longweekend58 wrote on Sep 18
th, 2013 at 2:06pm:
why do you continue with such unsubstantiated drivel. Quigley made the claim in a politically motivated rant. even your preferred FTTH is unable to prove 1Gb without significant upgrade and then what do you do in 2027 when we need 100Gbps which fibre CANNOT provide.
you'd believe anyone if they said something you liked.
Hey LW58, stop being wrong.
FTTH upgrades only require updating infrastructure at the nodes. Once the fibre is in the ground it doesnt need changing. Do you know why? (that was a rhetorical question, I know you dont know the answer)
Its because the signals are travelling as fast as possible, given our current understanding of science. Sure, you will need to change the magic boxes that you have no idea about, but they are all in simple to get at locations, and you dont need to rip up the street again.
But just one question. The LNPs plan involves Telstra just giving them the copper. DO you think this is likely to happen, given that one of the major reasons the ALP went with FTTH was because Telstra wanted too much money for their copper?