longweekend58 wrote on Sep 16
th, 2013 at 12:22pm:
... ask yourself why labor never did a CBA? ...
That's a question I've asked in fora far more credible than this. The answer is that there have been numerous analyses, assessments, studies, papers and whatever over the years.
When Internet usage first began to bloom, issues with Australia's telecommunications network were highlighted. Here are a few of the links:
Roger Clarke's 'Networked Nation'ACS: Vision for a Networked NationNetworking Australia's FutureNote that they all date from 1994. Over the intervening years, there have been many more. 1994 was during the Keating years.
Take particular note of
the second term of reference for the government inquiry. Labor has indeed done cost/benefit analysis.
Until recently, enhanced and equitable access to broadband had bipartisan support. Remember OpEl? That support evaporated when Kevin Rudd announced fibre to the premises. So how did that come about?
Rudd went to the 2007 election with a fibre to the node plan. At the time,
the Coalition branded it "fraudband". Unfortunately, the plan relied on access to Telstra's monopoly customer access network. Then Telstra CEO, Sol Trujillo, played the ultimate obstructionist.
Trujillo was thinking in American. Rudd did what no US President would or could: he decided to build over Telstra's monopoly. Most of the cost of building a network lies in getting machines and workers to the job. It made no sense to duplicate the already obsolete copper network, so he went for fibre to the premises.
Under the circumstances, what's your problem?
so now you want to refer me to a 1994 report when even dial-up was in its infancy and you want to pretend that labor has done a CBA on the NBN
you are certainly entertaining... but not very bright.