles.
Even
longweekend58 had to admit that the exponential rise in demand for bandwidth shows no sign of slowing. Despite his best efforts (in the same post), he couldn't discredit the forecast that
demand will hit the 1Gb/s level by 2020. He made a fool of himself, as usual, by underestimating fibre. In case the realisation eluded you, 1Gb/s is beyond the realistic capacity of copper in the circumstances. The Coalition's nodes will be scrap before the plan is completed.
We need fibre to the premises to meet the observed exponential rise in demand for bandwidth. For the record, I'm quite content to say that I don't know what the bandwidth will be used for. I don't even pretend to know what bandwidth
is used for now. In reality, we're all in the position of that bloke who couldn't figure out what use a telephone might be. Our frame of reference is telegrams delivered by bicycle.